Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Radiol. Feb 28, 2025; 17(2): 102462
Published online Feb 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i2.102462
Table 1 The patients’ baseline characteristics
Characteristics
mean ± SD
Males:Females37:16
Age (years)71.63 ± 11.99
Body height (cm)160.57 ± 9.55
Body weight (kg)60.65 ± 10.5
BMI (kg/m2)23.45 ± 3.21
CTDIvol (mGy)17.38 ± 4.42
SSDE (mGy)23.92 ± 4.79
Table 2 Comparison of the quantitative image analysis of blood vessels and hepatic parenchyma, mean ± SD
Characteristics
PVP
EP
CE-boost (EP)
aP value
bP value
CT value (HU)
Main portal vein185.48 ± 25.51135.97 ± 18.00182.53 ± 27.000.50< 0.01
Right portal vein183.65 ± 24.06133.65 ± 16.45179.18 ± 22.470.36< 0.01
Left portal vein186.21 ± 24.54134.74 ± 16.69181.32 ± 23.890.36< 0.01
Segmental branch of the portal vein177.23 ± 20.31132.20 ± 15.70171.61 ± 19.990.17< 0.01
Inferior vena cava137.11 ± 23.09122.85 ± 16.61164.10 ± 24.40< 0.01< 0.01
Hepatic parenchyma120.25 ± 15.67100.60 ± 12.93120.36 ± 16.540.96< 0.01
Image noise18.04 ± 3.3317.68 ± 3.6214.15 ± 5.21< 0.01< 0.01
Contrast-to-noise ratio
Main portal vein3.72 ± 1.442.08 ± 1.094.94 ± 2.66< 0.01< 0.01
Right portal vein3.61 ± 1.401.95 ± 1.004.69 ± 2.42< 0.01< 0.01
Left portal vein3.77± 1.402.04 ± 1.054.94 ± 2.700.02< 0.01
Segmental branch of the portal vein3.26 ± 1.151.85 ± 0.834.08 ± 1.940.03< 0.01
Inferior vena cava0.95 ± 1.631.30 ± 0.953.49 ± 2.30< 0.01< 0.01
Hepatic parenchyma3.07 ± 1.091.90 ± 0.833.34 ± 1.740.62< 0.01
Signal-to-noise ratio
Main portal vein10.61 ± 2.307.97 ± 1.9014.48 ± 5.42< 0.01< 0.01
Right portal vein10.50 ± 2.217.85 ± 1.8414.23 ± 5.21< 0.01< 0.01
Left portal vein10.66 ± 2.317.94 ± 1.9714.48 ± 5.53< 0.01< 0.01
Segmental branch of the portal vein10.15 ± 2.137.75 ± 1.7413.62 ± 4.80< 0.01< 0.01
Inferior vena cava7.84 ± 1.987.20 ± 1.7013.03 ± 4.97< 0.01< 0.01
Hepatic parenchyma6.89 ± 1.555.90 ± 1.359.54 ± 3.44< 0.01< 0.01
Figure of merit
Main portal vein0.94 ± 0.750.33 ± 0.491.97 ± 2.830.01< 0.01
Right portal vein0.89 ± 0.750.28 ± 0.371.72 ± 2.40< 0.01< 0.01
Left portal vein0.98 ± 0.790.32 ± 0.401.99 ± 2.84< 0.01< 0.01
Segmental branch of the portal vein0.71 ± 0.510.24 ± 0.241.24 ± 1.32< 0.01< 0.01
Inferior vena cava0.20 ± 0.470.15 ± 0.251.08 ± 1.87< 0.01< 0.01
Hepatic parenchyma0.68 ± 0.500.28 ± 0.230.96 ± 1.030.67< 0.01
Table 3 Comparison by qualitative image analysis, mean ± SD
Characteristics
PVP
EP
CE-boost (EP)
aP value
bP value
Vascular visualization
Portal vein4 ± 0.003.97 ± 0.154 ± 0.00NA0.16
Segmental branch of the portal vein3.97 ± 0.153.12 ± 0.553.88 ± 0.420.14< 0.01
Lesion conspicuity3.29 ± 0.603.21 ± 0.693.63 ± 0.51< 0.01< 0.01
Image noise3.85 ± 0.343.85 ± 0.343.14 ± 0.44< 0.01< 0.01
Table 4 Distribution of subjective image scoring for different protocols by the two radiologists
Blood vessel visualization (1/2/3/4)
Reviewer 1
Reviewer 2
Agreement (κ)
Portal vein
PVP0/0/0/520/0/0/52NA
EP0/0/2/500/0/1/510.66
CE boost (EP)0/0/0/520/0/0/52NA
Segmental branch of the portal vein
PVP0/0/2/500/0/1/510.66
EP1/2/39/101/4/35/120.66
CE boost (EP)0/2/2/480/2/3/470.64
Lesion conspicuity (1/2/3/4)
PVP0/6/21/250/6/29/170.43
EP1/6/26/191/5/28/180.81
CE boost (EP)0/3/15/340/2/14/360.38
Image noise (1/2/3/4)
PVP0/0/10/420/0/6/460.71
EP0/0/10/420/0/6/460.71
CE boost (EP)0/2/41/90/2/40/100.84