Original Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Radiol. Jul 28, 2012; 4(7): 291-301
Published online Jul 28, 2012. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i7.291
Table 1 Characteristics of the in vivo experiments
Mouse numberNumber of daysNumber of injections
Multiple injections and day of examination
143
4
3
4
223
2
322
4
Influence of the size of the arterial region of interest
133
3
2
232
3
3
324
3
424
3
Table 2 In vitro and in vivo experiments: Statistical analyses
In vitro results
In vivo results
Repositioning of the probe: Fisher’s test P valuesVariation of the flow rate: ANOVA P valuesMultiple injections: ANOVA P valuesDay of examination: ANOVA P values
Semi-quantitative microvascularization parameters
PI0.077< 0.0010.080< 0.001
TPI0.3020.0040.5950.641
Slope of the WI0.0590.0060.141< 0.001
MTT0.562< 0.0010.8850.016
AUC0.731< 0.0010.0730.01
AUWI0.2760.0240.0600.001
AUWO0.8600.0060.0780.016
Quantitative microvascularization parameters
BF0.0550.0040.0710.116
BV0.0630.0530.4290.015
MTT0.1310.6490.1260.645
Table 3 Areas of the arterial region of interests associated with the two in vivo studies described in the article
Mean (mm2)SDMinMax
First in vivo study1.170.60.42.3
Second in vivo study3.650.33.54.1
Table 4 Influence of the size of the arterial region of interest (in vivo experiments: Statistical analyses)
Day of examination : P-ANOVA values
Semi-quantitative microvascularization parameters
PI0.027
TPI0.010
Slope of the WI0.070
MTT< 0.001
AUC0.808
AUWI0.562
AUWO0.832
Quantitative microvascularization parameters
BF< 0.001
BV< 0.001
MTT0.033