Review
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Radiol. Nov 28, 2011; 3(11): 256-265
Published online Nov 28, 2011. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v3.i11.256
Table 1 Major indications for evaluation of the urinary tract using computed tomography
Urinary colic
Hematuria
Complicated infection
Neoplasm
Renal donor evaluation
Congenital anomalies
Structural abnormalities
Abdominal trauma
Table 2 Radiation dose, scanning parameters, and diagnostic performances of computed tomography examination using low dose protocols in urolithiasis
AuthorsYrLow dose CT protocols
Diagnostic performance
Effective dose (mSv)
CT scannerkVpmA (mAs)PitchS.T. (mm)Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)Accuracy (%)
Liu et al[7]2000SDCT120(280)279796972.8
Meagher et al[8]2001SDCT, 4MDCT120-13063-1301.4-1.8593NANA3.5 (2.8-4.5)
Hamm et al[9]20024MDCT12070259697NA1.5
Heneghan et al[10]2003SDCT140100 (76)1.55NANA90-946.4
4MDCT0.7511
Tack et al[11]20034MDCT120(30)1.5390-9594-10093-981.2-1.9
Knöpfle et al[12]20034MDCT12070259897NA0.97 (male)/ 1.35 (female)
Kluner et al[13]200616MDCT12020 (6.9)1.4359795NA0.5-0.7
Poletti et al[14]20074MDCT12074 (30)1.25586-9697-100NANA
Table 3 Computed tomography protocols for suspected urolithiasis in our institute
CT scannerGE (64 MDCT)Siemens (64 MDCT)
Scan rangeTop of kidney-pubic symphysisTop of kidney-pubic symphysis
Detector collimation (mm)64 × 0.62524 × 1.2
Pitch1.3751.2
Rotation time (s)0.50.5
Kvp120120
mA150-450Reference mA = 160
Noise index25 (30 if follow-up exam)
KernelStandardB31F
Reconstruction modePlus
Slice thickness (mm)5 (2.5)5 (2.5)
Slice overlap5 (2.5)5 (2.5)
Table 4 Radiation dose and computed tomography scanning parameters of computed tomography urography using standard dose and low dose protocols
AuthorsYrCT scannerAcquisiton phasekVpmA (mAs)PitchEffective dose (mSv)Supplement
Standard CT urographic protocols
Caoili et al[26]20024MDCTUnenhanced120150-2400.7525-35
Nephrographic100-2800.75
Excretory150-2801.5
Nawfel et al[25]20044MDCTUnenhanced120(155-200)1.0-1.256.4 ± 1.3
Nephrographic(155-200)1.0-1.252.5 ± 0.34
Excretory(165-185)0.65-1.05.9 ± 1.5
Low dose CT urographic protocols
Coppenrath et al[27]20064MDCTExcretory90(15-100)0.875-1.750.78 (male)/1.08 (female)
16MDCT100(17-100)1-1.51.06-1.19 (male)
0.76-0.86 (female)
Kemper et al[28]20074MDCTExcretory120(70)1.252.7 (male)/4.1(female)
Yanaga et al[29]200940MDCTExcretory80(300)0.7812.9Adaptive noise reduction filter
Kekelidze et al[30]201016MDCTUnenhanced120(55)0.753.4AEC
Enhanced(165)1.259.8Split-bolus technique
Table 5 Computed tomography protocols for computed tomography urography in our institute
Non-contrastPost-contrast1
Scan rangeTop of kidney to base of bladderTop of kidney to base of bladder
Detector collimation (mm)64 × 0.62564 × 0.625
Pitch1.3751.375
kVp120120
mA150-450150-450
Noise index25 (30 for follow-up exam)10 (< 60 kg)
12.5 (61-90 kg)
15 (> 90 kg)
Table speed (mm/rotation)5555
Table 6 Radiation dose and computed tomography protocols for renal donors
AuthorYrCT scannerAcquisition phasekVpmA(mAs)PitchCTDIvol in mGyDLP in mGy cmSupplements
Kim et al[49]20034MDCTUnenhanced1202001.510.19NA
Renal CTA12.88NA
Excretory10.19NA
Wintersperger et al[50]200516MDCTAbdominal CTA120400 (200)115.6673.9
10010.0447.0
Sahani et al[45]200716MDCTRenal CTA140(210)0.9425 ± 3NAAEC
12017 ± 4NAUsing NI of 15
10012 ± 3NA
Zamboni et al[42]201064MDCTLow dose 4-phase12050-150NANA2021 ± 545
Low dose 3-phaseNA1501 ± 418AEC
Low dose 2-phaseNA981 ± 381Using NI of 15.86
Low dose 2-phase*NA676 ± 284
Table 7 Computed tomography protocols for living renal donors in our institute
UnenhancedArterialExcretory
Scan rangeDome of liver-iliac crestDome of liver-iliac crestTop of kidney-iliac crest
Detector collimation (mm)64 × 0.62564 × 0.62564 × 0.625
Pitch1.3751.3751.375
kVp120120100
mA150-450150-550 (150-800 for patient > 135 kg)150-450
Noise index2028 (< 60 kg)18
32 (61-90 kg)
35 (> 90 kg)
Table speed (mm/rotation)555555