Published online Oct 10, 2017. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i5.398
Peer-review started: March 23, 2017
First decision: May 5, 2017
Revised: July 6, 2017
Accepted: July 14, 2017
Article in press: July 17, 2017
Published online: October 10, 2017
Processing time: 198 Days and 1.6 Hours
To evaluate factors associated with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and outcomes of CDI in the myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) population.
After IRB approval, all MDS/AML patients hospitalized at the University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center between August 2011 and December 2013 were identified. Medical charts were reviewed for demographics, clinical information, development of CDI, complications of CDI, and mortality. Patients with CDI, defined as having a positive stool PCR done for clinical suspicion of CDI, were compared to those without CDI in order to identify predictors of disease. A t-test was used for comparison of continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests were used for categorical variables, as appropriate.
Two hundred and twenty-three patients (60.1% male, mean age 61.3 years, 13% MDS, 87% AML) had 594 unique hospitalizations during the study period. Thirty-four patients (15.2%) were diagnosed with CDI. Factors significantly associated with CDI included lower albumin at time of hospitalization (P < 0.0001), prior diagnosis of CDI (P < 0.0001), receipt of cytarabine-based chemotherapy (P = 0.015), total days of neutropenia (P = 0.014), and total days of hospitalization (P = 0.005). Gender (P = 0.10), age (P = 0.77), proton-pump inhibitor use (P = 0.73), receipt of antibiotics (P = 0.66), and receipt of DNA hypomethylating agent-based chemotherapy (P = 0.92) were not significantly associated with CDI.
CDI is common in the MDS/AML population. Factors significantly associated with CDI in this population include low albumin, prior CDI, use of cytarabine-based chemotherapy, and prolonged neutropenia. In this study, we have identified a subset of patients in which prophylaxis studies could be targeted.
Core tip: This study evaluates factors associated with the development and outcomes of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in patients with Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Our findings demonstrate a high incidence of CDI with 15.2% of patients diagnosed with CDI during the 28-mo study period. Risk factors associated with the development of CDI include low albumin, prior history of CDI, chemotherapy within 30 d of hospitalization, cytarabine-based chemotherapy within 30 d of hospitalization, and increased duration of neutropenia and hospitalization.
- Citation: Shah K, Curtin BF, Chu C, Hwang D, Flasar MH, von Rosenvinge E. Characteristics of Clostridium difficile infection in patients hospitalized with myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myelogenous leukemia. World J Clin Oncol 2017; 8(5): 398-404
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v8/i5/398.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v8.i5.398
Clostridium difficile is a gram-positive, spore-forming, anaerobic bacterium that is the major cause of nosocomial diarrhea in the developed world. Over the last two decades the rate, morbidity, mortality, and costs of C. difficile infection (CDI) have risen dramatically[1]. Data from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show that the discharge diagnosis rate of CDI doubled from the 1990’s into the 2000’s[2,3]. CDI rates have increased considerably since that time, with a current estimate of almost half a million cases and 29000 deaths per year occurring in the United States alone[1]. This increase has not only been observed in hospitalized, elderly, and immunocompromised patients, but also in younger adults without significant comorbidities[4]. Patients who develop CDI have significant increases to their length of hospitalization[5]. According to a recent systematic review, attributable mean CDI costs range from $8911 to $30049 for hospitalized patients[6]. The sheer burden of CDI necessitates a search for more effective means of preventing and combating this infection.
Current statistics indicate that approximately 53000 new cases of leukemia will be diagnosed in the United States this year, 20000 of which will be acute myeloid leukemia (AML)[7]. Patients receiving treatment for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or AML are at increased risk for developing CDI given their frequent neutropenic episodes, as well as exposure to antibiotics and chemotherapy[8]. Antineoplastic agents have antimicrobial properties, and numerous chemotherapeutic drugs have been associated with the development of CDI, including cisplatin, etoposide, bleomycin, paclitaxel, vinblastine, 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cytarabine-based regimens[8]. Several risk factors for CDI in leukemia patients have been recently identified, which include receipt of chemotherapy, age > 65 years, admission at a teaching hospital, increased length of stay, diagnosis of acute rather than chronic leukemia, sepsis, and neutropenia[9,10].
The aim of this study is to evaluate factors associated with CDI and outcomes of CDI in the MDS and AML population. Outcomes of interest include mortality and severe morbidity such as Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, need for surgical intervention, or recurrence of CDI.
