Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Aug 6, 2014; 5(3): 113-121
Published online Aug 6, 2014. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v5.i3.113
Published online Aug 6, 2014. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v5.i3.113
Study | Dose MTX | Route ofadmin | n | Study design | Patients | Duration follow up (wk) | MTX response | MTX remission | Placebo or (Comparator) Response | AE MTX | AE Placebo | |
Kozarek | 25 mg/wk | sq | 14 | Non-Randomized-open Label | CD | 12 | 79% | |||||
Feagan | 25 mg/wk | im | 141 | Double-blind Placebo controlled multi center | Steroid dependent CD | 16 | 39.4%1 | 19.1% | 1% | 2% | ||
Oren | 12.5 mg/wk | po | 84 | Randomized Double-Blind Placebo Controlled | Active CD | 36 | 38% | 46% | ||||
Arora | 22.5 mg/wk | po | 33 | Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled | Steroid Dependent CD | 52 | 54% | 20% | 23% | 0 | ||
Feagan | 15 mg/wk | im | 76 | Double Blind Placebo Controlled Multi-Center | CD Maintenance | 40 | 65%1 | 39% | 1% | 2% | ||
Mate- Jimenez | 15 mg/wk | po | 38 | Randomized Single Center | Steroid Dependent CD | 76 | 80%1 Induction 66.6%1 Maintenance | 14% Induction 0 Maintenance | 11.5% | 0 | ||
Lemann | 25 mg/wk | im | 49 | Retrospective | Active CD | 84% | 49% | |||||
Fraser | 20 mg/wk (10-25) | po/im | 48 | Retrospective | Active CD-Maintenance | 62% | 27% | |||||
Ardizzone | 25 mg/wk | iv | 54 | Investigator Blind, randomized | Active CD | 24 | 56% | 63% AZA | 11% | |||
Mahadevan | 25 mg/wk | im | 16 | Retrospective case series | Fistulizing CD | 56% | 6% | |||||
Wahed | 25 mg/wk Induction 15 mg/wk Maintenance | im/po-Induction po-Maintenance | 99 | Retrospective | AZA Intolerance/ AZA non-responders | 62% | 8.3% | |||||
Feagan | Wk0-10 mg/wk Wk3-20 mg/wk Wk5-25 mg/wk | sq | 126 | Double Blind Placebo Controlled Multi-center | Active CD | 50 | IFX + MTX 56% | IFX + PCBO 57% |
Study | Dose (mean) | Route | No. of patients | Study design | Follow-up (wk) | MTX response | MTX remission | Placebo response |
Kozarek | 25 mg | im | 7 | Open label | 12 | 5/7 (71.40%) | N/A | |
Baron | 15 mg | Oral | 8 | Open label | 18 | 3/8 (37.5%) | 0 | N/A |
Oren | 12.5 mg | Oral | 67 | Placebo control | 36 | 14/30 (46.7%) | 18/37 (48.6%) | |
Egan | 15 mg 25 mg | scsc | 18 12 | Open label | 16 | 7/18 (39%) 4/12 (33%) | 3/18 (17%) 2/12 (17%) | N/A N/A |
Mate-Jimenez | 15 mg | Oral | 34 | 6-MP control | 30 | 7/12 (58.30%) | 11/14 (78.6%) | |
Paoluzi | 12.5 mg | im | 10 thiopurine resistant/intolerant | Open label | 26 | 10/10 (100%) | 6/10 (60%) | N/A |
Cummings | 19.9 mg mean | Oral | 11 AZA failure 31 AZA intolerant | Retrospective | 30 | 3/11 (27%) 18/31 (58%) | 14/31 | N/A |
Nathan | 20-25 mg | sc/ oral | 23 | Retrospective | N/A | 11/23 (48%) | N/A | |
Wahed | 10-25 mg | Oral, sc | 9 thiopurine ineffective 23 thiopurine intolerant | Retrospective | 26 | 7/9 (78%) 15/23 (65%) | N/A | N/A |
Manosa | 25 mg | Oral sc | 7 33 | Retrospective | 26 | 24/40 (60%) remission | N/A | |
Saibeni | 20 mg | Oral/ sc/im | 23 | Retrospective | N/A | 11/23 (47.8%) | N/A | |
Khan | 14 mg 25 mg | Oral sc/im | 68 23 | Retrospective | 60 | 25/68 (37%) 7/23 (30%) | N/A |
Study | Dose (mean) | Route | No. of pts | Study design | Follow-upperiod (mo) | MTX responsemaintained? | Controlresponse | Significantlyeffective? |
Kozarek | > 7.5 mg | sc | 5 | Open label | 24 | 3/5 (60%) | N/A | N/A |
Oren | 12.5 mg | oral | 32 | Placebo-controlled | 9 | 5/14 (36%) | 10/18 (56%) | No |
Mate-Jimenez | 15 mg | oral | 12 | 6-MP control | 18 | 1/7 (14%) | 7/11 (64%) | No |
Paoluzi | 12.5 mg | im | 10 | Open label | 24 | 6/8 (75%) | N/A | N/A |
Manosa | 25 mg | Oral/ | 7 | Retrospective | 24 | 35% | N/A | |
sc | 33 |
- Citation: Swaminath A, Taunk R, Lawlor G. Use of methotrexate in inflammatory bowel disease in 2014: A User’s Guide. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2014; 5(3): 113-121
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5349/full/v5/i3/113.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v5.i3.113