Published online Dec 24, 2022. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i12.980
Peer-review started: August 18, 2022
First decision: September 5, 2022
Revised: September 16, 2022
Accepted: November 21, 2022
Article in press: November 21, 2022
Published online: December 24, 2022
Processing time: 117 Days and 17.5 Hours
The evaluation of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly integrated into the management of diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal cancer as it represents an innovative and minimally invasive biomarker that could allow us to reach clinical needs not met yet in randomized clinical trials. Recent research provided an interesting overview of the role of circulating tumor DNA in gastric, biliary, liver, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer. Data regarding upper gastro
Core Tip: Circulating tumor DNA is a promising tool in the era of precision medicine, with several potential applications in the entire management of gastrointestinal malignancies. Further evidence is needed to assess in which setting liquid biopsy might have a greater impact in clinical practice.
- Citation: Pretta A, Lai E, Donisi C, Spanu D, Ziranu P, Pusceddu V, Puzzoni M, Massa E, Scartozzi M. Circulating tumour DNA in gastrointestinal cancer in clinical practice: Just a dream or maybe not? World J Clin Oncol 2022; 13(12): 980-983
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v13/i12/980.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v13.i12.980
We read with great interest the minireview by Kirchweger et al[1], entitled “Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies”. This paper provides a comprehensive overview on available literature data regarding the potential role of ctDNA in the management of gastric, biliary tract, liver, pancreatic and colorectal cancer (CRC). The authors discuss the application of ctDNA detection from diagnosis to prognosis and treatment monitoring of each disease analysed, by critically presenting to the readers the advantages and limitations of this tool.
We strongly agree with authors that ctDNA represents an innovative, minimally invasive biomarker that might allow us to reach unmet clinical needs in clinical practice for gastrointestinal cancer patients if further validated in randomised clinical trials. Indeed, considering the dynamic nature of tumor biology and the genetic heterogeneity of diseases such as CRC, the serial assessments of biomarkers of interest through liquid biopsy might reflect the continuous changes of tumour itself and be useful to clinicians[2].
Notably, not a large amount of data is available about the application of ctDNA for diagnosis, as well as about its role in gastric and liver cancer. We greatly appreciate the authors’ effort to analyse these particular aspects and cancer types which are not the main field of research for this topic.
Indeed, main evidences regard prognosis and treatment monitoring, both in early stages (detection of minimal residual disease) and in advanced stages. Moreover, the majority of evidences derive from CRC studies.
Recently, Bregni et al[3] showed that baseline ctDNA was an independent prognostic factor for disease free survival (HR 3.35, 95%CI: 1.15-9.77, P = 0.03) in stage III CRC patients treated with neoadjuvant conventional 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and folinic acid (FOLFOX) followed by surgery +/- adjuvant FOLFOX in the PePiTA trial[4]. These findings derive from a small sample size (80 patients) but represent a starting point needing to be confirmed in larger trials focusing on early-stage CRC.
Surely, as highlighted by the authors, ctDNA has been extensively studied for tailoring treatment with anti-EGFR in further lines for RAS wild type metastatic CRC[5]. Our group recently explored the liquid biopsy-driven cetuximab rechallenge in a RAS and BRAF wild type selected population[6]. This strategy was confirmed to be effective and despite the small sample size, clinical outcome was consistent with the findings of phase II studies. Moreover, we observed that in addition to the molecular selection through ctDNA analysis for RAS-BRAF, long anti-EGFR free interval was a prospective selection criterion for this therapeutic option. Thus, the combination of ctDNA analysis plus clinical elements might be a winning strategy overcoming the limitations of a single tool.
As for pancreatic cancer, the identification of prognostic and predictive biomarkers is an urgent medical need. Unfortunately, despite extensive research no robust validated factors to guide treatment choice are available, except for BRCA status, and no effective agents have drastically improved the management of this disease, including immunotherapy[7-10]. For this reason, we strongly agree with the authors that ctDNA detection appears as an appealing instrument to guide therapeutic choices across different treatment lines, in order to improve clinical outcomes pancreatic cancer patients. Indeed, liquid biopsy has shown to be more sensitive than carbohydrate antigen199 levels in predicting prognosis and treatment response[11].
Moreover, ctDNA evaluation has been shown to be more sensitive than current gold standard radiological methods (computed tomography) in the evaluation of the tumor burden at staging (for any micro dissemination or lymph node involvement) and for relapses detection[12-13].
At the present time, data regard small groups of patients and require validation in larger trials.
In conclusion, ctDNA qualifies as a promising main actor in the precision medicine era, with potential applications in the whole management of gastrointestinal cancer patients. Further larger and prospective studies are needed to assess the real impact of liquid biopsy in clinical practice, but for now, potential benefits are likely to overcome its limitations.
Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.
