Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Radiol. Sep 28, 2012; 4(9): 391-400
Published online Sep 28, 2012. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i9.391
Published online Sep 28, 2012. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i9.391
Table 1 Recommendations from The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guideline for vascular imaging of vertebral artery disease[21]
Size of treatment effect | Indications | Recommended imaging study | Level of evidence (A,B,C1) |
Class 1 (benefit>>>risk) | |||
1 | -With symptoms referable to posterior circulation and subclavian steal syndrome | Noninvasive imaging | C |
2 | -With asymptomatic bilateral carotid occlusions or-Unilateral carotid artery occlusion and incomplete circle of Willis | Noninvasive imaging | C |
3 | -With symptoms of posterior cerebral ischemia or -With symptoms of cerebellar ischemia | Noninvasive imaging (MRA or CTA rather than Doppler US) | C |
Class 2a (benefit>>risk) | |||
1 | -With symptoms of posterior cerebral ischemia or -With symptoms of cerebellar ischemia | Serial noninvasive imaging | C |
2 | -Revascularization candidates with symptoms of posterior cerebral ischemia or -Revascularization candidates with symptoms of cerebellar ischemia | -Noninvasive imaging -DSA (if noninvasive imaging fails) | C |
3 | -Patients undergone vertebral artery revascularization | -Serial noninvasive imaging | C |
Table 2 Review of the long term results of previous studies on endovascular stent treatment of extracranial vertebral artery stenosis
Studies | Stent type | Number of patients | Number of treated stenoses | Rate of complication (%) | Follow-up | ||
Technical | Clinical | Period (mo) | Rate of significant restenosis2 (%) | ||||
Lin et al[74] | Bare stent | 58 | 67 | 0 | 7 | 11 | 25 |
Albuquerque et al[11] | Bare stent | 33 | 33 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 43 |
Chastain et al[12] | Bare stent | 50 | 55 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 10 |
Weber et al[75] | Bare stent | 38 | 38 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 38 |
Cloud et al[76] | Bare stent | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 9 |
SSYLVIA1 study[77] | Bare stent | 18 | 18 | - | - | 6 | 43 |
Akins et al[78] | Bare stent | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 43 |
Taylor et al[79] | Bare stent | 44 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 48 |
Hatano et al[80] | Bare stent | 117 | 117 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 10 |
Lin et al[81] | Bare stent | 80 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 28 |
Jenkins et al[16] | Bare stent | 32 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 3 |
Karamehev et al[82] | Bare stent, DES | 10 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 10 |
Lin et al[27] | DES | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
Zhou et al[30] | DES | 86 | 92 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 17 |
Gupta et al[83] | DES | 27 | 27 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 7 |
Akins et al[78] | DES | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 |
Edgell et al[84] | DES | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
Vajda et al[85] | DES | 48 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 12 |
Lugmayr et al[86] | DES | 7 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 63 |
- Citation: Kocak B, Korkmazer B, Islak C, Kocer N, Kizilkilic O. Endovascular treatment of extracranial vertebral artery stenosis. World J Radiol 2012; 4(9): 391-400
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v4/i9/391.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v4.i9.391