Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. May 6, 2014; 5(2): 97-104
Published online May 6, 2014. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v5.i2.97
Published online May 6, 2014. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v5.i2.97
Ref. | Type of stent | Type of EVS | Randomized | Prospective study | Consecutive patients | Comparable base-line data | Definition of variceal rebleeding | Definition of post-TIPS HE | Lost (TIPS/EVS) |
Mahadeva et al[13] | Bare | Cyanoacrylate | No | No | No | Yes | NR | NR | 0/0 |
Lo et al[19] | Bare | Cyanoacrylate | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Rebleeding from GV or EV was defined as the presence of hematemesis or melena with the bleeding source being endoscopically proven to originate from GV or EV, respectively | Patients with altered consciousness levels and elevated arterial ammonia levels requiring hospitalization were recorded as having the complication of hepatic encephalopathy | 1/6 |
Procaccini et al[7] | 29 with covered stent, 15 with bare stent | Cyanoacrylate | No | No | NR | Yes | Rebleeding was defined by a significant decrease in hemoglobin or hematocrit requiring packed red cell transfusion or evidence of hematemesis or melena with hemodynamic insufficiency | NR | NR/NR |
Ref. | Patients screened | Patients included Total/TIPS/EVS | Age TIPS/EVS | Gender TIPS/EVS male (female) | Child-Pugh classes TIPS/EVS | Etiology | GV anatomy TIPS/EVS | ||||||
A | B | C | Viral TIPS/EVS | Alcohol TIPS/EVS | Others TIPS/EVS | GOV1 | GOV2 | IGV | |||||
Mahadeva et al[13] | NR | 43/20/23 | 52/55 | 13 (7)/15 (8) | 4/4 | 6/8 | 10/9 | 0/0 | 12/14 | 8/9 | 13/15 | 7/8 | 0/0 |
Lo et al[19] | 460 | 72/35/37 | 55/52 | 25 (10)/28 (9) | 9/12 | 20/19 | 6/6 | 30/26 | 4/8 | 1/3 | 19/17 | 14/19 | 2/1 |
Procaccini et al[7] | NR | 105/44/61 | 52/54.5 | 26 (18)/43 (18) | NR | NR | NR | 14/16 | 17/24 | 13/21 | NR | NR | NR |
Ref. | Successful stent placement | Shunt stenosis | Finalpatency | EVS per patient mean ± SD | Patients crossing over to TIPS | Clinical failure TIPS/EVS | Variceal rebleeding TIPS/EVS | HE TIPS/EVS | Refractory HE TIPS/EVS | Death TIPS (%)/EVS (%) |
Mahadeva et al[13] | 18/20 (90) | 2/20 (10) | 16/20 (80) | 3 ± 1.5 | 2 (9) | 2 (10)/4 (17) | 4 (20)/8 (35) | 21 (10)/0 (0) | NR | 1 (5)/2 (9) |
Lo et al[19] | 35/35 (100) | 8/35 (23) | 27/35 (77) | 3.3 ± 1.4 | 1 (3) | 1 (3)/3 (8) | 7 (20)/19 (51) | 9 (26)/1 (3) | NR | 16 (46)/12 (32) |
Procaccini et al[7] | NR | 6/42 (14) | 36/42 (86) | 2 ± median | 7 (11) | NR | UA | 11 (25)/1 (2) | NR | 14 (32)/17 (28) |
-
Citation: Bai M, Qi XS, Yang ZP, Wu KC, Fan DM, Han GH. EVS
vs TIPS shunt for gastric variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis: A meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2014; 5(2): 97-104 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5349/full/v5/i2/97.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v5.i2.97