The Institutional Review Board of the University of Maryland, Baltimore, approved this study and waived the requirement for informed consent (IRB# HP-00058296). All patients with a diagnosis of MDS or AML were identified through an electronic medical record database utilized by the University of Maryland Medical Center (UMMC). Inclusion criteria were: Age greater than or equal to 18 years, a diagnosis of MDS or AML, and hospitalization at the UMMC Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center between August 2011 and December 2013. Charts were reviewed for demographics, clinical information, development of CDI, complications of CDI, and mortality. The starting point of data collection was identified as August 2011, when UMMC began to utilize the illumigene®C. difficile DNA amplification assay (Meridian Bioscience, Inc.). The assay uses loop-mediated isothermal DNA amplification to detect the tcdA 5’ region present in all toxigenic C. difficile, and has a sensitivity and specificity of 95.2% and 95.3%, respectively[11]. Our facility currently does not implement a two-step detection method for CDI.
Demographics and clinical data were recorded per patient encounter and included: Documented diagnosis of MDS or AML, age at diagnosis, gender, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use during hospitalization or the within 30 d prior to hospitalization, any prior documented history of CDI, type of chemotherapy received during hospitalization or within 30 d prior to hospitalization, antibiotic use during hospitalization or within 30 d prior to hospitalization, total length of stay in days, albumin level at admission, duration of neutropenia during hospitalization, current episode of CDI as a recurrence, and documentation of death or referral to hospice. Data collected included factors previously associated with CDI and focused on investigating the primary aim of our study as described above. CDI was defined as a positive stool C. difficile test done in the setting of diarrhea, defined as the passage of 3 or more unformed stools in 24 or fewer consecutive hours[12]. Our laboratory policy does not permit C. difficile testing on formed stool, thus we are reasonably confident all patients had diarrhea. Recurrence of CDI was defined as CDI in the setting of a positive C. difficile stool assay as well as receipt of CDI treatment in the 8 wk prior to the current episode. Severity of CDI was determined based on the criteria set forth by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines[12]. Chemotherapeutic regimens were defined as cytarabine-based, DNA hypomethylating agent-based, or other regimens. Neutropenia was defined as an absolute neutrophil count of 500 cells/μL or less.
MDS and AML patients with CDI were compared to those patients that were not diagnosed with CDI in order to identify factors related to disease. A t-test was used for comparison of continuous variables and χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests were used for categorical variables, as appropriate (SAS, version 9.2). Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. As some patients were hospitalized multiple times, data analysis was performed on variables per hospital encounter. Total days of neutropenia as well as total days of hospitalization during the study period were analyzed per patient. A biomedical statistician performed the statistical review.
We identified 223 patients with MDS or AML that had 594 unique hospitalizations between August 2011 and December 2013. Sixty point one percent of the patients were male, the mean age was 61.3 years, 87% had AML, and 13% had MDS. Thirty-four of the patients (15.2%) were diagnosed with CDI during the study period. Of these, 44% were male, the mean age was 59.2 years, 91% had AML, 9% had MDS, and 35% were on a PPI at time of admission. Sixty point seven percent received cytarabine-based chemotherapy, and 32.3% received DNA hypomethylating agent-based chemotherapy. None of the patients with MDS who developed CDI received cytarabine-based chemotherapy. Eighty-five percent received antibiotics during hospitalization or within the 30 d prior to hospitalization. Twelve percent had recurrent CDI, eight required intensive care unit admission, and one underwent colectomy for CDI. According to the classification criteria set forth by the SHEA/IDSA guidelines, 85.2% had mild-moderate disease, 11.7% had severe disease, and 2.9% had severe-complicated disease[12]. Twenty-three point five percent of these patients died or were referred to hospice (Table 1).
Variable (per patient) | CDI (n = 34) |
Diagnosis | |
AML | 31 (91) |
MDS | 3 (9) |
Gender | |
Male | 15 (44.1) |
Female | 19 (55.9) |
PPI therapy1 | 22 (64.7) |
Prior history of CDI | 5 (14.8) |
Receipt of chemotherapy2 | 31 (91) |
Type of chemotherapy | |
Cytarabine-based chemotherapy | 21 (61.7) |
DNA hypomethylating agent-based chemotherapy | 11 (32.3) |
Death/referral to hospice | 8 (23.5) |
Severity of CDI3 | |
Mild-moderate | 29 (85.2) |
Severe | 4 (11.7) |
Severe-complicated | 1 (2.9) |
Total number of CDI episodes during hospitalization | |
1 | 31 (91) |
2 | 3 (9) |
Recurrence of CDI | 4 (11.7) |
ICU admission | 8 (23.5) |
Bowel perforation | 0 |
Need for surgical intervention | 1 (3) |
Several factors were significantly associated with CDI when analyzed by hospital encounter (Table 2), including a lower albumin at the time of hospitalization (mean 2.8 g/dL in the CDI group vs 3.5 g/dL in the non-CDI group, P < 0.0001), prior history of CDI (P < 0.0001), receipt of any chemotherapy in within 30 d of hospitalization (92.1% in the CDI group vs 78.8% in the non-CDI group, P = 0.048), and receipt of cytarabine-based chemotherapy within 30 d of hospitalization (63.4% in the CDI group vs 45.5% in the non-CDI group, P = 0.015).
