Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Oncol. Mar 24, 2020; 11(3): 143-151
Published online Mar 24, 2020. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i3.143
Table 1 Patient and disease characteristics
CharacteristicsPertuzumab usage
Total (n = 304)P value
Yes (n = 50)No (n = 254)
Age at MBC diagnosis0.0133
Mean ± SD54.5 ± 11.6458.9 ± 11.5358.1 ± 11.65
Range32–7923–9523–95
Race, n (%)0.0003
Chinese29 (58.0)167 (65.7)196 (64.5)
Malay4 (8.00)57 (22.4)61 (9.21)
Indian5 (10.0)14 (5.51)19 (6.25)
Others12 (24.0)16 (6.30)28 (20.1)
Hormone receptor status, n (%)
ER positive32 (64.0)125 (49.2)157 (51.6)0.0638
PR positive18 (36.0)82 (32.2)102 (33.6)0.3264
Grade, n (%)0.8160
Grade 10 (0.00)3 (1.83)3 (1.515)
Grade 28 (23.53)47 (28.7)55 (27.8)
Grade 326 (76.5)114 (69.5)140 (70.7)
Histology, n (%)0.0899
Invasive ductal carcinoma48 (96.0)220 (86.6)268 (88.2)
Others2 (4.00)34 (13.4)36 (11.8)
Site of metastases, n (%)
Brain6 (12.0)17 (6.69)23 (7.57)0.2369
Lung18 (36.0)115 (45.3)133 (43.8)0.2754
Liver22 (44.098 (38.6)120 (39.5)0.5276
Bone30 (60.0)137 (53.9)167 (54.9)0.4425
Other16 (32.0)94 (37.0)110 (36.2)0.5249
Follow-up duration (yr)0.8511
Median (IQR)20.6 (21.6)22.5 (29.5)21.5 (27.8)
Range1–740–920–92
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate COX regression
CharacteristicsUnivariate analysis
Multivariable analysis
HR95%CIP valueHR95%CIP value
Age1.0100.997 – 1.0230.1330
Pertuzumab use0.5150.303 – 0.8770.01450.4680.271 – 0.8090.0066
Positive ER status0.7220.531 – 0.9810.03740.8750.601 – 1.2740.4871
Positive PR status0.7440.534 – 1.0370.08060.7700.511 – 1.1610.2136
Presence of metastases
Brain2.9531.844 – 4.730< 0.00013.6202.229 – 5.879< 0.0001
Lung1.3931.023 – 1.8970.03521.5201.107 – 2.0860.0097
Liver1.9001.395 – 2.590< 0.00012.0511.495 – 2.815< 0.0001
Bone1.3210.966 – 1.8040.0808
Other sites1.2310.895 – 1.6930.2007
Grade (Reference: Grade 1)
Grade 23.6160.494 – 26.4630.2056
Grade 32.7990.388 – 20.2020.3075
Race (Reference: Chinese)
Indian1.1840.636 – 2.2040.5952
Malay1.3500.931 – 1.9570.1135
Others0.6200.313 – 1.2270.1701