Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Clin Oncol. May 10, 2014; 5(2): 142-148
Published online May 10, 2014. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i2.142
Published online May 10, 2014. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i2.142
Table 1 Characteristics of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme
Ref. | rGBM patients | Median age (range) | Median KPS (range) | Median tumor volume (mL) (range) |
Skeie et al[9] | 32 | 51 | 73 | 12.4 |
19 | 50 | 81 | 13.9 | |
Park et al[10] | 11 | 62 (46-72) | 90 (80-100) | 13.6 (1.2-45.1) |
44 | 64 (41-77) | 90 (70-100) | 9.5 (1.5-48.9) | |
Koga et al[28] | 9 | 43 (17-64) | 90 (80-90) | NR |
9 | 53 (27-79) | 90 (80-90) | ||
Elliott et al[11] | 16 | 60 (35-69) | 90 (80-100) | 1.35 (0.37-6.2) |
Pouratian et al[25] | 26 | 60.7 (12.9-76.9) | 80 (40-100) | 21.3 (0.3-110.0) |
Kida et al[21] | 54 | [Mean 52.4 (11-80)] | NR | (Mean: 29.0 mm) (7-48.3 mm) |
1Kong et al[23] | 65 | NR | NR | NR |
Kohshi et al[22] | 11 | NR | NR | NR |
Hsieh et al[24] | 26 | (Mean 58.2) | (Mean: 70) | (Mean: 21.6) |
Table 2 Upfront treatment modalities for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme
Ref. | rGBM patients | Initial surgery | Adjuvant rad | Adjuvant chemotherapy | Time to 1st recurrence (mo) |
Skeie et al[9] | 32 | All GTR | 93.5% of patients had EBRT | 37% Temo, 19.9% PCV | 11.0 (mean) |
19 | (39-60 Gy) | 10.4 (mean) | |||
Park et al[10] | 11 | 4 Bx, 7 GTR | All EBRT (54-60 Gy) | All Temo | NR |
44 | NR | NR | NR | ||
Koga et al[28] | 9 | All resection | 8 EBRT (48-80 Gy) | 6 ACNU, 2 Temo, 1 CE | 14.5 (median) (range, 1-51) |
9 | 2 Bx, 7 resection | All EBRT (60-80 Gy) | All Temo | 12 (median) (range, 6-39) | |
Elliott et al[11] | 16 | NR | All EBRT (60 Gy) | All Temo | 7.9 (median) (range, 2-84) |
Pouratian et al[25] | 26 | 2 Bx, 18 STR, 6 GTR | 25 EBRT (dose NR) | 16 had chemotherapy (type NR) | NR |
Kida et al[21] | 54 | NR | NR | NR | NR |
1Kong et al[23] | 65 | NR | All EBRT (54-70 Gy) | NR | 4.3 (range, 1.5-27.0) |
Kohshi et al[22] | 11 | All debulking | All EBRT (50-72 Gy) | All had chemotherapy (type NR) | NR |
Hsieh et al[24] | 26 | NR | All EBRT (60 Gy) | NR | NR |
Table 3 Salvage treatment modalities and details for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme
Ref. | rGBM patients | Margin GK dose (range) Gy | Salvage resection | Salvage radiotherapy | Salvage chemotherapy |
Skeie et al[9] | 32 | 12.2 (8-20) | None | 19 EBRT | 3 Temo, 15 PCV |
19 | All GTR | 12 EBRT | 1 Temo, 6 PCV | ||
Park et al[10] | 11 | 16 (13-18) | 2 debulking | None | All BZ (9 w/irinotecan, 1 w/Temo) |
44 | 15 (10-20) | 7 resection | 1 EBRT | 19 patients (no BZ) | |
Koga et al[28] | 9 | 20 | NR | NR | NR |
9 | Extended field, 20 | NR | NR | NR | |
Elliott et al[11] | 16 | 15 (12-18) | 14 GTR, 2 NTR | NR | NR |
Pouratian et al[25] | 26 | 6.0 (3.0-15.0) | NR | NR | NR |
Kida et al[21] | 54 | 14.7 (8-25) | NR | NR | NR |
1Kong et al[23] | 65 | 16 (12-50) | NR | NR | 13 Temo or PCV |
Kohshi et al[22] | 11 | 22 (18-27) in 8 fractions followed by HBO therapy | 2 patients | NR | NR |
Hsieh et al[24] | 26 | 12 | NR | NR | NR |
Table 4 Outcomes following Gamma Knife salvage therapy for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme
Ref. | rGBM patients | Med. survival from diagnosis (mo) | Progression-free survival | Median survival after GK salvage (mo) | Time to recurrence, post-GK (mo) | Local tumorcontrol | ARE |
Skeie et al[9] | 32 | 18.0 (95%CI: 16.7-30.8) | NR | 9 (95%CI: 8.7-14.9) | 6 | 18.8% | 9.80% |
19 (salvage GTR) | 21.0 (95%CI: 21.2-55.9) | 15 (95%CI: 12.8-40.4) | |||||
Park et al[10] | 11 (salvage BZ) | 33.2 (95%CI: 23.7-42.7) | 14.9 (95%CI: 6.5-23.3) | 17.9 (95%CI: 10.1-25.7) | All 6 tumors > 10 mL: 5.9 (95%CI: 1.8-10.0) 1 of 5 tumors < 10 mL: 9.5 | NR | 9.00% |
44 | 26.7 (95%CI: 21.8-31.6) | 6.7 (95%CI: 5.6-7.8) | 12.2 (95%CI: 8.1-16.3) | 19 of 21 tumors > 10 mL: 5.1 (95%CI: 4.0-6.2) 21 of 23 tumors < 10 mL: 8.3 (95%CI: 4.2-12.4) | NR | 46% | |
Koga et al[28] | 9 | 24.0 (range, 14-57) | NR | 10.5 (range, 3-29) | NR | 47.0% | 5.90% |
9 (EF GK) | 21.0 (range, 15-51) | 9 (range, 6-27) | 93.0% | 28.6% | |||
Elliott et al[11] | 16 | 26.1 | NR | 13 (range, 2.5-37.2) | NR | NR | 18.8% |
Pouratian et al[25] | 26 | 17.4 (95%CI: 14.4-20.4) | 7.1 (95%CI: 2.9-11.3) | 9.4 (95%CI: 7.9-10.9) | NR | NR | 0.0% |
Kida et al[21] | 54 | 27.0 | NR | 14.0 | NR | NR | NR |
1Kong et al[23] | 65 | 23.0 (95%CI: 16.2-29.3) | 4.6 (95%CI: 4.0-5.2) | 13 (95%CI: 10.6-16.0) | NR | NR | NR |
Kohshi et al[22] | 11 | 21.0 (95%CI: 16-26) | NR | 11 (95%CI: 4-12) | NR | NR | 18.0% |
Hsieh et al[24] | 26 | 16.7 | NR | 10.0 | NR | NR | NR |
- Citation: Larson EW, Peterson HE, Lamoreaux WT, MacKay AR, Fairbanks RK, Call JA, Carlson JD, Ling BC, Demakas JJ, Cooke BS, Lee CM. Clinical outcomes following salvage Gamma Knife radiosurgery for recurrent glioblastoma. World J Clin Oncol 2014; 5(2): 142-148
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v5/i2/142.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v5.i2.142