Variable | No CDI (n = 556) | CDI (n = 38) | Significance (P value) | No CDI (n = 189) | CDI (n = 34) | Significance (P value) |
Per encounter analysis | ||||||
Age on admission, mean (95%CI) | 58.4 (57.0-59.8) | 59.2 (54.6-63.9) | 0.77 | |||
Albumin level (g/dL) on admission, mean (95%CI) | 3.5 (3.4-3.5) | 2.8 (2.6-3.1) | < 0.0001 | |||
AML (vs MDS) diagnosis | 506 (91.0) | 35 (92.1) | 0.82 | |||
Male gender | 338 (60.8) | 18 (47.4) | 0.1 | |||
Female gender | 218 (39.2) | 20 (52.63) | 0.1 | |||
Use of PPI therapy1 | 206 (37.0) | 13 (34.21) | 0.73 | |||
Prior history of CDI | 15 (2.7) | 10 (23.32) | < 0.0001 | |||
Antibiotic use | 465 (84) | 31 (83) | 0.66 | |||
Any chemotherapy2 | 438 (78.8) | 35 (92.1) | 0.048 | |||
Cytarabine-based chemotherapy2 | 253 (45.5) | 25 (65.79) | 0.015 | |||
DNA hypomethylating agent-based chemotherapy2 (n) | 165 (29.7) | 11 (29.0) | 0.92 | |||
Other chemotherapy2 | 25 (4.5) | 0 (0) | 0.18 | |||
Death or referral to hospice | 82 (14.8) | 8 (21.05) | 0.29 | |||
Per patient analysis | ||||||
Total days of neutropenia during study period | 13.7 (11.3-16.0) | 21.6 (14.5-28.7) | 0.014 | |||
Total days of hospitalization during study period | 22.7 (19.9-25.5) | 40.8 (28.9-52.7) | < 0.0001 |
As some factors did not lend themselves to a per-hospital encounter analysis, we performed a per patient analysis (Table 2) for total days of neutropenia during the study period (mean 21.6 d in the CDI group vs 13.7 d in the non-CDI group, P = 0.014), and total days of hospitalization during the study period (mean 40.8 d in the CDI group vs 22.7 d in the non-CDI group, P = 0.005).
Our findings demonstrate a high incidence of CDI in our MDS and AML population with 15.2% of patients diagnosed with CDI during the 28-mo study period. This is comparable to previous reports. In a retrospective study of AML patients receiving chemotherapy, the incidence of CDI was 18%[13]. In another similar study, the incidence was 12%[14]. Within this overall high-risk group, we identified several factors associated with CDI. Specifically, CDI is significantly associated with low albumin level at time of hospitalization, prior history of CDI, receipt of any chemotherapy within 30 d of hospitalization, receipt of cytarabine-based chemotherapy within 30 d of hospitalization, total length of neutropenia and total length of hospitalization.
Similar to previously published findings, we found a higher rate of CDI in women, though this result was not statistically significant (P = 0.10)[1]. While other studies have identified associations between age and PPI use and risk for CDI[13], age (P = 0.77) and PPI use (P = 0.73) were not associated with CDI in our population. In addition, use of DNA hypomethylating agent-based chemotherapy (P = 0.92) was not associated with CDI. No differences in mortality or referral to hospice rates during the study period were identified between CDI and non-CDI groups (P = 0.29). It is well established that the greater the antibiotic exposure, the greater the risk of CDI[12,13]. However, infections during a neutropenic state are associated with high mortality rates, and thus antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated in patients with high-risk neutropenia per American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines[15]. Fluoroquinolones are generally the agents of choice in these situations. The emergence of the NAP1/BI/027 hypervirulent strain is associated with an increased incidence of CDI over the past 15 years[16]. Fluoroquinolone resistance characterizes the NAP1/BI/027 strain[16], which may be one reason for increased risk of CDI in this population. In our study, 85% of patients received antibiotic therapy. Interestingly, antibiotic usage was not a significantly associated with CDI (P = 0.66). This likely reflects insufficient power to detect a difference given the high rate of antibiotic use in this population. Previous studies examining strategies to improve antibiotic prescribing practices of providers have shown mixed results in the reduction of CDI incidence[17]. However, reducing the duration and potency of antibiotics used, particularly after initial presentation of CDI, would be an interesting area of study for the MDS and AML population.