Peer-review model: Single blind
Specialty type: Oncology
Country/Territory of origin: Italy
Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification
Grade A (Excellent): 0
Grade B (Very good): B
Grade C (Good): C
Grade D (Fair): 0
Grade E (Poor): 0
P-Reviewer: Kirchweger P, Austria; Liu S, China S-Editor: Liu GL L-Editor: A P-Editor: Liu GL
1. | Kirchweger P, Wundsam HV, Rumpold H. Circulating tumor DNA for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies. World J Clin Oncol. 2022;13:473-484. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in CrossRef: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Puzzoni M, Ziranu P, Demurtas L, Lai E, Mariani S, Liscia N, Soro P, Pretta A, Impera V, Camera S, Musio F, Persano M, Donisi C, Tolu S, Balconi F, Scartozzi M. Why precision medicine should be applied across the continuum of care for metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Future Oncol. 2020;16:4337-4339. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Bregni G, Pretta A, Senti C, Acedo Reina E, Vandeputte C, Trevisi E, Gkolfakis P, Kehagias P, Deleporte A, Van Laethem JL, Vergauwe P, Van den Eynde M, Deboever G, Janssens J, Demolin G, Holbrechts S, Clausse M, De Grez T, Peeters M, D'Hondt L, Geboes K, Besse-Hammer T, Rothé F, Flamen P, Hendlisz A, Sclafani F. Circulating DNA in the neoadjuvant setting of early stage colon cancer. Acta Oncol. 2022;1-7. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Hendlisz A, Golfinopoulos V, Deleporte A, Paesmans M, Mansy HE, Garcia C, Peeters M, Annemans L, Vandeputte C, Maetens M, Borbath I, Dresse D, Houbiers G, Fried M, Awada A, Piccart M, Laethem JL, Flamen P. Preoperative chemosensitivity testing as Predictor of Treatment benefit in Adjuvant stage III colon cancer (PePiTA): protocol of a prospective BGDO (Belgian Group for Digestive Oncology) multicentric study. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:190. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | Lai E, Liscia N, Donisi C, Mariani S, Tolu S, Pretta A, Persano M, Pinna G, Balconi F, Pireddu A, Impera V, Dubois M, Migliari M, Spanu D, Saba G, Camera S, Musio F, Ziranu P, Puzzoni M, Demurtas L, Pusceddu V, Dettori M, Massa E, Atzori F, Dessì M, Astara G, Madeddu C, Scartozzi M. Molecular-Biology-Driven Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 25] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24] [Article Influence: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Mariani S, Puzzoni M, Giampieri R, Ziranu P, Pusceddu V, Donisi C, Persano M, Pinna G, Cimbro E, Parrino A, Spanu D, Pretta A, Lai E, Liscia N, Lupi A, Giglio E, Palomba G, Casula M, Pisano M, Palmieri G, Scartozzi M. Liquid Biopsy-Driven Cetuximab Rechallenge Strategy in Molecularly Selected Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients. Front Oncol. 2022;12:852583. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Lai E, Puzzoni M, Ziranu P, Pretta A, Impera V, Mariani S, Liscia N, Soro P, Musio F, Persano M, Donisi C, Tolu S, Balconi F, Pireddu A, Demurtas L, Pusceddu V, Camera S, Sclafani F, Scartozzi M. New therapeutic targets in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019;81:101926. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 47] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67] [Article Influence: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
8. | Pretta A, Lai E, Persano M, Donisi C, Pinna G, Cimbro E, Parrino A, Spanu D, Mariani S, Liscia N, Dubois M, Migliari M, Impera V, Saba G, Pusceddu V, Puzzoni M, Ziranu P, Scartozzi M. Uncovering key targets of success for immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2021;25:987-1005. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Golan T, Hammel P, Reni M, Van Cutsem E, Macarulla T, Hall MJ, Park JO, Hochhauser D, Arnold D, Oh DY, Reinacher-Schick A, Tortora G, Algül H, O'Reilly EM, McGuinness D, Cui KY, Schlienger K, Locker GY, Kindler HL. Maintenance Olaparib for Germline BRCA-Mutated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:317-327. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1137] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1452] [Article Influence: 290.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
10. | Lai E, Ziranu P, Spanu D, Dubois M, Pretta A, Tolu S, Camera S, Liscia N, Mariani S, Persano M, Migliari M, Donisi C, Demurtas L, Pusceddu V, Puzzoni M, Scartozzi M. BRCA-mutant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2021;125:1321-1332. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
11. | Kruger S, Heinemann V, Ross C, Diehl F, Nagel D, Ormanns S, Liebmann S, Prinz-Bravin I, Westphalen CB, Haas M, Jung A, Kirchner T, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Boeck S, Holdenrieder S. Repeated mutKRAS ctDNA measurements represent a novel and promising tool for early response prediction and therapy monitoring in advanced pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:2348-2355. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 75] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 80] [Article Influence: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Kirchweger P, Kupferthaler A, Burghofer J, Webersinke G, Jukic E, Schwendinger S, Weitzendorfer M, Petzer A, Függer R, Rumpold H, Wundsam H. Circulating tumor DNA correlates with tumor burden and predicts outcome in pancreatic cancer irrespective of tumor stage. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022;48:1046-1053. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Kirchweger P, Kupferthaler A, Burghofer J, Webersinke G, Jukic E, Schwendinger S, Wundsam H, Biebl M, Petzer A, Rumpold H. Prediction of response to systemic treatment by kinetics of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic pancreatic cancer. Front Oncol. 2022;12:902177. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |