Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Radiol. Feb 28, 2025; 17(2): 102462
Published online Feb 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i2.102462
Published online Feb 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i2.102462
Table 1 The patients’ baseline characteristics
Characteristics | mean ± SD |
Males:Females | 37:16 |
Age (years) | 71.63 ± 11.99 |
Body height (cm) | 160.57 ± 9.55 |
Body weight (kg) | 60.65 ± 10.5 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 23.45 ± 3.21 |
CTDIvol (mGy) | 17.38 ± 4.42 |
SSDE (mGy) | 23.92 ± 4.79 |
Table 2 Comparison of the quantitative image analysis of blood vessels and hepatic parenchyma, mean ± SD
Characteristics | PVP | EP | CE-boost (EP) | aP value | bP value |
CT value (HU) | |||||
Main portal vein | 185.48 ± 25.51 | 135.97 ± 18.00 | 182.53 ± 27.00 | 0.50 | < 0.01 |
Right portal vein | 183.65 ± 24.06 | 133.65 ± 16.45 | 179.18 ± 22.47 | 0.36 | < 0.01 |
Left portal vein | 186.21 ± 24.54 | 134.74 ± 16.69 | 181.32 ± 23.89 | 0.36 | < 0.01 |
Segmental branch of the portal vein | 177.23 ± 20.31 | 132.20 ± 15.70 | 171.61 ± 19.99 | 0.17 | < 0.01 |
Inferior vena cava | 137.11 ± 23.09 | 122.85 ± 16.61 | 164.10 ± 24.40 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
Hepatic parenchyma | 120.25 ± 15.67 | 100.60 ± 12.93 | 120.36 ± 16.54 | 0.96 | < 0.01 |
Image noise | 18.04 ± 3.33 | 17.68 ± 3.62 | 14.15 ± 5.21 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
Contrast-to-noise ratio | |||||
Main portal vein | 3.72 ± 1.44 | 2.08 ± 1.09 | 4.94 ± 2.66 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
Right portal vein | 3.61 ± 1.40 | 1.95 ± 1.00 | 4.69 ± 2.42 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
Left portal vein | 3.77± 1.40 | 2.04 ± 1.05 | 4.94 ± 2.70 | 0.02 | < 0.01 |
Segmental branch of the portal vein | 3.26 ± 1.15 | 1.85 ± 0.83 | 4.08 ± 1.94 | 0.03 | < 0.01 |
Inferior vena cava | 0.95 ± 1.63 | 1.30 ± 0.95 | 3.49 ± 2.30 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
Hepatic parenchyma | 3.07 ± 1.09 | 1.90 ± 0.83 | 3.34 ± 1.74 | 0.62 | < 0.01 |
Signal-to-noise ratio | |||||
Main portal vein | 10.61 ± 2.30 | 7.97 ± 1.90 | 14.48 ± 5.42 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
Right portal vein | 10.50 ± 2.21 | 7.85 ± 1.84 | 14.23 ± 5.21 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
Left portal vein | 10.66 ± 2.31 | 7.94 ± 1.97 | 14.48 ± 5.53 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
Segmental branch of the portal vein | 10.15 ± 2.13 | 7.75 ± 1.74 | 13.62 ± 4.80 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
Inferior vena cava | 7.84 ± 1.98 | 7.20 ± 1.70 | 13.03 ± 4.97 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
Hepatic parenchyma | 6.89 ± 1.55 | 5.90 ± 1.35 | 9.54 ± 3.44 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
Figure of merit | |||||
Main portal vein | 0.94 ± 0.75 | 0.33 ± 0.49 | 1.97 ± 2.83 | 0.01 | < 0.01 |
Right portal vein | 0.89 ± 0.75 | 0.28 ± 0.37 | 1.72 ± 2.40 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
Left portal vein | 0.98 ± 0.79 | 0.32 ± 0.40 | 1.99 ± 2.84 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
Segmental branch of the portal vein | 0.71 ± 0.51 | 0.24 ± 0.24 | 1.24 ± 1.32 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
Inferior vena cava | 0.20 ± 0.47 | 0.15 ± 0.25 | 1.08 ± 1.87 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
Hepatic parenchyma | 0.68 ± 0.50 | 0.28 ± 0.23 | 0.96 ± 1.03 | 0.67 | < 0.01 |
Table 3 Comparison by qualitative image analysis, mean ± SD
Characteristics | PVP | EP | CE-boost (EP) | aP value | bP value |
Vascular visualization | |||||
Portal vein | 4 ± 0.00 | 3.97 ± 0.15 | 4 ± 0.00 | NA | 0.16 |
Segmental branch of the portal vein | 3.97 ± 0.15 | 3.12 ± 0.55 | 3.88 ± 0.42 | 0.14 | < 0.01 |
Lesion conspicuity | 3.29 ± 0.60 | 3.21 ± 0.69 | 3.63 ± 0.51 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
Image noise | 3.85 ± 0.34 | 3.85 ± 0.34 | 3.14 ± 0.44 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
Table 4 Distribution of subjective image scoring for different protocols by the two radiologists
Blood vessel visualization (1/2/3/4) | Reviewer 1 | Reviewer 2 | Agreement (κ) |
Portal vein | |||
PVP | 0/0/0/52 | 0/0/0/52 | NA |
EP | 0/0/2/50 | 0/0/1/51 | 0.66 |
CE boost (EP) | 0/0/0/52 | 0/0/0/52 | NA |
Segmental branch of the portal vein | |||
PVP | 0/0/2/50 | 0/0/1/51 | 0.66 |
EP | 1/2/39/10 | 1/4/35/12 | 0.66 |
CE boost (EP) | 0/2/2/48 | 0/2/3/47 | 0.64 |
Lesion conspicuity (1/2/3/4) | |||
PVP | 0/6/21/25 | 0/6/29/17 | 0.43 |
EP | 1/6/26/19 | 1/5/28/18 | 0.81 |
CE boost (EP) | 0/3/15/34 | 0/2/14/36 | 0.38 |
Image noise (1/2/3/4) | |||
PVP | 0/0/10/42 | 0/0/6/46 | 0.71 |
EP | 0/0/10/42 | 0/0/6/46 | 0.71 |
CE boost (EP) | 0/2/41/9 | 0/2/40/10 | 0.84 |
- Citation: Tachibana Y, Otsuka K, Shiroo T, Asayama Y. Equilibrium phase images of the liver using a contrast-enhancement boost instead of the portal vein phase. World J Radiol 2025; 17(2): 102462
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v17/i2/102462.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i2.102462