Sun AH, Zhang XY, Huang YY, Chen L, Wang Q, Jiang XC. Prognostic value and predictive model of tumor markers in stage I to III gastric cancer patients. World J Clin Oncol 2024; 15(8): 1033-1047 [PMID: 39193154 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i8.1033]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Xiao-Cong Jiang, Chief Doctor, Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, No. 41 Eling North Road, Huizhou 516001, Guangdong Province, China. onion1021@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Oncology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Oncol. Aug 24, 2024; 15(8): 1033-1047 Published online Aug 24, 2024. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i8.1033
Table 1 Patient demographics and clinicopathologic features, n (%)
Variables
Patients (n = 1236)
Gender
Male
937 (75.8)
Female
299 (24.2)
Age
< 65
685 (55.4)
≥ 65
551 (44.6)
Drinking
Yes
269 (21.8)
No
967 (78.2)
Smoking
Yes
266 (21.5)
No
970 (78.5)
Operation methods
Open surgery
1103 (89.2)
Laparoscopic surgery
133 (10.8)
Hospitalization time
< 15 days
539 (43.6)
≥ 15 days
697 (56.4)
Clinical stage
I
288 (23.3)
II
272 (22.0)
III
676 (54.7)
T stage
T1
224 (18.1)
T2
127 (10.3)
T3
174 (14.1)
T4
711 (57.5)
N stage
N0
504 (40.8)
N1
203 (16.4)
N2
227 (18.4)
N3
302 (24.4)
Tumor location
Cardia
633 (51.2)
Gastric body
239 (19.3)
Antrum of stomach
364 (29.5)
Pathological type
Adenocarcinoma
1168 (94.5)
Mucinous adenocarcinoma
42 (3.4)
Squamous cell carcinoma
15 (1.2)
Signet ring cell carcinoma
11 (0.9)
Degree of differentiation
Well
19 (1.5)
High
42 (3.4)
Medium
300 (24.3)
Moderate to low
330 (26.7)
Poor
545 (44.1)
Borrmann type
I
155 (12.5)
II
287 (23.2)
III
737 (59.6)
IV
57 (4.7)
Size
< 5cm
690 (55.8)
≥ 5cm
546 (44.2)
Survival status
Alive
842 (68.1)
Dead
394 (31.9)
Table 2 The association of demographics and clinicopathologic characteristics with four serum tumor markers
Variables
AFP
P value
CEA
P value
CA125
P value
CA19-9
P value
Positive (n = 1043)
Negative (n = 193)
Positive (n = 904)
Negative (n = 332)
Positive (n = 858)
Negative (n = 378)
Positive (n = 969)
Negative (n = 267)
Gender
0.200
0.072
0.072
0.809
Male
798
139
673
264
663
274
736
201
Female
245
54
231
68
195
104
233
66
Age
0.753
0.002
0.214
0.144
< 65
576
109
526
159
486
199
548
137
≥ 65
467
84
378
173
372
179
421
130
Clinical stage
0.034
0.000
0.000
0.000
I
257
31
263
25
242
46
278
10
II
227
45
208
64
196
76
240
32
III
559
117
433
243
420
256
451
225
T stage
0.855
0.000
0.000
0.000
T1
193
31
208
16
181
43
214
10
T2
108
19
104
23
110
17
121
6
T3
146
28
116
58
109
65
128
46
T4
596
115
476
235
458
253
506
205
N stage
0.005
0.000
0.000
0.000
N0
446
58
430
74
392
112
462
42
N1
171
32
150
53
145
58
166
37
N2
185
42
151
76
149
78
152
75
N3
241
61
173
129
172
130
189
113
Tumor location
0.082
0.000
0.221
0.041
Cardia
537
96
433
200
444
189
485
148
Gastric body
191
48
182
57
155
84
182
57
Antrum of stomach
315
49
289
75
259
105
302
62
Pathological type
1.000
0.324
0.417
0.045
Adenocarcinoma
985
183
858
310
814
354
919
249
Other
58
10
46
22
44
24
50
18
Degree of differentiation
0.606
0.049
0.014
0.002
Well, high, medium
308
53
278
83
269
92
303
58
Moderate to low, poor
735
140
626
249
589
286
666
209
Borrmann type
0.220
