Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Oncol. Feb 24, 2022; 13(2): 147-158
Published online Feb 24, 2022. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i2.147
Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics
Characteristics
Number of patients (%)
Total24
Median age (range), yr58 (36-77)
Sex
Male15 (62.5)
Female9 (37.5)
ECOG at TPEx treatment initiation
0-122 (91.7)
22 (8.3)
Smoking history
Never6 (25)
Current or former13 (54.2)
NS5 (20.8)
Alcohol consumption
Occasional or regular8 (33.3)
None7 (29.2)
NS9 (37.5)
Primary tumor site
Larynx7 (29.2)
Oropharynx6 (25)
Oral cavity5 (20.8)
Hypopharynx1 (4.2)
Other5 (20.8)
Previous treatment
Concomitant chemoradiotherapy only8 (33.3)
Surgery only5 (20.8)
Surgery + concomitant chemoradiotherapy5 (20.8)
Surgery + radiotherapy3 (12.5)
Radiotherapy only1 (4.2)
No2 (8.3)
Extent of disease at TPEx treatment initiation
Locoregional recurrence only14 (58.3)
Locoregional recurrence + distant metastasis5 (20.8)
Metastatic disease5 (20.8)
Time from initial diagnosis to recurrence(Median, IQR), mo16.2 (5.4-37.5)
Metastatic or unresectable disease at diagnosis11 (45.8)
Table 2 Summary of treatment response

TPEx (n = 24)
Type of response, n (%)
Complete3 (12.5)
Partial12 (50)
Stable disease6 (25)
Progression1 (4.2)
Nonassessable2 (8.3)
Objective response rate - % of patients (95%CI)162.5
Disease-control rate - % of patients (95%CI)287.5
Time to response – mo3
Median (95%CI)2.4 (1.3-3.5)
Duration of response – mo4
Median (95%CI)5.1 (3.0-7.2)
Table 3 Univariate prognostic factor analyses for TPEx progression-free survival
Variable
HR (95%CI)
P value
Median PFS (95%CI)
ECOG(0 vs 1-2)0.91 (0.30-2.80)0.876.9 mo (5.1-8.8) vs 6.8 mo (4.7-8.9)
Primary tumor site (Hypo/oropharyngeal vs Others)0.15 (0.02-1.17)0.0422 mo (19.9-25.1) vs 6.7 mo (4.7-8.9)
Response (Responders vs Nonresponders)0.34 (0.12–0.97)0.048.5 mo (5.5-11.5) vs 4.5 mo (2.5-6.5)
Extent of disease at TPEx initiation (Locoregionally advanced vs Metastatic)0.95 (0.33-2.85)0.956.9 mo (4.2-9.7) vs 6.8 mo (5.6-7.8)
Relapse-free survival of the primary treatment (≤ 24 vs > 24 mo)10.37 (0.11-1.21)0.096.1 mo (3.6-8.6) vs 8.5 mo (4.5-12.5)
Previous treatment2(Multimodality vs Unimodality)0.44 (0.14–1.41)0.177.5 mo (6.3-8.7) vs 6.1 mo (2.7-9.4)
Treatment interruption, discontinuation, or dose reduction (Yes vs No)1.15 (0.39-3.41)0.806.9 mo (6.4-7.4) vs 6.8 mo (5.0-8.5)
Adverse events (Grade 1-2 vs 3-4) 0.74 (0.23-2.44)0.626.9 mo (5.2-8.6) vs 6.7 mo (0.3-13.9)
Table 4 Adverse events of any cause during TPEx treatment
Event, n (%)TPEx (n = 24)
Any grade
Grade 3
Grade 4
Any treatment-related adverse event118 (75)6 (25)0
Hematological
Febrile neutropenia3 (12.5)3 (12.5)0
Anemia3 (12.5)0
Hyponatremia and/or hypokalemia3 (12.5)2 (8.3)0
Hypomagnesemia2 (8.3)1 (4.2)0
Thrombocytopenia1 (4.2)00
Nonhematological
Acne-like rash8 (33.3)00
Nausea - vomiting4 (16.7)1 (4.2)0
Asthenia4 (16.7)1 (4.2)0
Diarrhea2 (8.3)00
Renal failure1 (4.2)1 (4.2)0
Hypersensitivity1 (4.2)0
Oral mucositis1 (4.2)00
Any serious adverse event2-5 (20.8)0
Treatment-related death0--
Event leading to interruption of any treatment component33 (12.5)--
Chemotherapy2 (8.3)--
Cetuximab1 (4.2)--
Event leading to discontinuation of any treatment component32 (8.3)--
Chemotherapy2 (8.3)--
Cetuximab0
Event leading to dose reduction2 (8.3)--
Table 5 Selected studies that assessed first-line TPEx schema in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer
Ref.
Study type
n
ORR (%)
PFS (mo)
OS (mo)
Grade 3, adverse events (%)
Grade 4, adverse events (%)
Guigay et al[19]Phase 254157.66.014.57333
Guigay et al[14]Phase 25444.46.2149322
Bossi et al[15]Phase 2120151.77.0117333
Even et al[21]Retrospective30876.013.61710
Fuchs et al[22]Retrospective38506.310.8100