Topic Highlight Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Radiol. Jan 28, 2015; 7(1): 7-16
Published online Jan 28, 2015. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i1.7
Conventional radiological strategy of common gastrointestinal neoplasms
Yi-Zhuo Li, Pei-Hong Wu, Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
Author contributions: Li YZ and Wu PH both contributed to this paper.
Conflict-of-interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicting interests, commercial, personal, political, intellectual or religious.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Pei-Hong Wu, MD, Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China. wupeihong56@126.com
Telephone: +86-20-87343272 Fax: +86-20-87343272
Received: May 18, 2014
Peer-review started: May 19, 2014
First decision: June 27, 2014
Revised: November 21, 2014
Accepted: December 3, 2014
Article in press: December 10, 2014
Published online: January 28, 2015
Processing time: 239 Days and 23.1 Hours

Abstract

This article summarizes the clinical characteristics and imaging features of common gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasms in terms of conventional radiological imaging methods. Barium studies are readily available for displaying primary malignancies and are minimally or not at all invasive. A neoplasm may be manifested as various imaging findings, including mucosal disruption, soft mass, ulcer, submucosal invasion and lumen stenosis on barium studies. Benign tumors typically appear as smoothly marginated intramural masses. Malignant neoplasms most often appear as irregular infiltrative lesions on barium examination. Tumor extension to adjacent GI segments may be indistinct on barium images. Cross-sectional images such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging may provide more accurate details of the adjacent organ invasion, omental or peritoneal spread.

Key Words: Gastrointestinal, Barium enema, Computed tomography, Magnetic resonance imaging, Neoplasm

Core tip: Gastrointestinal neoplasms are very common diseases. A neoplasm may be manifested as a wide spectrum of imaging findings. Barium studies are readily available for displaying primary malignancies in a short time and at low cost. Malignant neoplasms most often appear as irregular infiltrative lesions on barium examination. Cross-sectional imaging such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging may provide more accurate details of the adjacent organ invasion, omental or peritoneal spread.



INTRODUCTION

The techniques of gastrointestinal (GI) radiology have changed dramatically in the last three decades. The basic mission of modern GI radiology is earlier diagnosis, a better avenue to evidence-based treatment options, to predict tumor response to treatment and non-invasive follow-up[1].

Barium enema can provide valuable information. multislice computed tomography (CT) has proven to provide more valuable information for abdominal imaging. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with its high soft tissue contrast has documented its clinical application in abdominal imaging. Positron emission tomography (PET) has excellent tissue penetration. However, apart from conventional imaging such as barium enema and multi-slice CT, the other options should increase their specificity and sensitivity using exogenous tracers or contrast agents.

The objective of this paper is to review the conventional radiological imaging of common GI neoplasms.

ESOPHAGEAL DISEASE
Esophageal carcinoma

About 80% of esophageal neoplasms are malignant and more than 90% of these are squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) or adenocarcinomas[2].

SCC is the most common malignant esophageal neoplasm worldwide. It arises from epithelial cells with stratified squamous differentiation, which develops from precursor lesions of intraepithelial neoplasia[3]. Alcohol and tobacco use are the most important risk factors for SCC of the esophagus. Most SCCs occur in the middle third of the esophagus, then the upper and lower third of the esophagus[4,5]. Pathologically, SCCs appear as a variety of gross morphological types, polypoid mass, flat or ulcerated lesions. About 65% of SCC patients are men and the peak age range is from 60 to 74 years[6]. Adenocarcinomas are the second common malignant tumor of the esophagus. The majority of esophageal adenocarcinomas develop from malignant degeneration of underlying Barrett epithelium, which are located in the distal esophagus, and the gastroesophageal junction, and these tumors have a tendency to invade the stomach[7]. About 85% of esophageal adenocarcinoma patients are men[2].

On barium esophagography, most SCCs show an infiltrative irregular luminal stricture, filling defect, with or without areas of ulceration (Figures 1-3).

Figure 1
Figure 1 A 60-year-old male patient with squamous cell carcinoma in the first third section of esophagus. Polypoid-type lesions, presented as a filling defect with luminal narrowing and without ulceration.
Figure 2
Figure 2 A 60-year-old male with squamous cell carcinoma. On barium esophagography, infiltration in the upper third of esophageal carcinoma, with irregular luminal narrowing, mucosal destruction, dilatation and abrupt proximal borders. Prestenotic dilatation is also present.
Figure 3
Figure 3 A 59-year-old male with advanced esophageal carcinoma. Asymmetric stenosis of the first third esophagus, with central, large irregular ulceration, surrounded by a radiolucent rim of neoplasmatic infiltration.

