Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Oncol. Dec 10, 2014; 5(5): 858-864
Published online Dec 10, 2014. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i5.858
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of subjects in studies evaluating response to erlotinib after gefitinib
Ref.YearCountryType of studyNo. of patientsGender (M/F)Smoking status (smokers/NS)Histology (A/S/other)
Garfield[9]2005United StatesCase report11/01/00/0/1
Viswanathan et al[16]2005United StatesCase report51/42/3NA
Walther et al[17]2006United KingdomCase report10/10/11/0/0
Chang et al[18]2007TaiwanCase report11/01/01/0/0
Cho et al[19]2007South KoreaProspective2110/1110/1116/3/2
Gridelli et al[32]2007ItalyCase report30/30/33/0/0
Kim et al[33]2007South KoreaCase report10/10/11/0/0
Costa et al[23]2008United StatesRetrospective187/117/1116/0/2
Lee et al[21]2008South KoreaProspective234/190/2322/0/1
Vasile et al[22]2008ItalyProspective84/41/76/0/2
Wong et al[20]2008SingaporeRetrospective144/101/1310/1/3
Wong et al[34]2008SingaporeCase report10/10/11/0/0
Wu et al[35]2008TaiwanCase report10/10/11/0/0
Katayama et al[36]2009JapanRetrospective72/5NA7/0/0
Sim et al[24]2009South KoreaRetrospective160/160/1616/0/0
Zhou et al[25]2009ChinaProspective2114/710/118/9/4
Wong et al[26]2010ChinaRetrospective212/191/2019/0/2
Asami et al[27]2011JapanRetrospective4213/2914/2842/0/0
Hata et al[29]2011JapanRetrospective12549/7655/70117/NA/8
Masuda et al[37]2011JapanCase report33/0NA3/0/0
Shoji et al[38]2011JapanCase report11/0NA1/0/0
Song et al[39]2011ChinaRetrospective209/115/1518/0/2
Takenaka et al[40]2011JapanCase report10/10/11/0/0
Saito et al[41]2012JapanRetrospective219/129/1219/0/2
Tetsumoto et al[42]2012JapanCase report20/20/22/0/0
Koyama et al[43]2013JapanRetrospective104156/4850/5490/6/8
Table 2 Prevalence of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and comparison of responses to gefitinib and erlotinib n (%)
Ref.No. ofpatientsEGFRmutations noE19 Del/E21L858RResponse to prior gefitinib
Response to erlotinib
CRPRSDPDCRPRSDPD
Garfield[9]1NANA1(100)1(100)
Viswanathan et al[16]5NANA4(80.0)1(20.0)5(100)
Walther et al[17]1NANA1(100)1(100)
Chang et al[18]11 (100)1/01(100)1(100)
Cho et al[19]215 (23.8)5/06(28.6)4(19.0)11(52.4)2(9.5)4(19.0)15(71.5)
Gridelli et al[32]3NANA3(100)1(33.3)2(66.7)
Kim et al[33]1NANA1(100)1(100)
Costa et al[23]18117 (94.4)4/1311(84.6)2(15.4)1(7.7)2(15.4)10(76.9)
Lee et al[21]233 (13.0)3/015(65.2)2(8.7)6(26.1)1(4.3)1(4.3)21(91.4)
Vasile et al[22]8NANA4(50.0)4(50.0)2(25.0)3(37.5)3(37.5)
Wong et al[20]147 (50.0)4/39(64.3)5(35.7)5(35.7)9(64.3)
Wong et al[34]11 (100)1/01(100)1(100)
Wu et al[35]11 (100)0/11(100)1(100)
Katayama et al[36]76 (85.7)4/22(28.6)2(28.6)3(42.8)3(42.9)3(42.9)1(14.3)
Sim et al[24]165 (31.3)2/39(56.3)2(12.5)5(31.2)1(6.3)3(18.7)12(75.0)
Zhou et al[25]217 (33.3)NA/NA2(9.5)8(38.1)11(52.4)2(9.5)4(19.1)15(71.4)
Wong et al[26]213 (14.3)0/318(85.7)3(14.3)12(57.1)9(42.9)
Asami et al[27]4228 (66.7)14/1422(52.4)17(40.5)3(7.1)1(2.4)24(57.1)17(40.5)
Hata et al[29]125263 (50.4)NA/NA3(2.5)68(56.2)22(18.2)28(23.1)11(8.8)44(35.2)70(56.0)
Masuda et al[37]33 (100)2/13(100)3(100)
Shoji et al[38]10 (0)0 (0)1(100)1(100)
Song et al[39]205 (25.0)3/25(25.0)9(45.0)6(30.0)7(35.0)13(65.0)
Takenaka et al[40]11 (100)1/01(100)1(100)
Saito et al[41]2112 (57.1)0/1216(76.2)5(23.8)2(9)6(19)13(62)
Tetsumoto et al[42]22 (100)1/12(100)2(100)
Koyama et al[43]5444 (81.5)22/224(7.4)32(59.3)13(24.0)5(9.3)0 (0)4(7.4)30(55.6)20(37.0)
Table 3 Response rates and survival rates with erlotinib following gefitinib therapy
Ref.RRDCRPFSOS
Cho et al[19]9.50%28.60%60 d158 d
Costa et al[23]2 mo
Lee et al[21]4.30%8.70%
Vasile et al[22]25%62.50%5.9 mo14.6 mo
Wong et al[20]35.70%97 d
Sim et al[24]25%1.7 mo
Zhou et al[25]9.50%28.50%55 d135 d
Wong et al[26]57.10%14.9 wk40 mo
Asami et al[27]2.40%59.50%3.4 mo7.1 mo
Hata et al[29]9%44%2 mo11.8 mo
Song et al[39]035%31 d4.2 mo
Saito et al[41]38.10%369 d
Koyama et al[43]7.40%63.00%135 d333 d
Table 4 Pooled analysis of demographic profile, prevalence of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and disease control rates with erlotinib following prior gefitinib therapy
Female gender : 60.6% (292 of 482)
Adenocarcinoma histology: 88.3% (421 of 477)
Non smokers: 64.5% (304 of 471)
East Asian ethnicity: 92.3% (445 of 482)
EGFR mutation positive status1: 48.4% (224 of 463)
Disease control rate with prior gefitinib treatment: 79.4% (336 of 423)
Disease control rate with subsequent erlotinib treatment: 45.4% (194 of 427)
Table 5 Potential factors predicting response to erlotinib following prior gefitinib therapy
Previous response to gefitinib (most important)
Longer duration of response to prior gefitinib
Female gender
Adenocarcinoma histology
Non smokers
East Asian ethnicity
EGFR mutation positive status1
Good performance status
Chemotherapy cycles in between gefitinib and erlotinib