Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Clin Oncol. Oct 10, 2016; 7(5): 387-394
Published online Oct 10, 2016. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v7.i5.387
Published online Oct 10, 2016. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v7.i5.387
Table 1 Clinical and pathological general features
Features | n = 98 (%) |
Median age | 49 ± 9 |
Clinical stage | |
II | 13 (13.3) |
III | 85 (86.73) |
Histologic grade | |
II | 23 (23.5) |
III | 74 (75.5) |
Subtype histologic | |
Ductal | 95 (96.9) |
Lobular | 2 (2.1) |
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy | |
AC | 9 (9.2) |
AC-Taxane | 86 (87.7) |
Taxane alone | 3 (3.1) |
Surgery | |
Tumorectomy | 29 (29.6) |
Mastectomy | 65 (66.3) |
Unknown | 4 (4.1) |
Inflammatory | |
No | 69 (70.4) |
Yes | 29 (29.6) |
pCR | |
No | 69 (70.4) |
Yes | 29 (29.6) |
Recurrence | |
No | 56 (57.1) |
Yes | 42 (42.9) |
Death | |
No | 53 (54.1) |
Yes | 45 (45.9) |
Table 2 Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in pre-neoadjuvant-chemotherapy and post-neoadjuvant-chemotherapy samples (median ± interquartile range)
TIL population | (Me ± IQR) |
Pre-NAC TIL | |
Median percentage TIL H and E full-face (n = 91) | 40 ± 20 |
Median percentage TIL H and E TMA (n = 30) | 20 ± 15 |
Median counting TIL CD3 (n = 28) | 244.5 ± 253.8 |
Median counting TIL CD4 (n = 19) | 48 ± 107.5 |
Median counting TIL CD8 (n = 28) | 102 ± 98.8 |
Median counting TIL FOXP3 (n = 29) | 22 ± 35 |
Post-NAC TIL | |
Median percentage TIL H and E (n = 80) | 20 ± 15 |
Median percentage TIL H and E TMA (n = 58) | 10 ± 5 |
Median counting TIL CD3 (n = 68) | 156.5 ± 200.8 |
Median counting TIL CD4 (n = 54) | 12 ± 27.5 |
Median counting TIL CD8 (n = 70) | 75.5 ± 93.5 |
Median counting TIL FOXP3 (n = 70) | 7.5 ± 14.5 |
Table 3 Comparison between tumor-infiltrating-lymphocytes evaluated in full-face and tissue microarrays sections
Features | H and E in the full-face section | H and E in TMA section | ||||
n | Me ± IQD | P-value2 | n | Me ± IQD | P-value3 | |
Pre-NAC | 91 | 30 | ||||
Age | 0.1427 | 0.6313 | ||||
≤ 49 | 50 | 40 ± 20 | 19 | 20 ± 15 | ||
> 49 | 41 | 20 ± 15 | 11 | 20 ± 25 | ||
pCR | 0.02511 | 0.2227 | ||||
No | 63 | 30 ± 20 | 15 | 30 ± 25 | ||
Yes | 28 | 40 ± 17.5 | 15 | 20 ± 10 | ||
Inflammatory | 0.6401 | 0.03871 | ||||
Yes | 27 | 40 ± 15 | 8 | 10 ± 6.5 | ||
No | 64 | 35 ± 20 | 22 | 30 ± 15 | ||
DFS | 0.00761 | 0.1601 | ||||
< 32 mo | 46 | 20 ± 20 | 20 | 15 ± 13.8 | ||
≥ 32 mo | 45 | 40 ± 20 | 10 | 25 ± 25 | ||
OS | 0.03341 | 0.7214 | ||||
< 41 mo | 51 | 30 ± 20 | 22 | 20 ± 15 | ||
≥ 41 mo | 40 | 40 ± 20 | 8 | 20 ± 15 | ||
Post-NAC | 80 | 58 | ||||
Age | 0.8547 | 0.5684 | ||||
≤ 49 | 43 | 20 ± 15 | 31 | 10 ± 15 | ||
> 49 | 37 | 20 ± 15 | 27 | 10 ± 5 | ||
Inflammatory | 0.4582 | 0.1299 | ||||
Yes | 26 | 15 ± 10 | 16 | 10 ± 0 | ||
No | 54 | 20 ± 15 | 42 | 10 ± 15 | ||
pCR | 0.6331 | 0.1299 | ||||
No | 63 | 20 ± 15 | 44 | 10 ± 7.5 | ||
Yes | 17 | 20 ± 10 | 14 | 10 ± 7.5 | ||
DFS3 | 0.2450 | 0.2573 | ||||
< 32 mo | 35 | 20 ± 15 | 22 | 10 ± 0 | ||
≥ 32 mo | 28 | 20 ± 15 | 22 | 10 ± 15 | ||
OS3 | 0.5973 | 0.6948 | ||||
< 41 mo | 40 | 20 ± 15 | 27 | 10 ± 10 | ||
≥ 41 mo | 23 | 20 ± 15 | 17 | 10 ± 5 |
Table 4 Comparison of tumor-infiltrating-lymphocyte evaluated in pre- vs post-neoadjuvant-chemotherapy samples
Population of lymphocytes | n | Pre-NAC Me ± IQR | Post-NAC Me ± IQR | P-value2 | P corrected value3 |
Percentage | |||||
H and E whole slide | 73 | 40 ± 15 | 20 ± 15 | < 0.001 | < 0.0021 |
H and E TMA | 16 | 30 ± 17.5 | 15 ± 15 | 0.4321 | |
Absolute counting | |||||
CD3 | 22 | 244.5 ± 315.5 | 255.5 ± 267 | 0.8583 | |
CD4 | 7 | 14 ± 94 | 32 ± 43 | 0.6721 | |
CD8 | 21 | 127 ± 193.5 | 156 ± 90.5 | 0.7544 | |
FOXP3 | 21 | 18 ± 31 | 12 ± 19.5 | 0.0917 |
Table 5 Relationship between percentage and absolute counting methodologies of tumor-infiltrating-lymphocyte subpopulations
- Citation: Castaneda CA, Mittendorf E, Casavilca S, Wu Y, Castillo M, Arboleda P, Nunez T, Guerra H, Barrionuevo C, Dolores-Cerna K, Belmar-Lopez C, Abugattas J, Calderon G, De La Cruz M, Cotrina M, Dunstan J, Gomez HL, Vidaurre T. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in triple negative breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. World J Clin Oncol 2016; 7(5): 387-394
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v7/i5/387.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v7.i5.387