On CT, esophageal cancer shows a soft tissue mass or localized irregular esophageal wall thickening, with irregular luminal narrowing. The located wall thickening may be asymmetrical in the early stage and concentric thickening in the advanced stage. The lesions usually show moderate enhancement (Figure 4). CT plays very important roles in evaluating the primary tumor, mediastinal invasion, lymph node involvement, distant metastases, such as liver, lungs and bones, and the complications of esophageal obstruction.

Figure 4
Figure 4 A 61-year-old male with squamous cell carcinoma in the first third section of esophagus. At computed tomography, esophageal cancer shows a soft tissue mass, with irregular luminal narrowing. The located wall thickening was asymmetric. The lesion shows moderate arterial phase enhancement (A) and slight venous phase enhancement (B). The enlarged lymph node metastasis is shown in the upper right paratracheal (C).

On MRI, esophageal carcinoma reveals an irregular soft tissue mass with low T1 weighted signal intensity and intermediate T2 weighted signal intensity. MRI was reported to be comparable to CT in evaluating the tumor’s features, including local spread, distant metastases and lymph node involvement[8,9].

On 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET, esophageal carcinoma and its metastases show avid uptake value. However, the regional lymph nodes may be obscured by the high uptake tissue of primary tumor[10].

Other malignant esophageal neoplasms

Leiomyosarcoma is a relatively more common malignant tumor of esophagus than the others, apart from esophageal carcinoma. On esophagography, this tumor shows intramural mass with large exophytic parts, with or without calcification and tracking areas. On CT images, they reveal heterogeneous mass with exophytic edge[11]. On MRI, they appear as an intermediate signal intensity heterogeneous mass with exophytic edge on T1W images and slightly high signal intensity on T2W images.

The lesions usually show moderate arterial phase enhancement both on CT and MR images.

Benign esophageal neoplasms

Benign tumors are usually small and without ulceration, peritumoral invasion or distant metastases and do not cause symptoms, so less than 1% of esophageal tumors gain clinical attention[12]. General imaging features of these tumors show a smooth intramural or intraluminal homogeneous mass, without necrosis or peritumoral spread.

Leiomyomas are the commonest benign esophageal neoplasm. They arise in the mature smooth muscle cells of the esophagus. Most patients with esophageal leiomyomas are asymptomatic, the rest may develop dysphagia or pain, depending on the lesion’s size and the amount of encroachment on the esophageal lumen. On barium examination, an intramural mass with a sharply defined, smooth or lobulated filling defect forms the typical findings[13] (Figure 5). On CT, esophageal leiomyomas show a sharply marginated homogeneous mass in the mid to lower third esophagus. These tumors show isoattenuating of slight hypoattenuating to muscle at nonenhanced CT and moderate enhancement, occasionally with coarse calcification (Figure 6). On MRI, slightly hyperintense at T2 weighted, slightly hypointense at T1 weighted images, and with moderate homogeneous enhancement without necrosis are shown[14].

Figure 5
Figure 5 A 29-year-old female with leiomyoma. A large exophytic submucosal mass with a sharply defined, smooth filling defect is shown in the distal esophagus.
Figure 6
Figure 6 A 29-year-old female with leiomyoma. Esophageal leiomyoma shows sharply marginated homogeneous mass in the lower third esophagus. These tumors show isoattenuating of slight hypoattenuating to muscle at non-enhanced computed tomography (A), moderate arterial (B) and venous (C) phase enhancement.
GASTRIC DISEASE
Gastric cancer

Most primary gastric cancers are adenocarcinoma. Adenocarcinoma represents over 95% of malignant tumors of the stomach[15]. Common risk factors relating to the development of gastric adenocarcinoma include Helicobacter pylori infection[16], chronic gastritis, pernicious anemia and adenomatous polyps[17]. Gastric primary adenocarcinoma most often occurs in the gastric antrum, followed by the lesser curvature and cardia of the stomach.

Early gastric cancer: Radiologically, early gastric cancer is identified as a superficial lesion that is confined to the gastric mucosa and has not spread to the muscularis propria. It may feature as polypoid, superficial or depressed lesions[18]. The folds entering the center of the lesion are often irregular, nodular or club-shaped, or it may be manifested by a plaque-like elevation[19]. On CT scans, gastric cancer is shown as thickening of the gastric wall (Figure 7). The major benefits of CT scanning in patients with gastric cancer are preoperative staging, treatment planning, prognosis evaluation and recurrence detection.

Figure 7
Figure 7 A 56-year-old female patient with early gastric carcinoma. Computed tomography scans showing thickening wall and narrowing antrum of stomach (A), moderate arterial (B) and venous (C) phase enhancement.

Advanced carcinoma: Advanced gastric carcinomas may be classified as polypoid, ulcerative or infiltrative lesions according to their gross morphological appearance. Imaging feature overlapping may occur in this classification[17]. Polypoid-type tumors usually appear as a large mass lesion. The surface of the lesion may be highly irregular. Large lesions may protrude into the lumen[20]. There may be a distinct angular demarcation or “shelf” at the tumor margins. When the lesion is located in the antrum, the tumor may obstruct the outlet of the stomach. Ulcerated-type carcinoma reveals an irregular ulcer crater. Radiating folds are irregular, converging at the edge of the ulcer crater[20] (Figure 8). Infiltrative lesions display a diffuse, predominantly submucosal infiltrative tumor, with irregular narrowing of the lumen and rigidity of the majority or the whole gastric wall due to the desmoplastic reaction, the so-called linitis plastica[21] (Figure 9).

Figure 8
Figure 8 A 62-year-old male with ulcerated gastric carcinoma: a huge ulcerated mass is seen in the gastric antrum. The margins of the neoplasm’s tissue surrounding the irregular ulcer are also seen.
Figure 9
Figure 9 A 56-year-old male. Diffuse, marked gastric narrowing, with irregular contour and thickened spiculated folds due to primary scirrhous carcinoma.
Gastric lymphoma

In adults, the stomach is the most frequent organ of GI tract lymphomas. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma is more common than Hodgkin’s disease[22]. Much of this tumor spread is submucosal. The invasion of the gastric wall by the lymphoma is with relative flexibility. Findings of enlargement of the spleen and involvement of retrogastric and other regional lymph nodes are suggestive of lymphoma. On barium studies, gastric lymphoma reveals a nodular polypoid mass. The marked sign is thickened gastric folds[23,24]. Its findings may mimic other tumors, such as adenocarcinoma and leiomyosarcoma.

On CT, gastric lymphoma reveals a segmental or diffuse, smooth homogeneous, isoattenuated (minimal enhancement), wall thickening or mass (Figure 10). Lymphoma usually involves more than one site of the stomach. It seldom leads to gastric outlet obstruction, unlike gastric adenocarcinoma, because lymphoma is a “soft” tumor[25]. In contrast, gastric adenocarcinoma usually appears with more focal wall thickening, more enhancement, direct infiltration beyond the gastric wall, mural rigidity and luminal narrowing (linitis plastica), which may result in gastric outlet obstruction[26].

Figure 10
Figure 10 A 60-year-old female patient with mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue in gastric antrum. The tumor reveals as segmental, smooth homogeneous wall thickening on non-contrast computed tomography (A), minimal enhancement on arterial (B) and venous (C) phase enhancement.
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most frequent mesenchymal tumors of the GI tract which arise from the interstitial cells of Cajal. Previously, mesenchymal tumors of the GI tract were classified as leiomyosarcomas or leiomyomas[27,28]. However, more and more evidence has suggested that GISTs are a unique entity and so GISTs were separated from leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas. GISTs are now defined as spindle cell, epithelioid and pleomorphic mesenchymal tumors of the GI tract. GISTs express the KIT protein (CD117, stem cell factor receptor) detected at immunohistochemistry[29-31]. This finding differentiates GISTs from leiomyomas, leiomyosarcomas, schwannomas and neurofibromas which do not express the KIT protein[32]. The prolonged survival of GIST patients and the progress in the recognition of GISTs have made imaging more and more important for diagnosis and monitoring the treatment outcome. CT is the preferred option of imaging modality for these purposes[33]. There are three important factors in determining the malignancy of GISTs: mitotic rate, tumor size and site[34].

On CT, the frequent imaging findings of GISTs are of a round, exophytic, well-circumscribed heterogeneously enhancing tumor appearing as a mass extrinsic to the wall of the stomach (Figure 11). Central fluid attenuation indicative of necrosis is common in larger lesions. Smaller lesions may be homogeneous in density. The liver is the most common site for metastasis[35]. CT may display spreading to the adjacent organ, ascites and omental or peritoneal infiltrate. Associated lymphadenopathy is more infrequent than gastric adenocarcinoma or lymphoma[28].

Figure 11
Figure 11 A 76-year-old female with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Axial plain (A) shows an round, exophytic soft tissue mass, appearing as a dominant mass extrinsic to the wall of the stomach, contrast-enhanced computed tomography arterial (B) and venous phase (C) scan shows slightly enhancing, occasionally with coarse calcification. Liver metastases were shown (D).
SMALL INTESTINAL NEOPLASMS

Primary neoplasms of the small intestine are rare. Primary tumors of the small intestine are less than 2% of primary GI tumors[36,37]. They may occur in association with genetic diseases and chronic intestinal inflammatory disorders. The frequent benign tumors of the small intestine are leiomyoma, lipoma, hamartoma and desmoid tumors. These tumors are usually asymptomatic. The frequent small intestinal primary malignancies are adenocarcinoma, leiomyosarcoma and lymphoma. These tumors may lead to intestinal obstruction, jaundice and bleeding. Extraintestinal tumors may lead to peritoneal metastasis[38].

Malignant neoplasms

Adenocarcinoma of the small intestine is frequent, approximately 30% to 50% of all malignant tumors in the small intestine[39,40]. Proximal duodenum and jejunum is the usual site of primary small intestinal adenocarcinoma, except in the setting of Crohn’s disease[38,41]. Predisposing risk factors include villous adenomas, adenomatous polyps, celiac disease and long-standing Crohn’s disease[42,43]. The most frequent clinical features of small intestinal adenocarcinomas are obstruction, overt or occult GI bleeding, weight loss and jaundice. Enteroclysis is a reliable sensitive diagnostic means for depicting intracavity small intestinal disease[44,45]. The presence of extracavity spread or metastases can be evaluated with CT scan; in some instances, magnetic resonance imaging, EUS or angiography may also be useful[38].

On barium examination, the general radiological appearances are filling defects, annular narrowing, polypoid and/or ulcerated masses, or a combination of these. Infiltrating adenocarcinomas are the most frequent type[46,47]. These are almost revealed as short, sharply demarcated, annular constricting lesions with mucosal disruption. Polypoid-type adenocarcinomas may be displayed as large, irregular, polypoid-filling defects. Ulceration is common in adenocarcinomas. Mixed radiological features such as infiltrating, polypoid and ulcerating lesions indicate an advanced lesion. CT is used for demonstrating the intestine, mesentery, lymph nodes and liver metastases in a single examination and for staging the tumor, as well as follow-up after the treatment.

Lymphoma

Lymphoma is one of the most frequent tumors of the small intestine. Intestinal lymphomas are considered to be primary when the lesion is found in the small intestine and the clinical symptoms are related to intestinal invasion[48]. The majority of small intestine lymphomas are non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (NHL)[49] coming from mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. This tumors are mostly located in the ileum. The lymphoid follicles of the submucosa are the site of origin of lymphoma as these are more numerous in the ileum than in the jejunum[50].

On barium examination, the general radiological signs include luminal narrowing, cavitation, ulceration, valvulae conniventes thickening, discrete intraluminal filling defects and intramural masses[48]. The frequent finding of NHL is the lumen narrowing without intestinal obstruction. A discrete, broad-based mass are characteristic radiological features of lymphomas[48,51]. The valvulae conniventes thickening is a relatively less frequent finding of lymphoma[20]. Focal aneurysmal dilatation is highly suggestive of lymphoma[48].

CT and MRI can reveal the sites and extent of the tumor involvement, such as abdominal lymph nodes and solid viscera, and staging at a single examination. The lymphoma may be displayed as a homogeneous soft tissue mass with only a small intraluminal component. The tumors have only slight or moderate enhancement after the intravenous injection of contrast medium[50].

Leiomyosarcoma

Leiomyosarcoma is the fourth most frequent primary small intestine tumor. It is equally distributed in the jejunum and ileum. Leiomyosarcomas are predominantly extraluminal and eccentric. Acute bleeding is the most common presenting symptom. Necrosis and hemorrhage are also frequent. Occasionally, less frequent signs may be seen: calcification, fistula formations and secondary infection[46,47].

The most common radiological feature is a large irregular exophytic mass with or without ulceration, cavitation or fistula formation[17]. There is marked enhancement of the solid component of the tumor following intravenous contrast medium[52]. Less frequently, leiomyosarcoma may be displayed as a large irregular cavity filled with barium[17].

Benign neoplasms

Leiomyomas are the most common primary benign tumors in the small bowel. The jejunum, ileum and duodenum are the most frequent locations[53]. Leiomyomas are usually single, firm soft tissue masses with well-defined margins. It is reported that there are four different types: intraluminal, intramural, extraluminal and dumbbell shaped[54]. Microscopically, leiomyomas consist of bundles of well-differentiated smooth muscle with no evidence of mitosis. The absence of mitosis is a critical parameter in differentiating it from leiomyosarcoma[38]. Leiomyomas are shown as regular smooth intramural filling defects on barium studies or regular homogenous soft tissue mass on CT scans. There is moderate enhancement of the tumor following intravenous contrast medium.

Adenomas are the most frequent asymptomatic small intestinal benign tumors. Histologically, there are three types: villous, tubular and tubulovillous. Villous with atypia and/or large size increase the risk for malignancy[55]. Because of their potential for malignant transformation, these tumors should be resected or ablated endoscopically[38]. The general radiological findings show adenomas as round smooth intraluminal filling defects on barium examination or smooth well-defined regular soft tissue mass on CT scans and with moderate enhancement after intravenous contrast medium.

COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS
Colorectal carcinoma

Colorectal carcinoma is an extremely common malignancy of the large bowel and in developed countries, it is one of the most frequent causes of death from cancer[56]. Other types of malignant tumors, such as primary lymphoma and leiomyosarcoma are relatively rare[17]. About 69% of carcinomas occur in the colon and only 31% of them are in the rectum and rectosigmoid junction[57,58]. Usually, colorectal carcinomas are not diagnosed until they are relatively advanced.

Barium enema examination has been proven safe and accurate for detecting colorectal tumors. Early carcinoma usually presents as a polypoid lesion. Polyps show as filling defects in the barium column or as soft tissue densities coated with barium within the air-filled lumen. Larger polypoid lesions generally reveal an irregular and/or ulcerated mucosal surface[17,59] (Figure 12). A flat ulcerating type of carcinoma is more frequent in the transverse and descending colon[60]. Infiltrating type of carcinoma is featured by thickened bowel wall due to infiltrated submucosal and muscular layers[61].

Figure 12
Figure 12 A 59-year-old female patient with sigmoid carcinoma. An annular stenosis of the sigmoid colon, with an irregular mucosal surface with contour deformity.

CT can be used for assessing the extension areas of the tumor, such as locoregional spreading and distant metastases[62]. On CT scanning, the polypoid type reveals a bulky mass with lobulated margins. An infiltrating type appears with an eccentric or concentric thickening wall. The density of the lesion increases markedly after injection of contrast medium[62] (Figure 13). CT may be used in assessing the extramural spread of tumor when extraintestinal infiltration is diagnosed in the presence of irregularity and dense stripes in the peri-intestinal adipose tissue. CT may also be used in assessment of the extension of any locoregional spread and distant metastases, such as spreading to the adjacent or distant organs (bladder, vagina and abdominal and pelvic muscles). The liver is the most commonly infiltrated organ by metastases from colorectal cancer and CT has more than 90% sensitivity in diagnosing lesions larger than 1 cm[63,64]. Complications of colorectal carcinoma include obstruction, perforation, pericolic abscess, ischemic colitis and intussusception.

Figure 13
Figure 13 Sigmoid colon cancer in a 59-year-old female. Contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography scan shows luminal narrowing and marked wall thickening. There is adjacent stranding of the serosa and mesenteric fat, a small lymph node anterior to the irregular thickening wall.
Lymphoma

Other malignances that invade the colon are rare. Primary lymphomas of the colon often involve the cecum and rectum and are non-Hodgkin in type. The tumors may appear as localized, large, extraluminal masses or constricting. Diffuse infiltration is the most frequent form of colonic lymphoma and is featured by nodules with intact mucosal surface and diffuse or segmental distribution[17,23,24]. The local complications of lymphoma include perforation, pneumatosis coli and intussusception.

Polyps

A “polyp” is a raised mucosal lesion. This term does not imply any histological features. Metaplastic polyps are relatively more common in the rectum and less common in the colon. These have no malignant potential. Most adenomas are polyps. Adenomas are well-defined circumscribed areas of dysplastic epithelium. The overall pattern of the epithelium and stroma may be classified as tubular, villous or mixed. The significance of adenoma is its malignant potential. The imaging features created by a polyp depend on the angle at which it is viewed and its relationship to the barium pool. Several signs are described on the radiological features: (1) meniscus sign: en face view showing a clearly defined inner and outer margin of the meniscus; (2) increased density sign: on barium enema, polyps are intraluminal lesions coated with barium. The incident X-ray beam may pass through four layers of barium. These factors may increase the density. A localized area of “increased density” may also be drawn; and (3) filling defect: a polyp on the dependent wall creates a “shadow” (low density area) in the barium pool. This feature is helpful in differentiating that the lesion is intraluminal. If the polyp is on the non-dependent wall, it may be hidden by the dense barium pool. To confirm the relationship between the lesions and the intestinal wall, it is helpful to turn the patients from side to side with the table flat and view the lesions at different angles.

In general, the radiological features of a polyp may be noted as six “S’s”: its site, size, shape (regular/irregular), surface texture (smooth, lobulated, very nodular), symmetry of the base (smooth/irregular, indrawn) and singularly or otherwise[65]. Although polyposis syndrome is generally rare, it plays important roles in relation to cancer prevention, screening and genetic counseling.

CONCLUSION

Conventional radiographs can provide valuable information on detection, characterization, staging and prediction of treatment response of GI malignancies. However, barium imaging has some limited roles in staging GI tract tumors. Tumors spreading to adjacent GI segments and accompanying complications may not be disclosed by barium imaging. Cross-sectional imaging may provide more accurate details of the adjacent organ invasion, omental or peritoneal spread.

Footnotes

P- Reviewer: Chiu KW, Tsushima Y, Verma S S- Editor: Song XX L- Editor: Roemmele A E- Editor: Liu SQ