Consistent with our findings, low albumin levels have previously been established as a risk factor for the development of CDI[18]. A low albumin level may indicate poor baseline health status, malnutrition, or the presence of other comorbidities such as cirrhosis or nephrotic syndrome, all which may increase susceptibility to CDI[19,20]. Also, low albumin may be found in cases of diarrhea and loss of protein due to mucositis/enterocolitis in patients after chemotherapy for AML. A prior history of CDI was associated with CDI, as demonstrated in previous studies[21]. Prior history of CDI may predispose a patient to future episodes of CDI due to patient colonization, environmental contamination, or the presence of persistent risk factors.
The majority of patients in our study had a confirmed diagnosis of AML and received treatment with cytarabine-based chemotherapy. Based on our findings, any chemotherapy, and cytarabine-based therapy in particular, was associated with development of CDI. This may be related to neutropenia, as total days of neutropenia was also significantly increased in patients that developed CDI. Chemotherapeutics are also known to disrupt enteric bacterial populations and the resulting dysbiosis may predispose to CDI[8]. While there is a paucity of data on the effect of different chemotherapeutic regimens on the gastrointestinal microbiome, cytotoxic changes may create a favorable environment for the proliferation of C. difficile. Microbial data suggests that chemotherapeutics may select for colonization of C. difficile and Enterococcus faecium[22].
We evaluated several factors that did not prove to be significantly associated with CDI in our MDS and AML population, including age, gender, PPI use, use of DNA hypomethylating agent-based chemotherapy, and antibiotic use. In theory, PPI therapy may increase the risk of CDI by increasing the ability of C. difficile spores to survive in the lumen of the gastrointestinal tract. While there has been controversy regarding their significance, a meta-analysis demonstrated a significant association between PPI use and risk of developing CDI (OR = 1.74, 95%CI: 1.47-2.85)[23]. Within the same study there appears to be increased risk with concomitant use of antibiotics and PPIs, and increased risk of recurrence with PPI use[23]. Non-cytarabine based chemotherapy, which in the case of our study was primarily DNA-hypomethylating agents, was not associated with CDI. We hypothesize that cytarabine-based agents are generally more caustic and induce a greater period of neutropenia, thus providing a more favorable environment for CDI in comparison to less cytotoxic agents.
We believe that our findings will inform future CDI prophylaxis studies in the high-risk MDS and AML population. We have identified a subset of this population, namely those with low albumin, prior CDI, or receipt of cytarabine-based chemotherapy, who can be identified at time of hospital admission as being especially high-risk for CDI. Recently, metronidazole prophylaxis has been proposed as a possible strategy for CDI prevention, however data specifically looking at patients with malignancies has not been supportive of prophylactic antibiotic treatment to prevent CDI[24,25]. In addition, the anti-toxin monoclonal antibody bezlotoxumab was recently approved by the FDA, and a toxoid vaccine in phase III clinical study is likely to be available soon[26,27]. Studies of these agents for CDI prophylaxis in our high-risk patient population are warranted.
Our study is not without limitations. Our study is retrospective and took place in a single tertiary medical center. We included primarily AML patients with a high degree of medical complexity, and our findings may not be generalizable to other populations. Additionally, many of the patients had prolonged hospital stays or numerous admissions throughout the testing period, and our study design was ill-equipped to evaluate temporal relationships between chemotherapy and CDI onset. Another limitation is our inability to analyze the degree in which antibiotics predict development of CDI in this population. While antibiotic usage was not found to be associated with CDI in our study, the widespread use of antibiotics makes this difficult to assess. While antibiotic exposure is not necessary for the development of CDI, it is likely to contribute to our population’s overall CDI risk[10].
In conclusion, CDI is common in our MDS/AML population. Factors significantly associated with CDI include low albumin, prior history of CDI, use of cytarabine-based chemotherapy, and prolonged neutropenia. Length of hospitalization is also associated with CDI; however, this is likely both a cause and effect of CDI. Prophylactic strategies to lower the burden of CDI in MDS/AML patients are needed. In this study, we have identified a subset of this high-risk population in which prophylaxis studies could be targeted. These findings are novel and increase our understanding of CDI in this patient population as well as open new frontiers of research.
Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) are blood borne malignancies that require strong treatments with heavy doses of chemotherapy, which leaves these patient’s susceptible to opportunistic infections. Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) remains a major cause of nosocomial diarrhea and is of significant importance to the immunosuppressed population, such as those receiving chemotherapies for AML and MDS.
CDI has been recognized as a major contributor of increased morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. New treatment regimens, such as vaccinations, immunotherapy, and fecal transplantation are currently undergoing evaluation. It is essential to identify certain susceptible populations in which targeted therapy for CDI can be investigated. Patients with AML and MDS are particularly susceptible to CDI and further characterization of CDI in this population is warranted.
The authors have found that CDI is common in this specific patient populations. Factors significantly associated with CDI in this population include low albumin, prior CDI, use of cytarabine-based chemotherapy, and prolonged neutropenia. The authors have identified a subset of patients in which prophylaxis studies could be targeted
By identifying and characterizing CDI within this specific patient population, the authors have identified a cohort of patients that would benefit from future novel CDI therapies and possible CDI prophylaxis. The authors have also identified risk factors that would enable providers to recognize patients that are particularly susceptible for identifying CDI and adjusting their management accordingly.
CDI was defined as a positive stool C. difficile test done in the setting of diarrhea, defined as the passage of 3 or more unformed stools in 24 or fewer consecutive hours. Recurrence of CDI was defined as CDI in the setting of a positive C. difficile stool assay as well as receipt of CDI treatment in the 8 wk prior to the current episode. Severity of CDI was determined based on the criteria set forth by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines. Chemotherapeutic regimens were defined as cytarabine-based, DNA hypomethylating agent-based, or other regimens. Neutropenia was defined as an absolute neutrophil count of 500 cells/μL or less.
The authors have shown that CDI is common in the MDS/AML population. Factors significantly associated with CDI in this population include low albumin, prior CDI, use of cytarabine-based chemotherapy, and prolonged neutropenia. The findings are worthy of sharing with the scientific community.
Manuscript source: Unsolicited manuscript
Specialty type: Oncology
Country of origin: United States
Peer-review report classification
Grade A (Excellent): A
Grade B (Very good): B
Grade C (Good): 0
Grade D (Fair): 0
Grade E (Poor): 0
P- Reviewer: Krishnan T, Moschovi MA S- Editor: Qi Y L- Editor: A E- Editor: Lu YJ
1. | Lessa FC, Mu Y, Bamberg WM, Beldavs ZG, Dumyati GK, Dunn JR, Farley MM, Holzbauer SM, Meek JI, Phipps EC. Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:825-834. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 2023] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1902] [Article Influence: 211.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
2. | Kwon JH, Olsen MA, Dubberke ER. The morbidity, mortality, and costs associated with Clostridium difficile infection. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015;29:123-134. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 129] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 137] [Article Influence: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Redelings MD, Sorvillo F, Mascola L. Increase in Clostridium difficile-related mortality rates, United States, 1999-2004. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:1417-1419. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 352] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 348] [Article Influence: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Khanna S, Pardi DS, Aronson SL, Kammer PP, Orenstein R, St Sauver JL, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR. The epidemiology of community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:89-95. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 441] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 466] [Article Influence: 38.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | Ghantoji SS, Sail K, Lairson DR, DuPont HL, Garey KW. Economic healthcare costs of Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect. 2010;74:309-318. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 216] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 227] [Article Influence: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Nanwa N, Kendzerska T, Krahn M, Kwong JC, Daneman N, Witteman W, Mittmann N, Cadarette SM, Rosella L, Sander B. The economic impact of Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:511-519. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 75] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 72] [Article Influence: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2015. Atlanta: American Cancer Society 2015; Available from: http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@editorial/documents/document/acspc-044552.pdf. [Cited in This Article: ] |
8. | Raza S, Baig MA, Russell H, Gourdet Y, Berger BJ. Clostridium difficile infection following chemotherapy. Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov. 2010;5:1-9. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 29] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30] [Article Influence: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Luo R, Greenberg A, Stone CD. Outcomes of Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized leukemia patients: a nationwide analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015;36:794-801. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 36] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40] [Article Influence: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
10. | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Severe Clostridium difficile-associated disease in populations previously at low risk--four states, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54:1201-1205. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
