Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Radiol. Apr 28, 2022; 14(4): 82-90
Published online Apr 28, 2022. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v14.i4.82
Table 1 Total abdominal muscle area and total abdominal muscle area corrected for age in the two groups

TAMA (cm2)
TAMA_C (cm2)
ccRCCa group (mean, range, and SD)164.02 (91, 233.5 ± 31.86)3.08 (1.29, 5.83 ± 1.06)
ccRCCp group (mean, range, and standard deviation)150.91 (76.3, 218.3 ± 30.34)2.67 (1, 4.67 ± 0.91)
P0.020.02
Table 2 Total abdominal muscle area of clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients with low Fuhrman grade (I/II) and high Fuhrman grade (III/IV)

TAMA (cm2)
ccRCC patients with low fuhrman grade (I/II) (mean, range, and standard deviation)158.27 (83.2-233.5), 35.41
ccRCC patients with high Fuhrman grade (III/IV) (mean, range, and standard deviation)155.71 (76.3-219.2), 29.44
P0.66
Table 3 Total abdominal muscle area of alive and dead clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients

TAMA (cm2)
Alive ccRCC patients162.02
(mean, range, and standard deviation)91, 233.5 ± 28.42
Dead ccRCC patients150.91
(mean, range, and standard deviation)76.3, 219.2 ± 34.84
P0.0008