Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. Dec 15, 2011; 2(6): 93-99
Published online Dec 15, 2011. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v2.i6.93
Published online Dec 15, 2011. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v2.i6.93
Table 1 Definition of intraepithelial neoplasia
Definition | ||
Japanese view | Western view | |
Indefinite for intraepithelial neoplasia | A temporary term | A temporary term |
It is difficult to distinguish whether a lesion is neoplastic or non-neoplastic, or reactive or regenerative | ||
LGIN | Characterized by a slightly modified mucosal architecture, including the presence of tubular structures with budding and branching, papillary enfolding, crypt lengthening with serration and cystic changes | |
HGIN | Characterized by an increasing architectural distortion with glandular crowding and prominent cellular atypia without stromal invasion | |
Adenocarcinoma/carcinoma | Diagnosed on nuclear and structural atypia, even when invasion is absent[45] | Diagnosed when evident invasive growth of neoplastic epithelium into the lamina propria of the mucosa or beyond is observed[46] |
Table 2 Histological discrepancy rates between biopsy and endoscopic resection sample n (%)
Reports (yr) | Endoscopic biopsy | Resected specimens | Overall | |
Underdiagnosis1 | Overdiagnosis2 | Discrepancy3 | ||
Yoon et al[47], 2006 | Tubular adenoma | 2/41 (4.9) | 2/41 (4.9) | 4/41 (9.8) |
Jung et al[29], 2008 | LGIN | 31/74 (42) | - | - |
HGIN | 36/40 (90) | 2/40 (5) | 38/40 (95) | |
Lee et al[48], 2010 | IN | 114/311 (37) | 41/311 (13) | 155/311 (50) |
Carcinoma | 7/86 (8.1) | 16/86 (19) | 23/86 (26) | |
Total | 121/397 (30) | 57/397 (14) | 178/397 (45) | |
Kato et al[27], 2010 | IN | 255/468 (44) | 4/468 (1.7) | 259/468 (46) |
Table 3 Histological follow-up studies of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia through mild to severe dysplasia
Reports (yr) | LGIN (including mild to moderate dysplasia) | HGIN (including severe dysplasia) | ||
Detection of carcinoma n (%) | Interval (mean) n (%) | Detection of carcinoma | Interval (mean) | |
Saraga et al[49], 1987 | 1/64 (2) | 4 yr | 17/21 (81) | 4 mo |
Lansdown et al[46], 1990 | 0/7 (0) | - | 11/13 (85) | 5 mo |
Rugge et al[50], 1991 | 12/69 (17) | 1 yr | 6/8 (75) | 4 mo |
Fertitta et al[51], 1993 | 7/30 (23) | 10 mo | 25/31 (81) | 5 mo |
Farinati et al[52], 1993 | - | - | 16/49 (33)1 | - |
Di Gregorio et al[53], 1993 | 6/89 (7) | 2 yr | 6/10 (60) | 11 mo |
Bearzi et al[54], 1994 | 8/81 (9.9) | - | 27/44 (61) | - |
Rugge et al[55], 1994 | 13/90 (14) | 2 yr | 14/18 (78) | 9 mo |
Kolodziejczyk et al[56], 1994 | 2/351 (5.72) | - | 7/7 (100) | - |
Kokkola et al[57], 1996 | 0/9 (0) | - | 2/3 (67) | 1.5 yr |
Rugge et al[19], 2003 | 8/90 (8.9) | 4 yr | 11/16 (69) | 34 mo |
Yamada et al[58], 2004 | 0/38 (0) | - | 1/10 (10) | 54 mo |
Park et al[59], 2008 | 3/26 (12) | 58 mo3 | 1/1 (100) | 58 mo3 |
Overall | 60/628 (9.5) | 145/231 (63) |
Table 4 Endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer[60]
EMR | ESD | |
Merits | Minimally invasive technique which is safe, convenient and efficacious | The advantage of achieving large en-bloc resections, not necessarily limited by lesion size |
Demerits | Insufficient when treating larger lesions, especially larger that 15 mm | Requiring significant additional technical skills and a longer procedure time |
Prolonged learning curve | ||
High risks of local recurrence, especially when resections are not performed en bloc or when the resection margins are involved by tumor | A higher complication rate compared to standard EMR |
- Citation: Nishida T, Tsutsui S, Kato M, Inoue T, Yamamoto S, Hayashi Y, Akasaka T, Yamada T, Shinzaki S, Iijima H, Tsujii M, Takehara T. Treatment strategy for gastric non-invasive intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2011; 2(6): 93-99
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5330/full/v2/i6/93.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.v2.i6.93