Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Oncol. Feb 24, 2022; 13(2): 71-100
Published online Feb 24, 2022. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i2.71
Table 1 Non-hormonal treatments (Classic moisturizers and lubricants and innovative preparations) in breast cancer survivors: Summary of studies and their outcomes
Ref.
Yr
n1
Design
Treatment
Conclusion
Loprinzi et al[119] 199745A double-blind, crossover, randomized clinical trialVaginal lubricating preparation, (Replens®)Both Replens and the placebo appear to substantially ameliorate vaginal dryness and dyspareunia in breast cancer survivors
Lee et al[129]201144 vs 42Randomised controlled trial, double blindedpH balanced gel vs placebo for 12 wkVaginal pH balanced gel could relieve vaginal symptoms
Juraskova et al[137]201325Prospective, observational studypolycarbophil-based vaginal moisturizer + olive oil as a lubricant during intercourseSignificant improvements in dyspareunia, sexual function, and quality of life over time
Goetsch et al[130,131]2014 201546Double-blind rct4% aqueous lidocaine vs saline Significative and safe reduction in dyspareunia
Hickey et al[128]2016In a single-center, randomized, double-blind, ab/ba crossover designWater- vs silicone-based lubricantsTotal sexual discomfort was lower after use of silicone-based lubricant than water-based
Juliato et al[126]201725 vs 25Randomised trialPolyacrylic acid vs lubricantPolyacrylic acid was superior to lubricant
Marschalek et al[136]201711 vs 11Randomised controlled trial, double blinded pilot studyVaginal lactobacillus capsules vs placeboLactobacillus improves microbiota in BCSs
Hersant et al[139]201820Prospective, comparative (before/after) pilot studyA-PRP and evaluated at 0,1,3 and 6 moA-PRP improves vaginal mucosa in 6 mo treatment according VHI criteria
Chatsiproios et al[125]2019128Open, prospective, multicentre, observational study.oil-in-water emulsion during 28 dThis treatment seems to improve VVA symptoms with a short treatment
Carter et al[122]2021101Single-arm, prospective longitudinal trialHyaluronic acid (HLA) vaginal gel for 12 wkHLA moisturization improved vulvovaginal health/sexual function of cancer survivors
Table 2 Systemic hormonal treatments in breast cancer survivors: summary of studies and their outcomes
Ref.
Yr
n1
Design
Treatment
Conclusion
Holmberg et al[147,149]2004 2008221 vs 221 Randomized, non-placebo-controlled noninferiority trialOral estradiol hemihydrate and Norethisterone (cyclic or continuous) vs controlIn BCSs, an increased risk of new breast cancer events and adverse events were observed after 2 yr of therapy (HR = 2.4)
von Schoultz et al[150]2005188 vs 190Randomized, non-placebo-controlled noninferiority trial2 mg estradiol for 21 d with addition of 10 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate for last 10 d; or 2 mg estradiol for 84 d with 20 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate for last 10 d; or 2 mg estradiol valerate dailyNo increased risk of breast cancer recurrence; trial was closed early. So, HT doses of estrogen and progestogen and treatment regimens for menopausal hormone therapy may be associated with the recurrence of breast cancer
Kenemans et al[153]20091556 vs 1542Prospective randomized placebo controlledTibolone 2.5 mg daily or placeboTrial was closed early. Tibolone had a significantly increased risk of breast cancer recurrence
Cai et al[168]20201728 vs 3456Retrospective matched cohort studyIncidence rate in ospemifene users vs untreated patientsNo differences were observed in the BC incidence and recurrence rates in ospemifene users compared with matched controls
Table 3 Local hormonal treatments in breast cancer survivors: summary of studies and their outcomes
Ref.
Yr
n1
Design
Treatment
Conclusion
Dew et al[178]200369Retrospective Cohort studyEstriol 0.5 mg cream and pessaries (33); Estradiol 25 μgtablets (n = 33)VET does not seem to be associated with increased RR of BC
Kendall et al[190]20057Prospective before-after analysisEstradiol 25 mg daily for 2 wkVaginal estradiol tablet significantly raises systemic estradiol levels. This reverses the estradiol suppression achieved by AIs in women with BC and is contraindicated
Biglia N et al[179]201026Prospective studyEstriol cream 0.25 mg (n = 10) or estradiol tablets 12.5 microg (n = 8) polycarbophil-based moisturizer 2.5 g (Replens®) (n = 8)VET is effective in improving symptoms and objective evaluations in BCSs
Pfeifer et al[180] 201110Prospective before-after analysis0.5 mg vaginal estriol daily for 2 wkIncrease in FHS and LH may indicate systemic estradiol effects
Whiterby et al[201]201121Phase I/II pilot Before-After studyTestosterone cream daily for 28 d. 300/ 150 μgVaginal testosterone was associated with improved signs and symptoms of vaginal atrophy related to AI therapy without increasing estradiol or testosterone levels
Wills et al[49]201224 vs 24Prospective clinical trial25 mcg estradiol vaginal tablet or ring vs controlVET treatment increases E2 levels. Should be used with caution
Le Ray et al[187]201213479TAM (n = 10806) or AIs (n = 2673)Retrospective, nested case-control studyVaginal cream and tablets containing estrogenUse of VET is not associated with increase in BC recurrence in those treated with TMX or AI
Dahir et al[202]201413Pilot before-after studyTestosterone cream daily for 28 d, 300 μgImprovement in FSFI scores
Donders et al[181]201416Open label bicentric phase I pharmacokinetic study0.03 mg Estriol + LactobacillusEstriol + Lactobacillusis safe in BCpatients andimprovessymptoms
Melisko et al[204]201669Randomised non-comparative studyEstradiol ring 7.5 ng vs Testosterone cream at 1% concentration: 1.5 mg/wkTransient increase in E2 that finally reached normal levels. Meets the primary safety endpoint
Davis et al[203]201844Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trialTestosterone cream daily for 26 week/ 300 μg vs placeboTestosterone improves sexual test items compared to placebo
Table 4 Vaginal laser therapy in breast cancer survivors: Summary of studies and their outcomes.
Ref.
Yr
n1
Design
Treatment
Conclusion
Pieralli et al[223] 201650Prospective Before-after study3 sessions of Fractional Microablative CO2 Laser every 30 dThe treatment seems to be feasible and effective
Pagano et al[221]201626Observational retrospective study3 sessions of Fractional Microablative CO2 Laser every 30 dThe treatment seems to be effective and with good tolerance
Gambacciani et al[218]201743Pilot before-after study3 sessions of Vaginal Erbium Laser every 30 dThe treatment seems to be effective
Pagano et al[214]201882Observational retrospective study3 sessions of Fractional Microablative CO2 Laser every 30 dThe treatment seems to be effective
Mothes et al[225]201816Retrospective study1 session of Vaginal Erbium YAG LaserThe treatment seems to be effective
Pearson et al[222]201926Single-arm pilot study Before-After study3 sessions of Fractional Microablative CO2 Laser every 30 dThe treatment seems to improve sexual function and vaginal atrophy
Areas et al[224]201924Open, prospective study3 sessions of Vaginal Erbium YAG Laser every 30 dThe treatment seems to improve sexual function and vaginal atrophy
Table 5 Treatment options for management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause in specific patient populations: Consensus recommendations of the The North American Menopause Society[65]
General guidelines
Individualize treatment, taking into account risk of recurrence, severity of symptoms, effect on QoL, and personal preferences
Moisturizers and lubricants, pelvic floor physical therapy, and dilator therapy are firstline treatments
Involve treating oncologist in decision making when considering the use of local hormone therapies1
Ospemifene, an oral SERM, has not been studied in women at risk for breast cancer and is not FDAapproved for use in women with or at high risk for breast cancer
Offlabel use of compounded vaginal testosterone or estriol is not recommended
Laser therapy may be considered in women who prefer a nonhormonal approach; women must be counseled regarding lack of longterm safety and efficacy data
Women at high risk for breast cancer2
Local hormone therapies are a reasonable option for women who have failed nonhormonal treatment
Observational data do not suggest increased risk of breast cancer with systemic or local estrogen therapies beyond baseline risk
Women with ERpositive breast cancers on tamoxifen
Tamoxifen is a SERM that acts as an ER antagonist in breast tissue; small transient elevations in serum hormone levels noted with local hormone therapies in women on tamoxifen are less concerning than in women on AIs
Women with persistent, severe symptoms who have failed nonhormonal treatments and who have factors suggesting a low risk of recurrence may be candidates for local hormone therapy
Women with ERpositive breast cancers on AI
AIs block conversion of androgen to estrogen, resulting in undetectable serum estradiol levels; transient elevations in estradiol levels may be of concern
GSM symptoms are often more severe
Women with severe symptoms who have failed nonhormonal treatments may still be candidates for local hormone therapies after review with the woman’s oncologist vs consider switching to tamoxifen
Women with triplenegative breast cancers
Theoretically, the use of local hormone therapy in women with a history of triplenegative disease is reasonable, but data are lacking
Women with metastatic disease
QoL, comfort, and intimacy may be a priority for many women with metastatic disease
Use of local hormone therapy in women with metastatic disease and probable extended survival may be viewed differently than in women with limited survival when QOL may be a priority