Minireviews
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Oncol. Aug 10, 2014; 5(3): 546-553
Published online Aug 10, 2014. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.546
Table 1 Risk that ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma is found on subsequent surgical excision pathology following a core biopsy diagnosis of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ
Ref.No. of PLCIS casesDiagnosis oncore biopsySurgical procedurePLCIS alone on surgical specimenConcurrent DCIS or invasive carcinoma on surgical specimenConcurrent DCIS (%)Concurrent invasive cancer (%)
Carder et al[4]1010 PLCIS2 DB, 8 WLE73 ILC030
Chivukula et al[3]1212 PLCIS1 DB, 1 WLE, 8 SMx, 1Mx, 1BMx93 ILC025
Fasola et al[30]3413 PLCIS 21 PLCIS + DCIS or ICPLCIS: 11 WLE, 2 Mx PLCIS with DCIS or IC: 9 WLE, 12 Mx49 DCIS 15 ILC 6 IDC2662
Morris et al[31]173 PLCIS 7 PLCIS + DCIS 7 PLCIS + IC17 WLE33 DCIS 11 IC1865
Niell et al[32]55 PLCIS5 WLE11 DCIS 2 ILC 1 IDC2060
Georgian-Smith et al[33]55 PLCIS5 WLE32 IC040
Lavoue et al[34]1010 PLCIS10 WLE73 ILC030
Total9358 PLCIS 7 PLCIS + DCIS 7 PLCIS + IC 21 PLCIS + DCIS or IC3413 DCIS 26 ILC 7 IDC 13 IC1449
Table 2 Rate of recurrent disease after surgical excision of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ
Ref.No. of PLCIS casesPLCIS at marginHistology of recurrenceTime to recurrenceLocal recurrence rate
Downs-Kelly et al[5]2613 cases ≤ 1 mm 4 cases 1.1-2 mm 9 cases > 2 mm1 PLCIS19 mo3.8%
Khoury et al[35]57Not stated7 PLCISNot stated12.3%
Fasola et al[30]34Not stated3 PLCIS ≤ 5 yr8.85
Table 3 Summary of guidelines for the management of in situ breast disease
Guideline sourceRecommendation-PLCISRecommendation-CLCISRecommendation-DCIS
ABS, 2009[16] (United Kingdom)PLCIS not mentionedShould consider diagnostic biopsy Clear margins not required Post-op surveillance is appropriate (No adjuvant treatment mentioned) (No lymph node surgery required)Resection with clear margins (> 1 mm) required (WLE or Mx) Intra-op radiography should be used for all DCIS as majority impalpable Lymph node surgery not usually required but may be considered in high risk cases
NCCN, 2013[20] (United States)“Consider excision with negative margins”Diagnostic biopsy Risk reducing treatment discussion with patient (options: risk reducing surgery, hormone therapy, no further treatment) Surveillance indicatedConsider MRI WLE or Mx Margin controversial but certainly > 1 mm SLNB usually not required but may be considered in high risk cases Consider RTx
ESMO, 2013[29] (pan-European)“May behave similarly to DCIS and should be treated accordingly”Risk factor for future development of invasive cancer and does not require active treatmentResection with clear margin (≥ 2 mm) required (WLE or Mx) SLNB usually not required but may be considered in high risk cases
NBOCC, 2003[27] (Australia)PLCIS not mentionedConsider surgical biopsy Surveillance ≥ 15 yr No role for clear margin excision establishedClear margin excision Usually adjuvant RTx Consider hormone therapy
NHSBSP “In situ lobular neoplasia: overview and recommendations” [pending publication][17] (United Kingdom)Should be classified B5a (as with DCIS) and excised with negative marginsMerits MDT discussion and usually diagnostic biopsy