Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Oncol. Dec 10, 2014; 5(5): 931-965
Published online Dec 10, 2014. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i5.931
Table 1 Cytology and DNA Cytometry results from Ref[76]
Cytology1DNA Cytometry
NILM18503Negative17855
ASCUS720 (0.40)Equivocal1395
LSIL296 (0.89)Positive371
HSIL59 (1.00)
Total19621Total19621
Table 2 Biopsy results vs Cytology from Ref[76]
Cytology
HistologyTotalNILM/inflamASCUSLSILHSIL
Ca15654
CIN3435101414
CIN26612152316
CIN19842222113
CC/Neg401285861812
Total6233441398159
Table 3 Biopsy results vs DNA Cytometry from Ref[76]
DNA Cytometry
HistologyTotalNegEquivPos
Ca15213
CIN34311230
CIN26631944
CIN198155528
CC/Neg4018728034
Total623106368149
Table 4 2 × 2 Contingency Tables for Biopsy results vs Cytology and vs DNA Cytometry from Ref[76]
Cytology
DNA Cytometry
HistologyTotalLSIL+NILM/ASCUSPosNeg/Equiv
CIN2+12476488737
Neg/CIN14996443562437
Total623140483149474
Table 5 Cytology and Cytometry test performance based on data and analysis from Ref[76]
CytologyDNA Cytometry
Sensitivity61.3%70.2%
Specificity87.2%87.6%
PPV54.3%58.4%
NPV90.1%92.2%
Table 6 3 × 3 Contingency Table for Biopsy results vs Cytology from Ref[76]
Cytology
HistologyTotalPositive (LSIL+)Equivocal (ASCUS)Negative
Positive (CIN2+)124763117
Equivocal (CIN1)98342242
Negative18560308618444
Total1878214013918503
Table 7 3 × 3 Contingency Table for Biopsy results vs DNA Cytometry from Ref[76]
DNA Cytometry
HistologyTotalPositiveEquivocalNegative
Positive (CIN2+)12487334
Equivocal (CIN1)98285515
Negative181503428017836
Total1837214936817855
Table 8 Cytology and Cytometry test performance based on data from Ref[76] and revised analysis
CytologyDNA Cytometry
Sensitivity73.4%91.4%
Specificity99.4%98.3%
PPV54.3%58.4%
NPV99.68%99.89%
Table 9 Descriptive summary of the data of Ref [76] as re-analyzed n (%)
Clinical resultCytology number of casesDNA Cytometry number of casesCytometry-Cytology number (%)
1Number of women immediately returned to routine screening1850317855-648 (-3.5)
2Number of CIN1+ cases (false negative cases) per 10000 women returned to routine screening3211-21 (-66)
3Number of women referred to immediate colposcopy1401499 (6)
4Number of cases of invasive cancer immediately diagnosed9134 (44)
5Number of CIN3+ cases immediately diagnosed37436 (16)
6Number of clinically positive cases (CIN2+) immediately diagnosed by colposcopy768711 (15)
7Number of women requiring 6 mo follow-up due to equivocal result139368229 (165)
8Number of women with potentially delayed clinically positive (CIN2+) diagnosis31332 (6)
9Number of CIN3+ cases missed514 (80)
10Number of CIN2+ cases missed17413 (76)
Table 10 Definitions of the biopsy data required for comparison of two screening tests independent of simple verification bias, Ref[80]
Gold standard positive
Gold standard negative
Test 1+Test 1-TotalTest 1+Test 1-Total
Test 2+aba + bABA + B
Test 2-c[d][c + d]C[D][C + D]
Totala + c[b + d][n]A + C[B + D][N]
Table 11 Biopsy data from Ref[82] for simple verification bias free comparison of Cytology vs DNA cytometry
Biopsy +
Biopsy -
Cytology +Cytology -TotalCytology +Cytology -Total
AQIC+13037167302353
AQIC-101000
Total13137168302353
Table 12 Alternative presentation of Biopsy data from Ref[82] for simple verification bias free comparison of Cytology vs DNA Cytometry
Cytology
DNA Cytometry
HistologyTotalASCUS+NILMHistologyTotalPos/equivNeg
CIN1+16813137CIN1+1271671
Neg533023Neg121530
Total22116160Total2212201
Table 13 The test performance limits for the combination of two binary valued tests
Sensitivity
Specificity
MinimumMaximumMinimumMaximum
Logical “AND”(Se1 + Se2) - 11Min (Se1, Se2)Max (Sp1, Sp2)(Sp1 + Sp2)3
Logical “OR”Max (Se1, Se2)(Se1 + Se2)4(Sp1 + Sp2) - 12Min (Sp1, Sp2)
Table 14 Crude cancer prevalence and other data from 36 published DNA Cytometry studies from China, 2005-2013
Ref.Invasive cancer casesCIN2+ casesTotal screenedCrude cancer prevalence (per 100000 persons)Crude CIN2+ prevalence (%)Follow-up ratioCa/CIN2+ (× 10)
[110]3145006002.82.14
[82]71002369829.50.420.380.7
[111]48103402011942.560.784.66
[112]122120083.31.830.45
[113]217673297.22.531.18
[114]4123551112.60.343.33
[115]215316263.30.470.391.33
[116]14784109340.71.90.931.79
[117]484926143.20.910.360.48
[118]2302599771.150.67
[119]36512002505.420.46
[120]91116793132.51.6310.81
[121]016200300.80
[122]4872153185.84.040.46
[123]3561207924.80.460.54
[124]5263000166.70.871.92
[125]81425886135.92.4110.56
[126]111477735142.21.910.75
[127]141459821.70.890.24
[128]4341227832.60.281.18
[129]211358955.70.311.82
[130]3171806166.10.941.76
[131]010120600.830
[132]85136032221.4211.57
[133]10616823993441.80.76.31
[134]6361220491.82.951.67
[76]151241962176.40.631.21
[55]221307065.10.680.95
[135]1152000500.750.67
[136]05125600.40
[137]3017218097165.80.951.74
[138]17451221.71.551.43
[139]10534302325.612.331.89
[140]6122832211.90.425
[141]159586701731.11.58
[142]3018722169135.30.841.6
Table 15 Biopsy data for DNA Cytometry and hrHPV test results for 294 cases of Cytology ASCUS, from Ref[169]
hrHPVHistology
NegCIN1CIN2+
hrHPV Pos216
Ploidy Neg90101
Ploidy Equ22258
Ploidy Pos51243
hrHPV Neg78
Ploidy Neg3501
Ploidy Equ1200
Ploidy Pos14160
Table 16 Test performance indicators for DNA Cytometry, hrHPV tests and combined DNA Cytometry and hrHPV tests, for Cytology ASCUS cases, Ref[169]
875 Cases (157 CIN2+)
294 Cases (53 CIN2+)
Performance indicator for CIN2+ (%)DNA PloidyhrHPVDNA PloidyDNA Ploidy and hrHPV
bSensitivity98.898.196.296.2
bSpecificity47.532.056.073.4
bPPV29.124.132.544.3
bNPV99.498.798.598.9
Table 17 Test performance indicators following re-analysis of the data of Table 16 from Ref[169]
875 Cases (157 CIN2+)
294 Cases (53 CIN2+)
Performance indicator for CIN2+ (%)DNA PloidyhrHPVDNA PloidyDNA Ploidy and hrHPV
bSensitivity98.898.196.296.2
bSpecificity47.532.056.073.4
bPPV40.824.147.871.7
bNPV99.498.798.598.9