11. | illumigene® C. difficile DNA amplification assay package insert. Meridian Bioscience. [accessed 2016 Aug 20 ]. Available from: http://www.meridianbioscience.com/. [Cited in This Article: ] |
12. | Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Kelly CP, Loo VG, McDonald LC, Pepin J, Wilcox MH; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:431-455. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 2285] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2186] [Article Influence: 242.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Schalk E, Bohr UR, König B, Scheinpflug K, Mohren M. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea, a frequent complication in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. Ann Hematol. 2010;89:9-14. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 53] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 55] [Article Influence: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
14. | Gorschlüter M, Glasmacher A, Hahn C, Schakowski F, Ziske C, Molitor E, Marklein G, Sauerbruch T, Schmidt-Wolf IG. Clostridium difficile infection in patients with neutropenia. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:786-791. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 119] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 123] [Article Influence: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
15. | Gafter-Gvili A, Fraser A, Paul M, Vidal L, Lawrie TA, van de Wetering MD, Kremer LC, Leibovici L. Antibiotic prophylaxis for bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients following chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;1:CD004386. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 75] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 117] [Article Influence: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
16. | McDonald LC, Killgore GE, Thompson A, Owens RC Jr, Kazakova SV, Sambol SP, Johnson S, Gerding DN. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2433-2441. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
17. | Davey P, Marwick CA, Scott CL, Charani E, McNeil K, Brown E, Gould IM, Ramsay CR, Michie S. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:CD003543. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 217] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 358] [Article Influence: 32.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
18. | Bloomfield MG, Sherwin JC, Gkrania-Klotsas E. Risk factors for mortality in Clostridium difficile infection in the general hospital population: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect. 2012;82:1-12. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 53] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53] [Article Influence: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
19. | Di Bella S, Friedrich AW, García-Almodóvar E, Gallone MS, Taglietti F, Topino S, Galati V, Johnson E, D’Arezzo S, Petrosillo N. Clostridium difficile infection among hospitalized HIV-infected individuals: epidemiology and risk factors: results from a case-control study (2002-2013). BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:194. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
20. | Al-Tureihi FI, Hassoun A, Wolf-Klein G, Isenberg H. Albumin, length of stay, and proton pump inhibitors: key factors in Clostridium difficile-associated disease in nursing home patients. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2005;6:105-108. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 92] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 75] [Article Influence: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
21. | Tabak YP, Johannes RS, Sun X, Nunez CM, McDonald LC. Predicting the risk for hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection (HO-CDI) at the time of inpatient admission: HO-CDI risk score. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015;36:695-701. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 31] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32] [Article Influence: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
22. | Zwielehner J, Lassl C, Hippe B, Pointner A, Switzeny OJ, Remely M, Kitzweger E, Ruckser R, Haslberger AG. Changes in human fecal microbiota due to chemotherapy analyzed by TaqMan-PCR, 454 sequencing and PCR-DGGE fingerprinting. PLoS One. 2011;6:e28654. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 134] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 151] [Article Influence: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
23. | Kwok CS, Arthur AK, Anibueze CI, Singh S, Cavallazzi R, Loke YK. Risk of Clostridium difficile infection with acid suppressing drugs and antibiotics: meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1011-1019. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
24. | Rodriguez S, Hernandez MB, Tarchini G, Zaleski M, Vatanchi M, Cardona L, Castro-Pavia F, Schneider A. Risk of Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized patients receiving metronidazole for a non-C difficile infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:1856-1861. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 20] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
25. | Vehreschild MJ, Vehreschild JJ, Hübel K, Hentrich M, Schmidt-Hieber M, Christopeit M, Maschmeyer G, Schalk E, Cornely OA, Neumann S; German Society of Hematology and Oncology. Diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal complications in adult cancer patients: evidence-based guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO). Ann Oncol. 2013;24:1189-1202. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
26. | Lowy I, Molrine DC, Leav BA, Blair BM, Baxter R, Gerding DN, Nichol G, Thomas WD Jr, Leney M, Sloan S, Hay CA, Ambrosino DM. Treatment with monoclonal antibodies against Clostridium difficile toxins. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:197-205. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 585] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 558] [Article Influence: 39.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
27. | Sougioultzis S, Kyne L, Drudy D, Keates S, Maroo S, Pothoulakis C, Giannasca PJ, Lee CK, Warny M, Monath TP. Clostridium difficile toxoid vaccine in recurrent C. difficile-associated diarrhea. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:764-770. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |