Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Radiol. Nov 28, 2018; 10(11): 162-171
Published online Nov 28, 2018. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v10.i11.162
Published online Nov 28, 2018. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v10.i11.162
Table 1 Magnetic resonance imaging parameters for the sequences
Imaging parameter | Tesla | Sequence | ||||
Sag PD | Sag PD-FS | Sag T1CE | Ax PD-FS | Ax T1CE | ||
Repetition time (ms) | 1.5T | 2000 | 3000 | 438 | 3400 | 714 |
3T | 2054-3940 | 3000-4150 | 530-782 | 3000-5300 | 530-782 | |
Echo time (ms) | 1.5T | 46 | 46 | 12 | 43 | 13 |
3T | 22-30 | 30-43 | 12-20 | 13-45 | 12-20 | |
Matrix resolution (mm) | 1.5T | 0.7 × 0.7 | 0.7 × 0.7 | 0.7 × 0.7 | 0.6 × 0.6 | 0.6 × 0.6 |
3T | 0.3 × 3.3 | 0.3 × 0.3 | 0.3 × 0.3 | 0.3 × 0.3 | 0.3 × 0.3 | |
Field of view (mm) | 1.5T | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 |
3T | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | |
Slice thickness (mm) | 1.5T | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 5 | 5 |
3T | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3 | 3 |
Table 2 Inter and intraobserver reliability
Intra-observer | Inter-observer | ||||
A1-A2 | A1-B | A1-C | B-C | ||
Thickness | T1CE | 0.74 (0.65-0.81) | 0.69 (0.60-0.77) | 0.67 (0.56-0.75) | 0.55 (0.42-0.65) |
PD | 0.68 (0.58-0.76) | 0.45 (0.31-0.57) | 0.49 (0.35-0.61) | 0.54 (0.41-0.65) | |
PD-FS | 0.71 (0.61-0.78) | 0.59 (0.48-0.69) | 0.49 (0.35-0.60) | 0.63 (0.52-0.72) | |
SM score | T1CE | 0.88 (0.83-0.91) | 0.67 (0.56-0.75) | 0.78 (0.70-0.83) | 0.56 (0.43-0.66) |
PD | 0.88 (0.83-0.91) | 0.49 (0.35-0.60) | 0.72 (0.63-0.79) | 0.50 (0.36-0.61) | |
PD-FS | 0.89 (0.85-0.92) | 0.51 (0.38-0.63) | 0.79 (0.71-0.84) | 0.62 (0.50-0.71) | |
MOAKS | T1CE | 0.76 (0.68-0.82) | 0.64 (0.53-0.73) | 0.54 (0.41-0.65) | 0.49 (0.35-0.60) |
Synovitis-score | T1CE | 0.93 (0.91-0.95) | 0.65 (0.54-0.74) | 0.72 (0.62-0.79) | 0.53 (0.40-0.64) |
WORMS (effusion synovitis) | PD-FS | 0.77 (0.70-0.83) | 0.70 (0.61-0.78) | 0.61 (0.50-0.71) | 0.68 (0.58-0.76) |
Effusion-diameter | PD-FS | 0.89 (0.85-0.92) | 0.77 (0.69-0.83) | 0.81 (0.75-0.86) | 0.68 (0.58-0.76) |
Table 3 Correlation with the MOAKS score
1.5T | 3T | Total | ||
Thickness | T1CE | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.47 |
PD | 0.32 | 0.49 | 0.44 | |
PD-FS | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.41 | |
SM score | T1CE | 0.55 | 0.68 | 0.64 |
PD | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.63 | |
PD-FS | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.71 | |
Synovitis-score | T1CE | 0.68 | 0.51 | 0.56 |
WORMS (effusion synovitis) | PD-FS | 0.48 | 0.55 | 0.53 |
Effusion-diameter | PD-FS | 0.58 | 0.48 | 0.51 |
Table 4 Correlation with the parapatellar synovitis score
1.5T | 3T | Total | ||
Thickness | T1CE | 0.63 | 0.73 | 0.70 |
PD | 0.52 | 0.45 | 0.47 | |
PD-FS | 0.44 | 0.51 | 0.49 | |
SM score | T1CE | 0.85 | 0.79 | 0.81 |
PD | 0.42 | 0.76 | 0.66 | |
PD-FS | 0.79 | 0.59 | 0.65 | |
MOAKS | T1CE | 0.66 | 0.56 | 0.59 |
PD-FS | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.56 | |
WORMS (effusion synovitis) | PD-FS | 0.64 | 0.81 | 0.76 |
Effusion-diameter | PD-FS | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.59 |
- Citation: Hagiwara S, Yang A, Takao S, Kaneko Y, Nozaki T, Yoshioka H. New scoring system in assessment of Hoffa’s fat pad synovitis: A comparative study with established scoring systems. World J Radiol 2018; 10(11): 162-171
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v10/i11/162.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v10.i11.162