References
1.  Hoeffel C, Mulé S, Romaniuk B, Ladam-Marcus V, Bouché O, Marcus C. Advances in radiological imaging of gastrointestinal tumors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2009;69:153-167.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Lewis RB, Mehrotra AK, Rodriguez P, Levine MS. From the radiologic pathology archives: esophageal neoplasms: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2013;33:1083-1108.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
3.  Glickman JN. Section II: pathology and pathologic staging of esophageal cancer. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;15:167-179.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Levine MS, Laufer I, Yamada A.  Tumors of the esophagus. In Laufer I, Levine MS (eds). Double contrast radiology of the gastrointestinal tract. 157-190.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Meyers MA Carcinoma of the esophagus: Imaging, staging and management. In Meyers MA (ed). Neoplasms of the digestive tract: imaging, staging and management. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven 1998; 9-19.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Trivers KF, Sabatino SA, Stewart SL. Trends in esophageal cancer incidence by histology, United States, 1998-2003. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:1422-1428.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 142]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 157]  [Article Influence: 9.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Bosch A, Frias Z, Caldwell WL. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Cancer. 1979;43:1557-1561.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Riddell AM, Hillier J, Brown G, King DM, Wotherspoon AC, Thompson JN, Cunningham D, Allum WH. Potential of surface-coil MRI for staging of esophageal cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:1280-1287.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Takashima S, Takeuchi N, Shiozaki H, Kobayashi K, Morimoto S, Ikezoe J, Tomiyama N, Harada K, Shogen K, Kozuka T. Carcinoma of the esophagus: CT vs MR imaging in determining resectability. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;156:297-302.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Bruzzi JF, Munden RF, Truong MT, Marom EM, Sabloff BS, Gladish GW, Iyer RB, Pan TS, Macapinlac HA, Erasmus JJ. PET/CT of esophageal cancer: its role in clinical management. Radiographics. 2007;27:1635-1652.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Levine MS, Buck JL, Pantongrag-Brown L, Buetow PC, Hallman JR, Sobin LH. Leiomyosarcoma of the esophagus: radiographic findings in 10 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:27-32.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Rice TW. Benign esophageal tumors: esophagoscopy and endoscopic esophageal ultrasound. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;15:20-26.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Levine MS. Benign tumors of the esophagus: radiologic evaluation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;15:9-19.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Yang PS, Lee KS, Lee SJ, Kim TS, Choo IW, Shim YM, Kim K, Kim Y. Esophageal leiomyoma: radiologic findings in 12 patients. Korean J Radiol. 2001;2:132-137.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Fishman EK, Urban BA, Hruban RH. CT of the stomach: spectrum of disease. Radiographics. 1996;16:1035-1054.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Parsonnet J, Friedman GD, Vandersteen DP, Chang Y, Vogelman JH, Orentreich N, Sibley RK. Helicobacter pylori infection and the risk of gastric carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1127-1131.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Gourtsoyiannis N, Grammatikakis J, Prassopoulos P. Role of conventional radiology in the diagnosis and staging of gastrointestinal tract neoplasms. Semin Surg Oncol. 2001;20:91-108.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Farley DR, Donohue JH. Early gastric cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 1992;72:401-421.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  White RM, Levine MS, Enterline HT, Laufer I. Early gastric cancer. Recent experience. Radiology. 1985;155:25-27.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Levine MS, Megibow AJ.  Carcinoma. In Gore RM, Levine MS, Laufer I (eds). Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1994; 660-683.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  Levine MS, Kong V, Rubesin SE, Laufer I, Herlinger H. Scirrhous carcinoma of the stomach: radiologic and endoscopic diagnosis. Radiology. 1990;175:151-154.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Papadimitriou CS, Papacharalampous NX, Kittas C. Primary gastrointestinal malignant lymphomas. A morphologic and immunohistochemical study. Cancer. 1985;55:870-879.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Dodd GD. Lymphoma of the hollow abdominal viscera. Radiol Clin North Am. 1990;28:771-783.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Zornoza J, Dodd GD. Lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract. Semin Roentgenol. 1980;15:272-287.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Horton KM, Fishman EK. Current role of CT in imaging of the stomach. Radiographics. 2003;23:75-87.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
26.  Gollub MJ. Imaging of gastrointestinal lymphoma. Radiol Clin North Am. 2008;46:287-312, ix.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Clark RA, Alexander ES. Computed tomography of gastrointestinal leiomyosarcoma. Gastrointest Radiol. 1982;7:127-129.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Pannu HK, Hruban RH, Fishman EK. CT of gastric leiomyosarcoma: patterns of involvement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:369-373.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors--definition, clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features and differential diagnosis. Virchows Arch. 2001;438:1-12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Kindblom LG, Remotti HE, Aldenborg F, Meis-Kindblom JM. Gastrointestinal pacemaker cell tumor (GIPACT): gastrointestinal stromal tumors show phenotypic characteristics of the interstitial cells of Cajal. Am J Pathol. 1998;152:1259-1269.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
31.  Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, Gorstein F, Lasota J, Longley BJ, Miettinen M, O’Leary TJ, Remotti H, Rubin BP. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 2002;33:459-465.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
