Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Radiol. Jun 28, 2023; 15(6): 201-215
Published online Jun 28, 2023. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v15.i6.201
Published online Jun 28, 2023. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v15.i6.201
Table 1 Imaging features considered in the management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms
Endovascular therapy | Surgical management | |
Non-contrast computed tomography | Absence of parenchymal hematoma | Presence of intra-parenchymal hematoma |
Aneurysm characters | Posterior circulation aneurysms | Middle cerebral and pericallosal arteries aneurysm |
Small aneurysm neck < 4 mm | Aneurysm diameter > 15 mm Wide neck aneurysm > 4 mm | |
Aneurysm diameter < 15 mm | Abnormal configuration | |
Unilobar configuration | Aneurysmal sac incorporating arterial branches | |
Multiple aneurysms | Presence of intraluminal thrombus | |
Calcification located at the aneurysm neck | ||
Perianeurysmal findings | Presence of vasospasm | Vascular variants interfere with endovascular management |
Table 2 Inter-observer agreement of computed tomography and computed tomography angiography features of aneurysm
Signs | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | K | 95% CI | P value | Agreement, % | |
NCCT findings | |||||||
SAH Fisher scale | 3.47 ± 0.6 | 3.33 ± 0.4 | 0.84 | 0.78-0.85 | < 0.001 | 89.50 | |
Hydrocephalus (HCP) | Negative (N) | 93 | 95 | 0.91 | 0.85-0.97 | < 0.001 | 95.90 |
Positive (p) | 53 | 51 | |||||
Intraparenchymal hematoma (IPH) | Negative (N) | 105 | 105 | 1 | 1.0-1.0 | < 0.001 | 100.00 |
Positive (p) | 41 | 41 | |||||
Aneurysm features | |||||||
Number | Total | 166 | 169 | 0.95 | 0.89-1.0 | < 0.001 | 98.80 |
Single | 126 | 127 | |||||
Multiple | 40 | 42 | |||||
Size | Small | 55 | 57 | 0.89 | 0.83-0.96 | < 0.001 | 94.70 |
Medium | 101 | 102 | |||||
Large | 5 | 5 | |||||
Giant | 5 | 5 | |||||
Site | Anterior | 156 | 157 | 0.94 | 0.83-1.0 | < 0.001 | 99.40 |
Posterior | 10 | 12 | |||||
Shape | Saccular | 160 | 162 | 0.92 | 0.76-1.0 | < 0.001 | 99.40 |
Fusiform | 4 | 4 | |||||
Serpentine | 2 | 2 | |||||
Blister | 0 | 1 | |||||
Margin | Sharp | 71 | 75 | 0.95 | 0.90-0.99 | < 0.001 | 97.60 |
Lobulated | 95 | 94 | |||||
Thrombus | 6 | 9 | 0.82 | 0.65-0.99 | < 0.001 | 97.60 | |
Calcification | 9 | 9 | 1 | 1.0-1.0 | < 0.001 | 100.00 | |
Branch incorporation | 50 | 55 | 0.9 | 0.83-0.97 | < 0.001 | 95.90 | |
Orientation | 0.95 | 0.91-0.97 | < 0.001 | 96.50 | |||
Perianeurysmal findings | |||||||
Vasospasm | 21 | 25 | 0.9 | 0.81-0.99 | < 0.001 | 97.60 | |
Perianeurysmal cyst | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.0-1.0 | < 0.001 | 100.0 | |
Other vascular lesions | 2 | 4 | 0.82 | 0.59-1.0 | < 0.001 | 98.80 | |
Bony relations | 23 | 26 | 0.88 | 0.78-0.98 | < 0.001 | 97.00 | |
Bone fracture | 1 | 1 | |||||
Vascular variant | 84 | 88 | 0.89 | 0.83-0.96 | < 0.001 | 94.90 | |
Overall agreement | 0.95 | 0.94-0.96 | < 0.001 | 97.80 |
Table 3 Inter-observer agreement of computed tomography angiography locations of aneurysm
Parent artery | Reader 1 | Reader 2 |
ACOM | 73 | 73 |
ACA | 5 | 6 |
RT ICA | 20 | 20 |
LT ICA | 16 | 16 |
RT MCA | 21 | 22 |
LT MCA | 20 | 20 |
Basilar | 8 | 9 |
LT PCA | 1 | 1 |
RT Vertebral | 1 | 1 |
LT SCA | 0 | 1 |
K | 95%CI | P value |
0.97 | 0.87-1.0 | < 0.001 |
Arterial segment | Reader 1 | Reader 2 |
ACOM- Lt ACA complex | 36 | 36 |
ACOM- Rt ACA complex | 34 | 34 |
ACOM proper | 3 | 3 |
A1 | 1 | 1 |
RT A2 | 1 | 1 |
LT A2 | 0 | 1 |
Azygous A2 | 2 | 2 |
A3 | 1 | 1 |
RT MCA bifurcation | 14 | 14 |
LT MCA bifurcation | 15 | 15 |
RT M1 | 4 | 4 |
LT M1 | 3 | 3 |
RT M2 | 3 | 3 |
LT M2 | 2 | 2 |
M4 | 0 | 1 |
RT PCOM | 12 | 12 |
LT PCOM | 9 | 9 |
RT ICA Terminus | 4 | 4 |
LT ICA Terminus | 2 | 2 |
RT Cavernous ICA | 4 | 4 |
LT Cavernous ICA | 5 | 5 |
Basilar tip | 4 | 4 |
Mid Basilar | 2 | 3 |
Basilar Perforators | 2 | 2 |
Rt V4 | 1 | 1 |
LT SCA | 0 | 1 |
Lt P1 | 1 | 1 |
K | 95%CI | P value |
0.97 | 0.87-1.0 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Inter-observer agreement of computed tomography angiography measurements of aneurysm
Size | Dome | Neck | Dome/neck ratio | |||||
Reader 1 | Reader 2 | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | |
Mean | 7.4 | 7.4 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
Median | 6 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
SD | 5.44 | 5.47 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Minimum | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Maximum | 40 | 42 | 22 | 22 | 20 | 20 | 4.7 | 5.6 |
ICC | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.98 | ||||
95%CI | (0.96-0.98) | (0.96-0.97) | (0.95-0.97) | (0.97-0.98) |
- Citation: Elmokadem AH, Elged BA, Abdel Razek A, El-Serougy LG, Kasem MA, EL-Adalany MA. Interobserver reliability of computed tomography angiography in the assessment of ruptured intracranial aneurysm and impact on patient management. World J Radiol 2023; 15(6): 201-215
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v15/i6/201.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v15.i6.201