Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Radiol. Sep 28, 2015; 7(9): 266-278
Published online Sep 28, 2015. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i9.266
Published online Sep 28, 2015. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i9.266
Source | Worldwide annual per capita effective dose (mSv) |
Natural background | 2.4 |
Diagnostic and medical examinations | 0.4 |
Atmospheric testing | 0.005 |
Chernobyl | 0.002 |
Nuclear power production | 0.0002 |
S. No | Parameter | Technique | |||
DC | MN | FISH | γ-H2AX | ||
1 | Culture time (h) | 48 | 72 | 48 | Not applicable |
2 | Scoring speed (cells/d) | About 150 | About 750 | About 750 | About 100/h |
3 | Type of aberrations detectable | Unstable | Unstable | Stable/ unstable | Unstable |
4 | Period of detection after exposure (yr) | 2-3 | 2-3 | > 30 | 2-3 d |
5 | Cell type/quality | Metaphases/ good | BN cells/good | Metaphases/good | Interphase cells/good |
6 | Baseline frequency | 0.001 | 0.015 | 0.001 | 0.042 |
7 | Sensitivity (Gy) | 0.1 | 0.25 | 0.1 | 0.05 |
- Citation: Perumal V, Sekaran TSG, Raavi V, Basheerudeen SAS, Kanagaraj K, Chowdhury AR, Paul SF. Radiation signature on exposed cells: Relevance in dose estimation. World J Radiol 2015; 7(9): 266-278
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v7/i9/266.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v7.i9.266