Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. May 22, 2022; 13(3): 59-72
Published online May 22, 2022. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v13.i3.59
Table 1 Comparison of the two main bariatric surgery procedures

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Vertical sleeve gastrectomy
Technique(1) 15-30 mL gastric pouch; (2) Gastrojejunostomy (GJ); (3) Jejunojejunal anastomosis (Roux-en-Y); (4) 30-50 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz; and (5) Remnant disconnected but left in situ(1) Excision of lateral 70%-80% of stomach along the greater curvature; and (3) Approximately 100 mL gastric reservoir (sleeve)
Mechanism of action(1) Instantaneous food transfer to small intestine, altering: Gut hormones; Bile acids; Neural signaling; Gut microbiota; Gut-brain-endocrine; Adipocyte-brain axes; and (2) Results in reduced food intake, increased satiety and altered food preferences(1) Alterations in: Gut hormones; Bile acids; Neural signaling; Gut microbiota; Gut-brain-endocrine; Adipocyte-brain axes; and (2) Results in reduced food intake, hunger, increased satiety and altered food preferences
Advantages(1) Significant long-term weight loss; (2) Glycemic control improvement in 90% of cases; (3) Maintain percent EWL in the long term; (4) Hunger reduction and satiety; (5) Food preferences changes; and (6) Increases energy expenditure(1) Significant long-term weight loss (approximately 10% less than RYGB); (2) Glycemic control as effective as RYBG; (3) Maintain percent EWL in the long-term; (4) Hunger reduction and satiety; (5) Food preferences changes; (6) No anatomical rerouting of food; (7) Short length of stay (< 2 d); (8) Technically simpler than RYGB; and (9) Lower complication rate than RYGB
Disadvantages(1) Technically complex (two anastomoses) compared with AGB or VSG; (2) Higher complication rate than AGB or LSG; for example, anastomotic leak or dumping syndrome can occur; (3) Longer length of stay; (4) Long- term vitamin and/or mineral deficiencies (for example, vitamin B12, iron, calcium or folate); (5) Requires lifelong vitamin and/or mineral supplementation; (6) Lifelong dietary changes; (7) Increases alcohol addiction and suicide rates; and (8) postprandial hypoglycemia(1) Anastomotic leak can be difficult to manage; (2) Susceptible to long-term vitamin and/or mineral deficiencies (less common than with RYGB); (3) Precautionary lifelong vitamin and/or mineral supplementation; (4) Lifelong dietary changes; (5) Irreversible; and (6) potential risk of Barrett esophagus
Table 2 Changes in human gut microbiota following bariatric surgery
↑/↓
RYGB
VSG
Akkermansia (Verrucomicrobia)Bulleidia (Firmicutes)
Escherichia (Protobacteria)Roseburia intestinalis (Firmicutes)
Klebsiella (Protobacteria)Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (Firmicutes)
Lactobacillus (Firmicutes)Coprococcus comes (Firmicutes)
Bifidobacterium (Actinobacteria)
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (Firmicutes)
Coprococcus comes (Firmicutes)
Table 3 Literature findings on the postoperative changes of gut microbiota
Ref.Postoperative GM changes
Increased abundance
Decreased abundance
Comments
Graessler et al[71], 2013Enterobacter, Citrobacter, Neurospora, Veillonella, Salmonella, Shigella, E. coli tended to increaseFaecalibacterium, Coprococcus, Helicobacter, Dictyostelium, Epidinium, Anaerostipes, Nakamurella, Methanospirillum, Thermomicrobium-
Kong et al[68], 2013Bacteroides, Alistipes, EscherichiaFirmicutes (Lactobacillus, Dorea, Blautia) BifidobacteriumIncreased richness of GM after RYGB
Palleja et al[50], 2016Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, 10 species belonging to the genus Streptococcus, 4 from Veillonella, 2 from Alistipes, Bifidobacterium dentium, Enterococcus faecalis, F. nucleatum, and Akkermansia muciniphilaE. prausnitzii-
Tremaroli et al[64], 2015Gammaproteobacteria; Several Proteobacteria (Escherichia, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas); E. coli tended to increase but was not statistically significant3 species of Firmicutes; (Clostridium difficile, Clostridium hiranonis, Gemella sanguinis)-