Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Oncol. Jan 24, 2020; 11(1): 20-30
Published online Jan 24, 2020. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i1.20
Table 1 Clinicopathologic characteristics of primary tumors in patients who experienced an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence
OverallDCISInvasive
n371918
Age [years, mean (SD)]63.08 (14.52)65.74 (11.49)60.28 (17.05)
Race (%)
White27 (73.0)13 (68.4)14 (77.8)
African American7 (18.9)3 (15.8)4 (22.2)
Asian1 (2.7)1 (5.3)0 (0.0)
Declined2 (5.4)2 (10.5)0 (0.0)
ER Positive (%)26 (70.3)14 (73.7)12 (66.7)
PR Positive (%)24 (64.9)12 (63.2)12 (66.7)
ILC2 (5.4)2 (11.1)
IDC15 (40.5)15 (83.3)
Mixed invasive1 (2.7)1 (5.6)
Invasive only: DCIS present (%)
No3 (16.7)
Yes15 (83.3)
Invasive only: HER-2 Status (%)
Negative14 (77.8)
Positive3 (16.7)
Not performed1 (5.6)
Invasive only: Pathologic grade (%)
14 (22.2)
24 (22.2)
310 (55.6)
Invasive only: Ki 67 Status (%)
Low (< 10)8 (44.4)
High (≥ 10)8 (44.4)
Not performed2 (11.1)
Invasive only: LVI (%)
Not present12 (66.7)
Present5 (27.8)
Close1 (5.6)
DCIS only: Nuclear grade (%)
Grade 10 (0)
Grade 210 (52.6)
Grade 39 (47.3)
T - stage (%)
019 (51.4)19 (100.0)0 (0.0)
111 (29.7)0 (0.0)11 (61.1)
27 (18.9)0 (0.0)7 (38.9)
Positive margins (%)8 (21.6)6 (31.6)2 (11.1)
Chemotherapy (%)11 (29.7)0 (0.0)11 (61.1)
Hormone therapy (%)18 (48.6)7 (36.8)11 (61.1)
Tumor axis/quadrant (%)
3:001 (2.7)1 (5.3)0 (0.0)
6:001 (2.7)0 (0.0)1 (5.6)
9:001 (2.7)1 (5.3)0 (0.0)
Central2 (5.4)1 (5.3)1 (5.6)
LIQ1 (2.7)0 (0.0)1 (5.6)
LOQ3 (8.1)2 (10.5)1 (5.6)
UIQ6 (16.2)2 (10.5)4 (22.2)
UOQ22 (59.5)12 (63.2)10 (55.6)
Table 2 Clinicopathologic characteristics of recurrences
Median time to IBTR (years IQR)1.97 (1.03-3.5)
Invasive (%)18 (45.9)
DCIS (%)19 (51.4)
DCIS to invasive conversion (%)5 (26.3)
Invasive to DCIS conversion (%)5 (27.8)
In-situ component in invasive histology (%)10 (55.6)
Concordant with original receptor subtype (%)
Yes25/32 (78.1)
No7/32 (21.9)
Unknown5/37 (13.5)
ER concordance (%)
Same25 (75.8)
Change from + to -5 (15.2)
Change from - to +2 (6.1)
PR concordance (%)
Same22 (66.7)
Change from + to -8 (24.2)
Change from - to +2 (6.0)
HER-2 concordance (%)
Same16 (100)
Change from + to -0 (0)
Change from - to +0 (0)
Concordant with original location (%)
Yes23 (62.2)
No14 (37.8)
Salvage surgery (%)32 (86.5)
Bilateral mastectomy16 (43.2%)
Unilateral mastectomy9 (24.3)
Local excision6 (16.2%)
Salvage systemic therapy (%)
Chemotherapy only3 (8.1)
Hormone therapy only11 (29.7)
Both5 (13.5)
Re-irradiation of ipsilateral breast6 (16.2%)
Table 3 Results of univariate Cox model assessing the association of clinical variables with risk of the first ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence
Clinical variableHazard ratio (95%CI)P value
Patient age (continuous)1.004 (0.98-1.02)0.73
ER negative1-
ER positive0.53 (0.26-1.11)0.093
PR negative1-
PR positive0.75 (0.38-1.50)0.423
Tumor grade: Low1-
Tumor grade: Intermediate0.791 (0.25-2.5)0.689
Tumor grade: High1.624 (0.54-4.8)0.385
Margins negative1-
Margins positive0.793 (0.36-1.75)0.565
No chemotherapy1-
Chemotherapy up-front1.282 (0.63-2.6)0.499
No endocrine therapy up-front1-
Endocrine therapy up-front0.362 (0.18-0.73)0.004
Biomarker not concordant1-
Biomarker concordant1.04 (0.95-1.10)0.92
Location not concordant1-
Location concordant1.265 (0.63-2.53)0.506
Size < 1.5 cm1-
Size ≥ 1.5 cm0.442 (0.22-0.90)0.023
Invasive primary tumors
LVI none1-
LVI present0.617 (0.20-1.92)0.404
HER2 negative/equivocal1-
HER2 positive0.837 (0.28-2.55)0.754
Ki-67 (continuous)1.002 (0.99-1.02)0.745

  • Citation: Purswani JM, Shaikh F, Wu SP, Kim JC, Schnabel F, Huppert N, Perez CA, Gerber NK. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in early stage breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy: Concordance of biomarkers and tumor location from primary tumor to in-breast tumor recurrence. World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11(1): 20-30
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v11/i1/20.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v11.i1.20