0.000
0.029
0.000
I and II
381
61
353
89
324
118
391
51
III and IV
662
132
551
243
534
260
578
216
Size
0.305
0.000
0.000
0.000
< 5
589
101
555
135
528
162
590
100
≥ 5
454
92
349
197
330
216
379
167
Survival status
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Alive
736
106
686
156
646
196
728
114
Dead
307
87
218
176
212
182
241
153
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis for overall survival
Variables
OS
HR (95%CI)
P value
Univariate analysis
Gender (male vs female)
0.922 (0.729-1.165)
0.496
Age (< 65 vs ≥ 65)
1.315 (1.080-1.604)
0.007
Clinical stage
I
1 (Reference)
II
2.876 (1.735-4.768)
0.000
III
8.712 (5.601-13.552)
0.000
T stage
T1
1 (Reference)
T2
1.693 (0.889-3.227)
0.019
T3
4.438 (2.634-7.478)
0.000
T4
6.330 (3.981-10.065)
0.000
N stage
N0
1 (Reference)
N1
2.330 (1.667-3.257)
0.000
N2
3.239 (2.383-4.401)
0.000
N3
5.201 (3.957-6.836)
0.000
Location
Cardia
1 (Reference)
Gastric body
1.306 (1.025-1.664)
0.031
Antrum of stomach
1.698 (1.276-2.261)
0.000
Pathological type (adenocarcinoma vs other)
1.209 (0.807-1.813)
0.358
Differentiation (well, high and medium vs moderate to low and poor)
1.776 (1.392-2.265)
0.000
Borrmann type (III vs other)
0.579 (0.462-0.724)
0.000
Size (< 5 vs ≥ 5)
0.403 (0.329-0.494)
0.000
AFP (positive vs negative)
1.929 (1.520-2.448)
0.000
CEA (positive vs negative)
3.155 (2.584-3.851)
0.000
CA125 (positive vs negative)
2.521 (2.067-3.074)
0.000
CA19-9 (positive vs negative)
3.489 (2.847-4.276)
0.000
Multivariate analysis
Age (< 65 vs ≥ 65)
1.225 (0.999-1.501)
0.052
Clinical stage
I
1 (Reference)
II
2.102 (1.248-3.540)
0.005
III
4.860 (2.988-7.907)
0.000
Location
Cardia
1 (Reference)
Gastric body
1.531 (1.187-1.976)
0.051
Antrum of stomach
1.092 (0.847-1.406)
0.498
Differentiation (well, high and medium vs moderate to low and poor)
1.212 (0.940-1.564)
0.139
Borrmann type (III vs other)
0.873 (0.688-1.108)
0.265
Size (< 5 vs ≥ 5)
1.269 (1.020-1.578)
0.032
AFP (positive vs negative)
1.728 (1.359-2.198)
0.000
CEA (positive vs negative)
2.037 (1.646-2.522)
0.000
CA125 (positive vs negative)
1.739 (1.416-2.135)
0.000
CA19-9 (positive vs negative)
1.910 (1.535-2.377)
0.000
Table 4 Multivariate cox regression analysis and assigned scores about four tumor markers
Variables
OS
HR (95%CI)
P value
β
Reference value
Score
AFP (positive vs negative)
1.722 (1.355-2.190)
0.000
0.543
0.543
1
CEA (positive vs negative)
2.311 (1.877-2.847)
0.000
0.838
0.543
2
CA125 (positive vs negative)
1.957 (1.595-2.401)
0.000
0.671
0.543
1
CA19-9 (positive vs negative)
2.504 (2.021-3.103)
0.000
0.920
0.543
2
Table 5 The association of demographics and clinicopathologic characteristics with different scores
Variables
0 (n = 537)
1 (n = 219)
2 (n = 181)
3 (n = 139)
4 (n = 59)
5 (n = 71)
6 (n = 30)
P value
Gender
0.506
Male
413
158
136
104
50
55
21
Female
124
61
45
35
9
16
9
Age
0.179
< 65
316
124
98
68
31
36
12
≥ 65
221
95
83
71
28
35
18
Clinical stage
0.000
I
197
51
27
10
3
0
0
II
120
66
36
33
10
6
1
III
220
102
118
96
46
65
29
T stage
0.000
T1
147
48
15
10
3
0
1
T2
75
22
20
9
0
1
0
T3
56
37
27
25
13
13
3
T4
259
112
119
95
43
57
26
N stage
0.000
N0
292
96
64
36
11
4
1
N1
94
40
18
27
8
15
1
N2
73
37
44
32
14
17
10
N3
78
46
55
44
26
35
18
Tumor location
0.010
Cardia
268
