Editorial
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Clin Oncol. Dec 10, 2011; 2(12): 377-383
Published online Dec 10, 2011. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v2.i12.377
Table 1 Standard approach to nasopharyngeal carcinoma
StageDenominationGold standard therapy
T1-2a N0 M0Early stage- IMRT alone - Conventional RT alone
From T2b N0 M0 to T4b N3 M0 also every T N2/3 M0Locally advanced- Neoadjuvant platinum-based CT followed by IMRT or CCRT (platinum-based) - Concurrent cDDP and RT
Every T every N M1Metastatic- Exclusive CT
Table 2 Chemo-radiation trials
TrialPhasePtsStudy designMain end-pointResults
Lin JC et al[4]III284Exclusive RT alone vs cDDP-5FU + RT5-year DFSExperimental arm better (P < 0.0012)
Chan AT et al[5]III350Exclusive RT alone vs cDDP-5FU + RT2-year PFSExperimental arm better (P < 0.016)
Zhang L et al[12]III(m)1608Exclusive RT alone vs cDDP based CT + RT5-year OSExperimental arm better (P < 0.001)
Yang AK et al[13]III(m)1993Exclusive RT alone vs cDDP based CT + RT5-year OSExperimental arm better (P < 0.05)
Lu H et al[17]II22IMRT + cDDP1 year OS96%
Ekenel M et al[34]II100IMRT+ cDDP-CetORR100%
Table 3 Adjuvant chemotherapy trials
TrialPhasePtsStudy designMain end-pointResults
Al-Sarraf M et al[18]III147Exclusive RT alone vs CCRT followed by cDDP-5FU3-year PFSExperimental arm better (P < 0.01)
Chen Y et al[19]III316Exclusive RT alone vs CCRT followed by cDDP-5FU2-year OSExperimental arm better (P < 0.003)
Lee AW et al[20]III348Exclusive RT alone vs CCRT followed by cDDP-5FU5-year PFSExperimental arm better (P < 0.035)
Park KH et al[21]II43cDDP-5-FU + RT followed by cDDP-Epi-Ble CTORR100%
Hu W et al[22]II54w Pac + RT followed by cDDP-Pac CTORR100%
Leung TW et al[10]II48HFRT + cDDP based CT followed by cDDP-5FU CT3-year DFS71%
Table 4 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials
TrialPhasePtsStudy designMain end-pointResults
Al-Amro A et al[23]II110Neo cDDP-Epi and followed by cDDP + RTORR100%
Airoldi M et al[24]II30Neo cbdca-Pac followed by RT + cbdca-PacORR87%
Ferrari D et al[25]II34Neo cDDP-5FU followed by RT + cDDPORR85.3%
Lu X et al[26]II58Neo cbdca-Tax followed by cbdca + RT (arm A) vs neo cbdca-5FU followed by cbdca + RT (armB)1-year DFSno difference between arm A and B
Mosatafa E et al[27]II36Neo cDDP-Pac followed by cDDP-RTORR89%
Hui EP et al[28]II65Neo cDDP-Tax followed by cDDP + RT (arm A) vs cDDP + RT (arm B)3-year OSArm A better than arm B (P < 0.012)
Bossi P et al[29]II45Neo cDDP-Tax-5FU followed by cDDP + RTORR98%
Cho S et al[30]II19Neo cDDP-Tax-5FU followed by cDDP + RTORR93%
Bae WK et al[32]II33Neo cDDP-Tax-5FU followed by cDDP + RTORR99%
Kong L et al[6]II52Neo cDDP-Tax-5FU followed by cDDP + RTORR90.2%
Ekenel M et al[34]II59Neo cDDP-Tax followed by cDDP + RTORR95%
Lin S et al[35]II370Neo cDDP based CT followed by IMRT3-year OS90%