Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Aug 24, 2025; 16(8): 109206
Published online Aug 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i8.109206
Published online Aug 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i8.109206
Table 1 Risk of bias and applicability concerns assessment according to QUADAS-2 for included studies
Study | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns | |||||
Patient selection | Index test | Reference standard | Flow and timing | Patient selection | Index test | Reference standard | |
Study 1 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Study 2 | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Study 3 | Low risk | Unclear risk | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Study 4 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Study 5 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Study 6 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear risk | Low risk |
Study 7 | Low Risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Study 8 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear risk | Low risk |
Study 9 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Study 10 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Study 11 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Study 12 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Study 13 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Study 14 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Study 15 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Study 16 | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk |
Table 2 Studies included in QUADAS-2 analysis
Study | Patient selection (risk of bias) | Patient selection (applicability) | Index test (risk of bias) | Index test (applicability) | Reference standard (risk of bias) | Reference standard (applicability) | Flow and timing (risk of bias) |
Study 1 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Study 2 | High | Low | Low | High | Low | Low | Low |
Study 3 | Low | High | Unclear | Low | Low | High | Low |
Study 4 | Low | Unclear | High | Low | Low | Low | High |
Study 5 | Low | Low | Low | Unclear | Low | Low | Low |
Study 6 | Low | High | Low | Unclear | High | High | Low |
Study 7 | Low | Low | High | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Study 8 | Low | High | Unclear | Low | High | Low | Low |
Study 9 | Low | Low | Low | High | Unclear | Unclear | Low |
Study 10 | Low | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Low | Low | Low |
Study 11 | Low | Low | High | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Study 12 | Low | Low | Low | High | Low | Low | Low |
Study 13 | Low | High | High | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Study 14 | Low | Low | Low | High | Low | Low | Low |
Study 15 | Low | High | Low | Low | High | High | Low |
Study 16 | Low | Unclear | Unclear | Low | Low | Unclear | Low |
Table 3 Site-specific diagnostic performance of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in detecting melanoma metastases
Metastatic site | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
Bone | 85-95 | 90-98 |
Liver | 80-90 | 92-97 |
Brain | 90-95 | > 95 |
Lung | 60-70 | 85-90 |
- Citation: Russo A, Marinelli L, Patanè V, Alessandrella M, Pezzella MC, Troiani T, Brancaccio G, Scharf C, Argenziano G, Cappabianca S, Reginelli A. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for cutaneous melanoma staging: A scientific review. World J Clin Oncol 2025; 16(8): 109206
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v16/i8/109206.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i8.109206