Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Radiol. Mar 28, 2016; 8(3): 322-330
Published online Mar 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i3.322
Table 1 Magnetic resonance imaging pulse sequences in pediatric whole body positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging protocol
Pulse sequencePlaneTR (ms)TE (ms)Thk/sp (mm)Flip angle (°)BW (Hz/Px)FOV (cm)MatrixTA
T1 Dixon VIBE ACCoronal3.61.23/01096540-50192 × 1210:19
T1 VIBEAxial3.92.53/0972035-45288 × 2880:24
T2 HASTE FSAxial1600955/0971030-40320 × 2601:08
EPI DWIAxial11000706/0N/A208430-40160 × 1203:51
STIRCoronal4000484/012020035-40320 × 1924:54
Table 2 Patients and diagnoses
Age at time of diagnosisSexDiagnosisTotal number of PET-MRI examinations
13MaleGastrointestinal stromal tumor3
19MaleUndifferentiated small round cell sarcoma1
12MaleRhabdomyosarcoma1
18MaleNon-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (follicular)1
18MaleHodgkin’s lymphoma1
19MaleNon-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (large B-cell)2
14FemaleParaganglioma1
Table 3 Comparative performance of positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging maximum standardized uptake value and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient for lesion detection compared with positron emission tomography-computed tomography reference
Test characteristicSUVmax > 2.5ADCmin < 0.5 mm2/sADCmin < 1.0 mm2/sADCmin < 1.5 mm2/s
Accuracy100%161.0%68.3%58.5%
Sensitivity100%28.6%70.0%100.0%
Specificity100%95.0%66.7%19.0%
Positive predictive value100%85.7%66.7%54.1%

  • Citation: Pugmire BS, Guimaraes AR, Lim R, Friedmann AM, Huang M, Ebb D, Weinstein H, Catalano OA, Mahmood U, Catana C, Gee MS. Simultaneous whole body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of pediatric cancer: Preliminary experience and comparison with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography. World J Radiol 2016; 8(3): 322-330
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v8/i3/322.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i3.322