Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Apr 24, 2025; 16(4): 102297
Published online Apr 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i4.102297
Table 1 Classification and grading criteria for neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract and hepatopancreatobiliary organs
Terminology
Differentiation
Grade
Mitotic rate (mitoses/2 mm2)
Ki-67 index
NET, G1Well differentiatedLow< 2< 3%
NET, G2Intermediate2-203%-20%
NET, G3High> 20> 20%
NEC, small-cell type (SCNEC)Poorly differentiatedHigh > 20> 20%
NEC, large-cel type (LCNEC)> 20> 20%
MiNENWell or poorly differentiatedVariableVariableVariable
Table 2 Clinical trials in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors using immune checkpoint inhibitors
No.
Trial name/NCT number
Phase
Interventions
Population characteristics
ORR (%)1
mPFS (month)
mOS (month)
1KEYNOTE-028 NCT02054806[13]IbPemprolizumabCohort A7: 16 patients with PD-L1-negative, well or moderately differentiated pancreatic NETs6.3%4.537.8
Cohort A6: 25 patients with PD-L1-positive, locally advanced or metastatic carcinoids (lung, gut, and other locations)12%5.516.2
2KEYNOTE-158 NCT02628067[14]IIPemprolizumab107 patients with heavily pretreated, well-differentiated, progressive NETs3.7% (7.5% in pancreatic NET subgroup)4.124.2
3NCT02939651[15]IIPemprolizumab29 patients with advanced G3 NETs/NECs (48% patients had GI primaries) progressing on platinum-based chemotherapy3.4% (1 patient)8.8620.43
4PLANET NCT03043664[16]Ib/IIPemprolizumab + Lanreotide Depot22 patients with nonresectable, recurrent or metastatic, well or moderately differentiated GEP-NETs0.045% (39% stable disease, 52% progressive disease)5.0428.6
5NCT03136055[17]IIPembrolizumab/Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy (Irinotecan/ Paclitaxel)36 patients with extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (28% in Pem-only and 73% in Pem + chemo)7%; 5%1.8; 27.8; 4.8
6NCT02955069[18]IISpartalizumab32 patients with well-differentiated GI NETs, 33 patients with pancreatic NETs, 21 patients with poorly-differentiated GEP-NECs3.1%, 3.0%, and 4.8%, respectively3.8 in well-differentiated NETs; 1.8 in NECs23.4 in well-differentiated NETs; 6.8 in NECs
7DART SWOG 1609 NCT02834013[19]IIIpilimumab + Nivolumab32 patients, of whom 15 with GI-NENs and 6 with lung-NENsOverall: 25%; 44% in nonpancreatic high-grade NEC and 0% in low-intermediate grade tumors411
8CA209-538 NCT02923934[20]IIIpilimumab + Nivolumab29 patients with advanced, any grade NENs (including atypical bronchial carcinoid and high-grade pan-NENs)43% of patients with pan-NENs achieved an objective response4.8 (in whole cohort)14.8 (in whole cohort)
9NCT03074513[21]IIAtezolizumab + Bevacizumab 40 patients with advanced, progressive grade 1 to 2 NETs (20 with pancreatic NETs and 20 with extra-pancreatic NETs)20% in the pancreatic NET cohort; 15% in the extra-pancreatic NET cohort19.6 and 14.9, respectively-
10DUNE NCT03095274[22]IDurvalumab + Tremelimumab123 patients with advanced or metastatic GEP/Lung NENs or NENs of unknown primary11.1% in lung NENs (cohort 1), 0% in G1-2 GI NETs (cohort 2), 6.3% in G1-2 pancreatic NETs (cohort 3), 9.1% in G3 GEP-NENs (cohort 4)5.6, 5.8, 5.5 and 2.4, respectivelyNot reached, 29.5, 23.8, 5.9, respectively
11NCT03167853[23]IbToripalimab40 patients with NENs (of whom 9 with pan-NENs)13.0% in GI NENs, 22.2% in pan-NENs, 37.5% in nondigestive NENs15.4 (for TMB-high subgroup), 2.1 (for TMB-low subgroup)Not reached (for TMB-high subgroup), 227 (for TMB-low subgroup)
12NET-001/NET-002 NCT03278405 NCT03278379[24]IIAvelumab27 patients with GEP NENs or from bronchial primary, (10 G2-3 NETs in NET-001, 17 NECs in NET-002)0% (33% stable disease)3.314.2
13AVENEC NCT03352934[25]IIAvelumab60 patients with G3 NET (n = 22) or NEC (n = 38) of any origin20% (9 stable disease, 3 partial response)2.14.2
14CABOAVENEC NCT05289856[25]IIAvelumab + Cabozantinib19 patients (12 with G3 NET, 7 with NEC)47.4%12.1-