Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Radiol. Dec 28, 2023; 15(12): 359-369
Published online Dec 28, 2023. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v15.i12.359
Published online Dec 28, 2023. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v15.i12.359
Figure 1 Artificial intelligence segmentation by models with skipped slice training.
A-C: Artificial intelligence (AI) segmented lesion by model trained without skipping slices (A), with skipping 1 slice (B), and with skipping 2 slices (C). There is slight difference in the segmentation, but insufficient to modify the Dice coefficient. The cancer is in the descending colon, only a small portion of which was segmented by AI model. The slightly larger false positive lesion may be due to slightly different slice level.
Figure 2 Examples of lesion agreement by 1- and 2-voter ensemble technique.
A and B: 1- (A) and 2- (B) voter(s) model agreeing on the same tumor mass, although 2-voters mark less of the mass.
Figure 3 Example of lesion disagreement by 1- and 2-voter ensemble technique.
A and B: 1- (A) voter model marks a false positive in the liver which is rejected by 2- (B) voter model.
- Citation: Grudza M, Salinel B, Zeien S, Murphy M, Adkins J, Jensen CT, Bay C, Kodibagkar V, Koo P, Dragovich T, Choti MA, Kundranda M, Syeda-Mahmood T, Wang HZ, Chang J. Methods for improving colorectal cancer annotation efficiency for artificial intelligence-observer training. World J Radiol 2023; 15(12): 359-369
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v15/i12/359.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v15.i12.359