Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Jul 18, 2019; 10(3): 57-66
Published online Jul 18, 2019. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v10.i3.57
Published online Jul 18, 2019. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v10.i3.57
Table 1 Patient characteristics
Patient | Age | Sex | Weight in kg | Height in cm | BMI in kg/m2 | ASA class | Sleep apnea | Included |
1 | 70 | Male | 96.6 | 168 | 34.4 | III | Yes | Yes |
2 | 51 | Female | 79.4 | 165 | 29.1 | II | No | No |
3 | 61 | Female | 99.8 | 168 | 35.5 | II | Yes | No |
4 | 90 | Male | 72.6 | 163 | 27.5 | II | No | Yes |
5 | 51 | Male | 95.3 | 170 | 32.9 | III | No | Yes |
6 | 71 | Male | 145.2 | 191 | 40 | IV | Yes | Yes |
7 | 65 | Male | 108.0 | 180 | 33.2 | III | No | Yes |
8 | 51 | Female | 96.2 | 152 | 41.4 | III | Yes | No |
9 | 65 | Male | 115.7 | 175 | 37.7 | II | No | Yes |
10 | 47 | Male | 79.4 | 175 | 25.8 | I | No | Yes |
11 | 41 | Female | 64.0 | 157 | 25.8 | III | No | Yes |
12 | 77 | Female | 65.8 | 157 | 26.5 | III | No | No |
Table 2 Procedure data
Patient | Procedure | Date | RR | O2 Sat% | HR | BP inmmHg | Sedationused | Included |
1 | EGD | 6/13/16 | 20 | 97 | 87 | 145/78 | Conscious | Yes |
2 | Colonoscopy | 6/13/16 | 18 | 100 | 68 | 159/93 | Conscious | No |
3 | Colonoscopy | 6/13/16 | 19 | 97 | 87 | 139/73 | Conscious | No |
4 | Colonoscopy | 6/13/16 | 18 | 97 | 79 | 142/74 | Conscious | Yes |
5 | EGD | 6/14/16 | 18 | 98 | 76 | 133/80 | Conscious | Yes |
6 | Colonoscopy | 6/16/16 | 16 | 92 | 64 | 151/92 | MAC | Yes |
7 | EGD | 6/16/16 | 16 | 98 | 70 | 155/81 | MAC | Yes |
8 | EUS | 6/16/16 | 16 | 98 | 59 | 120/61 | MAC | No |
9 | Colonoscopy | 7/25/16 | 20 | 97 | 55 | 133/74 | Conscious | Yes |
10 | Colonoscopy | 7/25/16 | 16 | 99 | 64 | 117/67 | Conscious | Yes |
11 | Colonoscopy | 7/26/16 | 18 | 99 | 55 | 111/62 | MAC | Yes |
12 | EGD/ Colonoscopy | 7/26/16 | 16 | 98 | 77 | 177/107 | MAC | No |
Table 3 Comparison of measured respiratory rate between capnography and LRMD
Subject | Capnostream, mean ± SD | Linshom, mean ± SD | Capnostream–Linshom (95%CI) | Pearson’s Correlation1 (95%CI) |
1 | 14.9 ± 1.9 | 15.3 ± 2.1 | -0.46 (-0.50, -0.42) | 0.41 (0.40, 0.43) |
4 | 15.6 ± 2.6 | 15.8 ± 3.3 | -0.21 (-0.25, -0.17) | 0.62 (0.61, 0.63) |
5 | 25.1 ± 4.2 | 26.6 ± 2.9 | -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3) | 0.61 (0.60, 0.62) |
6 | 7.9 ± 5.8 | 8.4 ± 5.2 | -0.52 (-0.56, -0.48) | 0.72 (0.72, 0.73) |
7 | 23.1 ± 2.7 | 23.3 ± 4.4 | -0.21 (-0.28, -0.14) | 0.27 (0.25, 0.28) |
9 | 13.2 ± 3.3 | 12.9 ± 3.4 | 0.37 (0.35, 0.39) | 0.84 (0.84, 0.84) |
10 | 15.7 ± 3.0 | 15.0 ± 3.6 | 0.76 (0.74, 0.78) | 0.76 (0.75, 0.76) |
11 | 15.8 ± 1.5 | 15.5 ± 1.7 | 0.26 (0.24, 0.27) | 0.65 (0.64, 0.65) |
Table 4 Comparison of apnea events reported by Capnostream and Linshom devices
Subject | Capnostream | Linshom | Capnostream–Linshom (95%CI) |
1 | 0 | 0 | -- |
4 | 0 | 1.4 (1.4, 1.4) | -1.4 (-1.4, -1.4) |
5 | 0 | 0 | -- |
6 | 30.3 (29.9, 30.8) | 23.3 (23.0, 23.7) | 7.0 (6.7, 7.3) |
7 | 0 | 0.81 (0.81, 0.81) | -0.81 (-0.81, -0.81) |
9 | 4.8 (4.6, 5.0) | 5.1 (4.9, 5.3) | -0.30 (-0.40, -0.20)) |
10 | 0.83 (0.76, 0.91) | 1.8 (1.7, 1.9) | -0.93 (-1.03, -0.84) |
11 | 0 | 0 | -- |
- Citation: Wadhwa V, Gonzalez AJ, Selema K, Feldman R, Lopez R, Vargo JJ. Novel device for monitoring respiratory rate during endoscopy-A thermodynamic sensor. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2019; 10(3): 57-66
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5349/full/v10/i3/57.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v10.i3.57