Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Apr 24, 2025; 16(4): 99801
Published online Apr 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i4.99801
Published online Apr 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i4.99801
Table 1 Biological data and comorbidity in the transanal drainage tube and non-transanal drainage tube groups, n (%)
Variables | All patients (n = 68) | Non-TDT (n = 25) | TDT (n = 43) | Statistic | P value |
Sex | χ² = 1.06 | 0.304 | |||
Male | 46 (67.65) | 15 (60.00) | 31 (72.09) | ||
Female | 22 (32.35) | 10 (40.00) | 12 (27.91) | ||
Age (years) | 62.44 ± 12.04 | 60.64 ± 12.45 | 63.49 ± 11.81 | t = -0.94 | 0.351 |
Preoperative albumin (g/L) | 41.00 (38.00, 44.00) | 41.00 (38.00, 43.00) | 41.00 (38.50, 44.00) | Z = -0.03 | 0.98 |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 23.71 ± 2.95 | 23.55 ± 3.21 | 23.80 ± 2.82 | t = -0.34 | 0.736 |
Comorbidity | 35 (51.47) | 12 (48.00) | 23 (53.49) | χ² = 0.19 | 0.662 |
Diabetes | 13 (19.12) | 5 (20.00) | 8 (18.60) | χ² = 0.00 | 1 |
Hypertension | 22 (32.35) | 6 (24.00) | 16 (37.21) | χ² = 1.26 | 0.262 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 2 (2.94) | 0 (0.00) | 2 (4.65) | - | 0.528 |
Cardiovascular | 10 (14.71) | 4 (16.00) | 6 (13.95) | - | 1 |
Hepatic insufficiency | 2 (2.94) | 1 (4.00) | 1 (2.33) | - | 1 |
Surgical approach | χ² = 0.39 | 0.531 | |||
Laparoscope | 62 (91.18) | 24 (96.00) | 38 (88.37) | ||
Robot assisted | 6 (8.82) | 1 (4.00) | 5 (11.63) | ||
Distance of tumor from the anus (cm) | 7.00 (5.00, 8.00) | 7.00 (5.00, 7.50) | 7.00 (5.00, 8.00) | Z = -0.08 | 0.933 |
Tumor diameter (cm) | 4.00 (3.00, 4.00) | 3.00 (3.00, 4.00) | 4.00 (3.00, 4.00) | Z = -1.29 | 0.196 |
American Society of Anesthesiologists | χ² = 0.56 | 0.455 | |||
1-2 | 48 (70.59) | 19 (76.00) | 29 (67.44) | ||
3 | 20 (29.41) | 6 (24.00) | 14 (32.56) | ||
TNM | χ² = 1.25 | 0.536 | |||
I | 16 (23.53) | 4 (16.00) | 12 (27.91) | ||
II | 32 (47.06) | 13 (52.00) | 19 (44.19) | ||
III | 20 (29.41) | 8 (32.00) | 12 (27.91) | ||
Diverting stoma | 21 (30.88) | 7 (28.00) | 14 (32.56) | χ² = 0.15 | 0.695 |
Duration of anal canal treatment (days) | 7.00 (5.00, 10.50) |
Table 2 Intention-to-treat analysis of the transanal drainage tube and non-transanal drainage tube groups, n (%)
Variables | All patients (n = 68) | non-TDT (n = 25) | TDT (n = 43) | Statistic | P value |
Operation time (minute) | 240.00 (203.75, 296.50) | 240.00 (200.00, 296.00) | 240.00 (212.50, 289.00) | Z = -0.03 | 0.975 |
Distance of anastomosis from the anus (cm) | 4.00 (3.00, 6.00) | 4.00 (3.00, 5.00) | 4.00 (2.90, 6.00) | Z = -0.45 | 0.653 |
Intraoperative bleeding (mL) | 50.00 (50.00, 100.00) | 100.00 (50.00, 100.00) | 50.00 (50.00, 100.00) | Z = -1.43 | 0.152 |
Reoperation | 21 (30.88) | 12 (48.00) | 9 (20.93) | χ² = 5.43 | 0.02 |
Bacterial cultures of abdominal drainage fluid negative (days) | 9.00 (6.00, 16.00) | 10.00 (7.00, 16.00) | 8.00 (5.00, 15.50) | Z = -0.92 | 0.355 |
Neutrophil number back to normal (days) | 8.50 (5.00, 14.25) | 10.00 (5.00, 15.00) | 7.00 (5.00, 13.50) | Z = -0.53 | 0.596 |
Procalcitonin < 0.25 (days) | 9.00 (5.00, 14.00) | 10.00 (7.00, 14.00) | 7.00 (5.00, 13.00) | Z = -0.61 | 0.545 |
Recovery enteral nutrition (days) | 6.50 (3.00, 13.00) | 8.00 (5.00, 10.00) | 6.00 (2.00, 13.00) | Z = -1.45 | 0.146 |
Discharge albumin (g/L) | 34.00 (32.00, 36.00) | 35.00 (32.00, 36.00) | 33.00 (31.00, 35.00) | Z = -1.48 | 0.14 |
Use of antibiotics (days) | 10.00 (6.00, 16.00) | 10.00 (7.00, 18.00) | 10.00 (6.00, 15.00) | Z = -0.79 | 0.429 |
Cost (RMB) | 109205.93 ± 57366.51 | 116891.43 ± 65540.44 | 104737.62 ± 52341.15 | t = 0.84 | 0.404 |
Discharge after surgery (days) | 21.00 (12.00, 29.00) | 23.00 (15.00, 32.00) | 19.00 (10.00, 28.00) | Z = -1.64 | 0.102 |
Death | 1 (1.5) | 1 (2.4) | 0 | - | 1 |
Table 3 Incidence of long-term preservation of continuity, n (%)
Variables | All patients (n = 68) | non-TDT (n = 25) | TDT (n = 43) | Statistic | P value |
Long-term preservation of continuity | χ² = 9.18 | 0.002 | |||
No | 25 (36.76) | 15 (60.00) | 10 (23.26) | ||
Yes | 43 (63.24) | 10 (40.00) | 33 (76.74) |
Table 4 Incidence of low anterior resection syndrome, n (%)
Variables | All patients (n = 43) | non-TDT (n = 10) | TDT (n = 33) | Statistic | P value |
LARS | χ² = 3.86 | 0.049 | |||
No | 18 (41.86) | 1 (10.00) | 17 (51.52) | ||
Yes | 25 (58.14) | 9 (90.00) | 16 (48.48) | ||
LARS | - | 0.059 | |||
No | 18 (41.86) | 1 (10.00) | 17 (51.52) | ||
Minor | 14 (32.56) | 5 (50.00) | 9 (27.27) | ||
Major | 11 (25.58) | 4 (40.00) | 7 (21.21) |
- Citation: Cao YK, Yang SL, Wei ZQ. Is the use of a transanal drainage tube effective in treating anastomotic leakage for mid-low rectal cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2025; 16(4): 99801
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v16/i4/99801.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i4.99801