Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Aug 24, 2025; 16(8): 109419
Published online Aug 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i8.109419
Published online Aug 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i8.109419
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients in combination group and monotherapy group before and after propensity score matching, n (%)
Characteristics | Before PSM | After PSM | ||||||
Monotherapy group (n = 532) | Combination group (n = 72) | P value | SMD | Monotherapy group (n = 72) | Combination group (n = 72) | P value | SMD | |
Gender | - | - | 0.882 | - | - | - | 0.325 | - |
Female | 59 (11.1) | 7 (9.72) | - | -0.023 | 12 (16.7) | 7 (9.72) | - | -0.011 |
Male | 473 (88.9) | 65 (90.3) | - | 0.023 | 60 (83.3) | 65 (90.3) | - | 0.011 |
Age (year), mean ± SD | 54.9 ± 10.6 | 56.2 ± 10.5 | 0.33 | - | 58.3 ± 11.0 | 56.2 ± 10.5 | 0.25 | - |
Comorbid hepatitis B | - | - | 0.184 | - | - | - | 0.669 | - |
No | 75 (14.1) | 15 (20.8) | - | -0.084 | 12 (16.7) | 15 (20.8) | - | -0.041 |
Yes | 457 (85.9) | 57 (79.2) | - | 0.084 | 60 (83.3) | 57 (79.2) | - | 0.041 |
AFP (μg/L) | - | - | 0.826 | - | - | - | 0.17 | - |
< 400 | 307 (57.7) | 40 (55.6) | - | -0.011 | 49 (68.1) | 40 (55.6) | - | -0.009 |
≥ 400 | 225 (42.3) | 32 (44.4) | - | 0.011 | 23 (31.9) | 32 (44.4) | - | 0.009 |
Primary tumor size (mm) | 66.0 (37.8-100) | 91.5 (57.5-122) | < 0.001 | 0.486 | 85.0 (42.5-120) | 91.5 (57.5-122) | 0.37 | 0.019 |
Number of tumors | - | - | 0.192 | - | - | - | 0.577 | - |
Single | 178 (33.5) | 18 (25.0) | - | -0.045 | 22 (30.6) | 18 (25.0) | - | -0.009 |
Multiple | 354 (66.5) | 54 (75.0) | - | 0.045 | 50 (69.4) | 54 (75.0) | - | 0.009 |
Tumor capsule | - | - | 0.13 | - | - | - | 0.489 | - |
No | 163 (30.6) | 29 (40.3) | - | -0.068 | 24 (33.3) | 29 (40.3) | - | -0.018 |
Yes | 369 (69.4) | 43 (59.7) | - | 0.068 | 48 (66.7) | 43 (59.7) | - | 0.018 |
Tumor thrombus | - | - | 0.001 | - | - | - | 0.225 | - |
No | 408 (76.7) | 42 (58.3) | - | -0.422 | 50 (69.4) | 42 (58.3) | - | -0.036 |
Yes | 124 (23.3) | 30 (41.7) | - | 0.422 | 22 (30.6) | 30 (41.7) | - | 0.036 |
Bilobar distribution of tumor | - | - | 0.446 | - | - | - | 0.867 | - |
No | 320 (60.2) | 39 (54.2) | - | -0.076 | 37 (51.4) | 39 (54.2) | - | -0.006 |
Yes | 212 (39.8) | 33 (45.8) | - | 0.076 | 35 (48.6) | 33 (45.8) | - | 0.006 |
Child-Pugh grade | - | - | 0.098 | - | - | - | 0.366 | - |
A | 488 (91.7) | 71 (98.6) | - | -0.072 | 69 (95.8) | 71 (98.6) | - | -0.014 |
B | 44 (8.3) | 1 (1.4) | - | 0.072 | 3 (4.2) | 1 (1.4) | - | 0.014 |
ECOG-PS | - | - | 0.719 | - | - | - | 0.918 | - |
0 | 456 (85.7) | 60 (83.3) | - | -0.012 | 61 (84.7) | 60 (83.3) | - | -0.003 |
1 | 76 (14.3) | 12 (16.7) | - | 0.012 | 11 (15.3) | 12 (16.7) | - | 0.003 |
BCLC | - | - | 0.042 | - | - | - | 0.58 | - |
B | 304 (57.2) | 32 (44.4) | - | -0.215 | 34 (47.2) | 32 (44.4) | - | -0.014 |
C | 228 (42.8) | 40 (53.6) | - | 0.215 | 38 (52.8) | 40 (53.6) | - | 0.014 |
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analysis of transarterial chemoembolization resistance
Characteristics | Univariate logistic regression analysis | Multivariate logistic regression analysis | ||||
OR | CI | P value | OR | CI | P value | |
Age | 0.98 | 0.97-1 | 0.128 | - | - | - |
Female | 1.15 | 0.59-2.24 | 0.687 | - | - | - |
Comorbid hepatitis B | 1.06 | 0.56-2.01 | 0.858 | - | - | - |
AFP ≥ 400 μg/L | 2.07 | 1.34-3.19 | 0.001 | 1.92 | 1.42-2.95 | 0.06 |
Primary tumor size | 1.01 | 1.01-1.02 | < 0.001 | 1.01 | 1-1.02 | 0.001 |
Number of multiple tumors | 1.96 | 1.21-3.18 | 0.006 | - | - | - |
Tumor capsule | 0.18 | 0.11-0.29 | < 0.001 | 0.29 | 0.17-0.48 | 0.002 |
Tumor thrombus | 4.52 | 2.74-7.47 | 0.03 | - | - | - |
Bilobar distribution of tumor | 2.46 | 1.59-3.8 | < 0.001 | 2.13 | 1.3-3.48 | 0.003 |
Child-Pugh grade B | 2.25 | 1.1-4.62 | 0.027 | 2.14 | 1.23-4.21 | 0.07 |
BCLC-B | 2.56 | 0.92-7.14 | 0.073 | - | - | - |
BCLC-C | 6.9 | 2.39-19.92 | 0.052 | - | - | - |
Table 3 Comparison of all-cause adverse events between the combination group and monotherapy group following propensity score matching, n (%)
Variable | Combination group (n = 72) | Monotherapy group (n = 72) |
Patients with an adverse event from any cause | 48 (66.6) | 35 (48.6) |
Grade 1 or 2 event | 34 (47.2) | 28 (38.9) |
Grade 3 event | 12 (16.7) | 7 (9.7) |
Grade 4 event | 2 (2.7) | 0 |
Grade 5 event | 0 | 0 |
Dose interruption of PD-(L)1 inhibitors | 5 (6.9) | 0 |
Dose interruption of molecular targeted therapies | 7 (9.7) | 0 |
Dose reduction of PD-(L)1 inhibitors | 8 (11.1) | 0 |
Dose reduction of molecular targeted therapies | 12 (16.6) | 0 |
- Citation: Jiao HY, Yan XM, Li JX, Zhang ZG. Combination therapy reduces transarterial chemoembolization resistance in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Clin Oncol 2025; 16(8): 109419
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v16/i8/109419.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i8.109419