95
97
77
37
41
18
Gastric body
93
58
28
26
11
14
9
Antrum of stomach
176
66
56
36
11
16
3
Pathological type
0.236
Adenocarcinoma
514
202
172
133
54
64
29
Other
23
17
9
6
5
7
1
Degree of differentiation
0.013
Well, high, medium
174
64
53
41
16
8
5
Moderate to low, poor
363
155
128
98
43
63
25
Borrmann type
0.000
I and II
241
80
42
48
10
15
6
III and IV
296
139
139
91
49
56
24
Size
0.000
< 5
364
121
91
66
17
22
9
≥ 5
173
98
90
73
42
49
21
Survival status
Alive
433
161
128
75
27
16
2
Dead
104
58
53
64
32
55
28
Table 6 Further comparison of variables with different score
Variables
P value
Clinical stage
T stage
N stage
Location
Differentiation
Borrmann type
Size
Survival status
0 vs 1
0.001
0.027
0.036
0.016
0.437
0.035
0.001
0.032
0 vs 2
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.678
0.461
0.000
0.000
0.007
0 vs 3
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.296
0.541
0.034
0.000
0.000
0 vs 4
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.077
0.464
0.000
0.000
0.000
0 vs 5
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.218
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0 vs 6
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.020
0.104
0.007
0.000
0.000
1 vs 2
0.001
0.001
0.005
0.021
0.990
0.005
0.365
0.575
1 vs 3
0.000
0.001
0.005
0.071
0.956
0.725
0.160
0.000
1 vs 4
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.030
0.872
0.005
0.000
0.000
1 vs 5
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.106
0.002
0.020
0.000
0.000
1 vs 6
0.000
0.002
0.000
0.061
0.193
0.100
0.011
0.000
2 vs 3
0.092
0.481
0.061
0.541
0.967
0.033
0.653
0.002
2 vs 4
0.095
0.032
0.072
0.187
0.869
0.366
0.004
0.001
2 vs 5
0.000
0.004
0.000
0.373
0.003
0.867
0.007
0.000
2 vs 6
0.002
0.101
0.001
0.026
0.188
0.817
0.048
0.000
3 vs 4
0.445
0.206
0.316
0.521
0.864
0.016
0.018
0.351
3 vs 5
0.001
0.036
0.003
0.867
0.003
0.056
0.027
0.000
3 vs 6
0.007
0.202
0.001
0.116
0.180
0.136
0.105
0.000
4 vs 5
0.045
0.180
0.114
0.824
0.024
0.657
0.849
0.008
4 vs 6
0.069
0.329
0.065
0.348
0.306
0.774
0.907
0.000
5 vs 6
0.671
0.282
0.133
0.252
0.520
0.899
0.922
0.086
Table 7 Means and 95%CI for overall survival in patients with different stages and different score of gastric cancer
Stage
Score
Mean overall survival time (months)
Estimate
SE
95%CI
I
0 (n = 197)
56.200
0.516
55.188-57.212
1 (n = 51)
56.893
0.777
55.371-58.416
2 (n = 27)
52.090
2.283
47.615-56.564
3 (n = 10)
44.700
3.985
36.889-52.511
Overall (n = 285)
55.980
0.456
55.086-56.874
II
0 (n = 120)
54.133
0.946
52.279-55.987
1 (n = 66)
49.802
1.778
46.316-53.288
2 (n = 36)
53.627
1.320
51.039-56.214
3 (n = 33)
44.903
3.293
38.449-51.357
4 (n = 10)
38.400
6.442
25.773-51.027
Overall (n = 265)
51.550
0.845
49.893-53.207
III
0 (n = 220)
46.927
1.052
44.864-48.989
1 (n = 102)
44.814
1.727
41.429-48.199
2 (n = 118)
43.357
1.661
40.102-46.613
3 (n = 96)
35.471
2.129
31.298-39.645
4 (n = 48)
31.096
3.157
24.909-37.283
5 (n = 71)
20.462
2.271
16.010-24.913
6 (n = 30)
10.966
2.240
6.576-15.355
Overall (n = 676)
39.422
0.792
37.870-40.974
Citation: Sun AH, Zhang XY, Huang YY, Chen L, Wang Q, Jiang XC. Prognostic value and predictive model of tumor markers in stage I to III gastric cancer patients. World J Clin Oncol 2024; 15(8): 1033-1047