Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Oncol. Aug 10, 2014; 5(3): 546-553
Published online Aug 10, 2014. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.546
Published online Aug 10, 2014. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.546
Ref. | No. of PLCIS cases | Diagnosis oncore biopsy | Surgical procedure | PLCIS alone on surgical specimen | Concurrent DCIS or invasive carcinoma on surgical specimen | Concurrent DCIS (%) | Concurrent invasive cancer (%) |
Carder et al[4] | 10 | 10 PLCIS | 2 DB, 8 WLE | 7 | 3 ILC | 0 | 30 |
Chivukula et al[3] | 12 | 12 PLCIS | 1 DB, 1 WLE, 8 SMx, 1Mx, 1BMx | 9 | 3 ILC | 0 | 25 |
Fasola et al[30] | 34 | 13 PLCIS 21 PLCIS + DCIS or IC | PLCIS: 11 WLE, 2 Mx PLCIS with DCIS or IC: 9 WLE, 12 Mx | 4 | 9 DCIS 15 ILC 6 IDC | 26 | 62 |
Morris et al[31] | 17 | 3 PLCIS 7 PLCIS + DCIS 7 PLCIS + IC | 17 WLE | 3 | 3 DCIS 11 IC | 18 | 65 |
Niell et al[32] | 5 | 5 PLCIS | 5 WLE | 1 | 1 DCIS 2 ILC 1 IDC | 20 | 60 |
Georgian-Smith et al[33] | 5 | 5 PLCIS | 5 WLE | 3 | 2 IC | 0 | 40 |
Lavoue et al[34] | 10 | 10 PLCIS | 10 WLE | 7 | 3 ILC | 0 | 30 |
Total | 93 | 58 PLCIS 7 PLCIS + DCIS 7 PLCIS + IC 21 PLCIS + DCIS or IC | 34 | 13 DCIS 26 ILC 7 IDC 13 IC | 14 | 49 |
Guideline source | Recommendation-PLCIS | Recommendation-CLCIS | Recommendation-DCIS |
ABS, 2009[16] (United Kingdom) | PLCIS not mentioned | Should consider diagnostic biopsy Clear margins not required Post-op surveillance is appropriate (No adjuvant treatment mentioned) (No lymph node surgery required) | Resection with clear margins (> 1 mm) required (WLE or Mx) Intra-op radiography should be used for all DCIS as majority impalpable Lymph node surgery not usually required but may be considered in high risk cases |
NCCN, 2013[20] (United States) | “Consider excision with negative margins” | Diagnostic biopsy Risk reducing treatment discussion with patient (options: risk reducing surgery, hormone therapy, no further treatment) Surveillance indicated | Consider MRI WLE or Mx Margin controversial but certainly > 1 mm SLNB usually not required but may be considered in high risk cases Consider RTx |
ESMO, 2013[29] (pan-European) | “May behave similarly to DCIS and should be treated accordingly” | Risk factor for future development of invasive cancer and does not require active treatment | Resection with clear margin (≥ 2 mm) required (WLE or Mx) SLNB usually not required but may be considered in high risk cases |
NBOCC, 2003[27] (Australia) | PLCIS not mentioned | Consider surgical biopsy Surveillance ≥ 15 yr No role for clear margin excision established | Clear margin excision Usually adjuvant RTx Consider hormone therapy |
NHSBSP “In situ lobular neoplasia: overview and recommendations” [pending publication][17] (United Kingdom) | Should be classified B5a (as with DCIS) and excised with negative margins | Merits MDT discussion and usually diagnostic biopsy |
- Citation: Pieri A, Harvey J, Bundred N. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast: Can the evidence guide practice? World J Clin Oncol 2014; 5(3): 546-553
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v5/i3/546.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.546