32.  Hersh MR, Choi J, Garrett C, Clark R. Imaging gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Control. 2005;12:111-115.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Bano S, Puri SK, Upreti L, Chaudhary V, Sant HK, Gondal R. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): an imaging perspective. Jpn J Radiol. 2012;30:105-115.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Miettinen M, El-Rifai W, H L Sobin L, Lasota J. Evaluation of malignancy and prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a review. Hum Pathol. 2002;33:478-483.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
35.  Burkill GJ, Badran M, Al-Muderis O, Meirion Thomas J, Judson IR, Fisher C, Moskovic EC. Malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor: distribution, imaging features, and pattern of metastatic spread. Radiology. 2003;226:527-532.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
36.  Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 1998. CA Cancer J Clin. 1998;48:6-29.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
37.  Barclay TH, Schapira DV. Malignant tumors of the small intestine. Cancer. 1983;51:878-881.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
38.  Gill SS, Heuman DM, Mihas AA. Small intestinal neoplasms. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;33:267-282.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
39.  Brücher BL, Roder JD, Fink U, Stein HJ, Busch R, Siewert JR. Prognostic factors in resected primary small bowel tumors. Dig Surg. 1998;15:42-51.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
40.  Ojha A, Zacherl J, Scheuba C, Jakesz R, Wenzl E. Primary small bowel malignancies: single-center results of three decades. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;30:289-293.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
41.  Miller TL, Skucas J, Gudex D, Listinsky C. Bowel cancer characteristics in patients with regional enteritis. Gastrointest Radiol. 1987;12:45-52.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
42.  Swinson CM, Slavin G, Coles EC, Booth CC. Coeliac disease and malignancy. Lancet. 1983;1:111-115.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
43.  Collier PE, Turowski P, Diamond DL. Small intestinal adenocarcinoma complicating regional enteritis. Cancer. 1985;55:516-521.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
44.  Maglinte DD, Kelvin FM, O’Connor K, Lappas JC, Chernish SM. Current status of small bowel radiography. Abdom Imaging. 1996;21:247-257.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
45.  Bessette JR, Maglinte DD, Kelvin FM, Chernish SM. Primary malignant tumors in the small bowel: a comparison of the small-bowel enema and conventional follow-through examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153:741-744.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
46.  Gourtsoyiannis NC, Nolan DJ.  Primary malignant neoplasms: “Imaging of small intestinal tumours”. Amsterdam: Elsevier 1997; 105-189.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
47.  Gourtsoyiannis N, Makó E. Imaging of primary small intestinal tumours by enteroclysis and CT with pathological correlation. Eur Radiol. 1997;7:625-642.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
48.  Gourtsoyiannis NC, Nolan DJ. Lymphoma of the small intestine: radiological appearances. Clin Radiol. 1988;39:639-645.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
49.  Lewin KJ, Ranchod M, Dorfman RF. Lymphomas of the gastrointestinal tract: a study of 117 cases presenting with gastrointestinal disease. Cancer. 1978;42:693-707.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
50.  Grainger RG, Allison DJ, Baert A.  Diagnostic radiology: A text book of medical imaging: Third edition, Volume two. 995-996.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
51.  Sartoris DJ, Harell GS, Anderson MF, Zboralske FF. Small-bowel lymphoma and regional enteritis: radiographic similarities. Radiology. 1984;152:291-296.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
52.  Grainger RG, Allison DJ, Baert A.  Diagnostic radiology: A text book of medical imaging: 3rd ed. Volume two. .  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
53.  Blanchard DK, Budde JM, Hatch GF, Wertheimer-Hatch L, Hatch KF, Davis GB, Foster RS, Skandalakis JE. Tumors of the small intestine. World J Surg. 2000;24:421-429.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
54.  Starr GF, Dockerty MB. Leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas of the small intestine. Cancer. 1955;8:101-111.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
55.  Bjork KJ, Davis CJ, Nagorney DM, Mucha P. Duodenal villous tumors. Arch Surg. 1990;125:961-965.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
56.  Padhani AR. Advances in imaging of colorectal cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1999;30:189-199.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
57.  Coates RJ, Greenberg RS, Liu MT, Correa P, Harlan LC, Reynolds P, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Haynes MA, Hankey BF, Hunter CP. Anatomic site distribution of colon cancer by race and other colon cancer risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:42-50.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
58.  Devesa SS, Chow WH. Variation in colorectal cancer incidence in the United States by subsite of origin. Cancer. 1993;71:3819-3826.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
59.  Laufer I Double contrast enema: technical aspects. In Laufer I, Levine MS (eds). Double contrast gastrointestinal radiology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1992; 423-445.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
60.  Boland CR Malignant tumors of the colon. In Yamada T (ed). Textbook of gastroenterology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven 1995; 1967-2026.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
61.  Kelvin FM Diagnosis of colorectal cancer by conventional radiology. In Meyers MA (ed). Neoplasms of the digestive tract: imaging, staging and management. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven 1998; 219-235.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
62.  Angelelli G, Ianora AA, Scardapane A, Pedote P, Memeo M, Rotondo A. Role of computerized tomography in the staging of gastrointestinal neoplasms. Semin Surg Oncol. 2001;20:109-121.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
63.  Leen E, Angerson WJ, Wotherspoon H, Moule B, Cook TG, McArdle CS. Detection of colorectal liver metastases: comparison of laparotomy, CT, US, and Doppler perfusion index and evaluation of postoperative follow-up results. Radiology. 1995;195:113-116.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
64.  Horton KM, Abrams RA, Fishman EK. Spiral CT of colon cancer: imaging features and role in management. Radiographics. 2000;20:419-430.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
65.  Grainger RG, Allison DJ, Baert A.  Diagnostic radiology: A text book of medical imaging: 3rd ed. Volume two. 1016-1021.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]