Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Aug 6, 2011; 2(4): 27-35
Published online Aug 6, 2011. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v2.i4.27
Published online Aug 6, 2011. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v2.i4.27
Table 1 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists recommendations for stress ulcer prophylaxis
Population | Treatment recommendations | Grade |
Non-critically ill medical and surgical patients | Prophylaxis not recommended | B1 |
Critically ill patients with one of the following: | ||
Coagulopathy (i.e. platelet count of < 50 000 mm3, INR of 1.5) | Prophylaxis recommended | C |
Mechanical ventilation for > 48 h | C | |
History of gastrointestinal ulceration or bleeding within 1 year of admission | D | |
Glasgow Coma score of ≤ 10 | B, D2 | |
Thermal injury to > 35% of body surface area | B, D3 | |
Partial hepatectomy | C, D4 | |
Multiple trauma (injury severity score of ≥ 16) | D | |
Hepatic or renal transplantation | D | |
Spinal cord injury | D | |
Hepatic failure | D | |
Two or more of the following risk factors: sepsis, ICU stay of greater than 1 wk, occult bleeding lasting at least 6 d, and high-dose corticosteroids (> 250 mg/d of hydrocortisone or equivalent daily) | D | |
Pediatric patients with one of the following: | ||
Respiratory failure | Prophylaxis recommended | C |
Coagulopathy | C | |
Pediatric Risk of Mortality Score of ≥ 10 | C | |
Thermal injuries | D |
Table 2 Dosage regimens for agents used for stress ulcer prophylaxis
Medication | Adult raNGe |
Cimetidine | 300 mg qid po, NG, or iv or 50 mg/h by continuous iv infusion |
Famotidine | 20 mg bid po, NG, or iv or 1.7 mg/h by continuous iv infusion |
Ranitidine | 150 mg bid po or NG, 50 mg every 6-8 h iv, or 6.25 mg/h by continuous iv infusion |
Nizatidine | 150 mg bid po or NG |
Antacids | 30-60 mL po or NG every 1-2 h |
Sucralfate | 1 g qid po or NG |
Omeprazole | 40 mg LD then 20-40 mg daily po, NG or iv |
Lansoprazole | 30 mg daily po, NG or iv |
Esomeprazole | 20-40 mg daily po, NG or iv |
Rabeprazole | 20 mg daily po or NG |
Pantoprazole | 40 mg daily po or NG or iv |
Table 3 General characteristics of the sample (n =1004)
Patients characteristics | n (%) |
Gender | |
Males | 527 (52.5) |
Females | 477 (47.5) |
Age (yr, mean ± SD) | 54.6 ± 21.2 |
Unit | |
ICU | 142 (14.1) |
IM | 468 (46.6) |
Surgery | 190 (18.9) |
CCU | 94 (9.4) |
Pediatrics | 40 (4.0) |
OBGYN | 28 (2.8) |
Others | 42 (4.2) |
Hospital stay: Median and IQR (d) | 4.0 (5.0)1 |
Acid-suppressant drugs | |
PPIs | 618 (61.6) |
Omeprazole | 477 (47.5) |
Lansoprazole | 50 (5.0) |
Esomeprazole | 5 (0.5) |
Rabeprazole | 86 (8.6) |
H2-RAs | 386 (38.4) |
Ranitidine | 384 (38.2) |
Nizatidine | 2 (0.20) |
Duplicate therapy | 0 (0) |
Table 4 Assessment of stress ulcer prophylaxis practice
SUP variable | n (%) |
Indication | |
Non-Candidates for SUP1 | 673 (67) |
Candidates for SUP2 | 331 (33) |
1 major risk factor3 | 53 (25.2) |
2 minor risk factors4 | 204 (20.3) |
7 d stay in ICU and 1 minor risk factor | 38 (3.8) |
Dose | |
Appropriate | 891 (88.9) |
Inappropriate | 111 (11.1) |
Route | |
Oral | 232 (23.2) |
Parenteral | 770 (76.8) |
Inappropriate5 | 551 (71.6) |
Duration (d) | |
Median (IQR) | 4.0 (5)6 |
Regimen (dose + route + duration) | |
Appropriate | 124 (12.4) |
Inappropriate | 880 (87.6) |
Table 5 Assessment of stress ulcer prophylaxis practice per indication n (%)
SUP variable | Candidates | Non-candidates | P-value |
Acid-suppressant drugs | |||
PPIs | 208 (62.8) | 410 (60.9) | |
H2-RAs | 123 (37.2) | 263 (39.1) | 0.557 |
Dose | |||
Appropriate | 281 (84.9) | 610 (90.0) | |
Inappropriate | 50 (15.1) | 61 (9.1) | 0.004 |
Route | |||
Appropriate | 150 (45.3) | 301 (44.7) | |
Inappropriate | 181 (54.7) | 372 (55.3) | 0.859 |
Dose and route | |||
Appropriate | 124 (37.5) | 265 (39.4) | |
Inappropriate | 207 (62.5) | 408 (60.6) | 0.558 |
Duration (d) | |||
Median (IQR) | 5.0 (7.0) | 3.0 (4.0) | < 0.0011 |
Discharge on SUP | |||
Yes | 49 (28.8) | 70 (20.9) | |
No | 121 (71.2) | 265 (79.1) | 0.047 |
Table 6 Assessment of stress ulcer prophylaxis practice per hospital type n (%)
SUP variable | Teaching | Non-teaching | P-value |
Indication | |||
Candidates | 153 (37.8) | 178 (29.7) | |
Non-candidates | 252 (62.2) | 421 (70.3) | 0.008 |
Dose | |||
Appropriate | 350 (86.4) | 541 (90.6) | |
Inappropriate | 55 (13.6) | 56 (9.4) | 0.038 |
Route | |||
Appropriate | 206 (50.9) | 245 (40.9) | |
Inappropriate | 199 (49.1) | 354 (59.1) | 0.002 |
Dose and route | |||
Appropriate | 178 (44.0) | 211 (35.2) | |
Inappropriate | 227 (56.0) | 388 (64.8) | 0.005 |
Acid-suppressant drugs | |||
PPIs | 266 (65.7) | 352 (58.8) | |
H2-RAs | 139 (34.3) | 247 (41.2) | 0.027 |
Duration (d) | |||
Median (IQR)1 | 5 (10) | 3 (3.75) | < 0.0011 |
Discharge on SUP | |||
Yes | 53 (26.2) | 66 (21.8) | |
No | 149 (73.8) | 237 (78.2) | 0.248 |
- Citation: Zeitoun A, Zeineddine M, Dimassi H. Stress ulcer prophylaxis guidelines: Are they being implemented in Lebanese health care centers? World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2011; 2(4): 27-35
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5349/full/v2/i4/27.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v2.i4.27