Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Sep 26, 2017; 9(9): 737-741
Published online Sep 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i9.737
Published online Sep 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i9.737
Studies | n. pts | Spont. type 1 ECG | Drug-I type 1 ECG | Fam. SCD | Syncope | Asympt. | +EPS/EPS performed |
Sacher et al[8] | 202 | 61% (124) | 49% (78) | 42% (85) | 35% (70) | 65% (132) | 82% (153/187) |
Kamakura et al[9] | 70 | 66% (44) | 34% (26) | 23% (16) | 46% (32) | 54% (38) | 87% (58/67) |
Sarkozy et al[10] | 47 | 62% (29) | 38% (18) | 55% (26) | 55% (26) | 45% (21) | 83% (38/46) |
Delise et al[11] | 110 | 74% (82) | 26% (28) | 38% (42) | 58% (64) | 42% | 85% (90/106) |
Priori et al[12] | 137 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 72% (98/137) |
Total | 566 | 65% (279/429) | 35% (150/429) | 39% (169/429) | 45% (192/429) | 65% (237/429) | 80% (437/543) |
- Citation: Delise P, Allocca G, Sitta N. Brugada type 1 electrocardiogram: Should we treat the electrocardiogram or the patient? World J Cardiol 2017; 9(9): 737-741
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v9/i9/737.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i9.737