Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Radiol. Feb 28, 2016; 8(2): 124-131
Published online Feb 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i2.124
Published online Feb 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i2.124
Imaging study | Utility | Approximate radiation | Length of study | Pediatric sedation | Relative cost | Contrast | Sensitivity diagnosing IBD | Specificity diagnosing IBD |
SBFT | Baseline diagnosis | Pediatric 2 mSv | Total: 1-3 h | None | $ | Oral < 1 L | 45%-76%[8-10] | 67%-100%[8-10] |
Adult 5 mSv | Scan time: 1 h | |||||||
CTE | Baseline diagnosis, follow-up, contraindication to MRE | Pediatric 3-16 mSv | Total: 1 h | None | $$ | Oral 1-2 L, intravenous | 84%[23] | 95%[23] |
Adult 5-20 mSv | Scan time: Several minutes | |||||||
MRE | Baseline diagnosis, follow-up, complications of IBD | None | Total: 1-2 h | Often depending on hospital protocol | $$$ | Oral 1-2 L, intravenous | 93%[23] | 93%[23] |
Scan time 1-2 h | ||||||||
Ultrasound | Screening if low suspicion for IBD, monitoring of disease activity | None | Total: 30-60 min | None | $ | Oral < 1 L | 90%[23] | 96%[23] |
Scan time: 30 min |
- Citation: Haas K, Rubesova E, Bass D. Role of imaging in the evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease: How much is too much? World J Radiol 2016; 8(2): 124-131
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v8/i2/124.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i2.124