Herrero M, Ciérvide R, Calle-Purón ME, Valero J, Buelga P, Rodriguez-Bertos I, Benassi L, Montero A. Macrometastasis at selective lymph node biopsy: A practical going-for-the-one clinical scoring system to personalize decision making. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12(8): 675-687 [PMID: 34513601 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i8.675]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Raquel Ciérvide, MD, Attending Doctor, Staff Physician, Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Oña, 10, Madrid 28050, Spain. raquel.ciervide@gmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Oncol. Aug 24, 2021; 12(8): 675-687 Published online Aug 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i8.675
Table 1 Characteristics of the 95 patients with sentinel lymph nodes with macrometastases
Characteristics
n = 95
%
Age (range), yr
51.9 (23-82)
-
Average tumor size, mm
17.4
-
Tumor size
0-10
14
14.7
11-15
25
26.3
16-20
26
27.4
21-30
18
18.9
31-40
6
6.3
> 50
1
1.1
In situ
5
5.3
Menopausal status
Pre
50
52.6
Post
45
47.4
Histology type
Ductal
76
80
Lobular
15
15.8
Others
4
4.2
Phenotype
Luminal
83
87.4
Basal
9
9.5
Her-2
3
3.2
Grade
I
16
16.8
II
54
56.8
I + II
70
73.7
III
24
25.3
Unknown
1
1.1
Surgery
Conservative
63
66.3
Mastectomy
32
33.7
Number of SN removed
1
35
36.8
2
28
29.5
3
20
21.1
≥ 4
12
12.6
Nº of positive SN (Mic + MAC)
0
4
4.2
1
65
68.4
2
20
21.1
3
4
4.2
≥ 4
2
2.1
Size of the SLN metastasis
ITC (i+)
0
0
Micrometastasis (Mic)
0
0
Macrometastasis (MAC)
95
100
Number of positive SLN
0
55
57.9
1
21
22.1
2-3
11
11.6
1-3
32
33.7
≥ 4
8
8.4
Adjuvant treatments
Radiotherapy
75/90
82.4
Chemotherapy
72/90
80
Hormonotherapy
79/90
87.7
Immunotherapy
4/92
4.3
Table 2 Univariate analysis of 95 patients with presence of sentinel lymph nodes with macrometastases
No additional metastatic lymph nodes
Additional metastatic lymph nodes
P value
Age
< 40
66%
44%
0.04
≥ 40
32.6%
67.4%
Hormonal status
Premenopausal
70%
30%
NS
Postmenopausal
60%
40%
T stage
T1
75.8%
24.2%
< 0.05
T2
47%
53%
T3
0
100%
Tumor size
≤ 15 mm
85%
15%
< 0.05
> 15 mm
49%
51%
Histologic type
Ductal carcinoma
67.1%
32.9%
NS
Lobular carcinoma
47%
53%
Grade
I + II
68.6%
31.4%
NS
III
54%
46%
Molecular subtype
Luminal A/B
65.6%
34.4%
< 0.05
Basal
22.2%
77.8%
HER2
100%
0
LVI
Present
66.7%
33.3%
NS
Absent
61.5%
38.5%
Number of positive SLN
1
69.6%
31.4%
< 0.05
≥ 2
43.7%
66.3%
ACOSOG Z0011 criteria
≤ 2 SLN+
68.5%
31.5%
< 0.05
> 2 SLN+
16%
84%
Table 3 Multivariate analysis of 95 patients with sentinel lymph nodes with macrometastases
P value
Odds ratio
Tumor size
≤ 15 mm vs > 15 mm
0.002
2.004
Number of metastatic SLN
1 vs > 1
0.021
2.573
ACOSOG Z0011 criteria
≤ 2 SLN+ vs > 2 SLN+
0.045
10.195
Table 4 Univariate analysis of variables related to the presence of additional disease on completion axillary lymph node dissection in the group of 79 cases with presence of only one macrometastatic sentinel lymph nodes
Additional metastatic lymph nodes, n = 79
Age
< 40
50%
≥ 40
28%
≤ 15 mm
85%
> 15 mm
49%
Histologic type
Ductal carcinoma
28%
Lobular carcinoma
50%
Mucinous
0
Tumor size
≤ 10 mm
7%
11-15 mm
10%
16-20 mm
42%
> 20 mm
47%
Grade
DCIS
0
I
18%
II
31%
III
45%
Molecular subtype
Luminal A/B
28%
Basal
55%
HER2
0
Citation: Herrero M, Ciérvide R, Calle-Purón ME, Valero J, Buelga P, Rodriguez-Bertos I, Benassi L, Montero A. Macrometastasis at selective lymph node biopsy: A practical going-for-the-one clinical scoring system to personalize decision making. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12(8): 675-687