Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Mar 26, 2017; 9(3): 212-229
Published online Mar 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i3.212
Published online Mar 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i3.212
Absolute contraindications |
Absence of heart team or surgery on the site |
Estimated life expectancy < 1 yr |
Improvement of quality of life by TAVI unlikely because of comorbidities |
Severe primary associated disease of other valves with major contribution to the patient’s symptoms, that can be treated only by surgery |
Inadequate annulus size (< 18 mm, > 29 mm) |
Thrombus in the left ventricle |
Active endocarditis |
Elevated risk of coronary ostium obstruction (asymmetric valve calcification, short distance between annulus and coronary ostium, small aortic sinuses) |
Plaques with mobile thrombi in the ascending aorta, or arch |
For transfemoral/subclavian approach: inadequate vascular access (vessel size, calcification, tortuosity) |
Relative contraindications |
Bicuspid or non-calcified valves |
Untreated coronary artery disease requiring revascularization |
Haemodynamic instability |
LVEF < 20% |
For transapical approach: severe pulmonary disease, LV apex not accessible |
Three-plane localizer | To localize aortic valve plane |
Axial SSFP non ECG gated without contrast | To identify potential ascending aorta and subclavian access sites |
To determinae size, calcification, and presence of aneurysmal dilatation of aorta | |
Breath held free breathing 2D ECG gated SSFP | To evaluate aortic annulus,aortic valve structure, and sinus higher |
Coronal aorta, LVOT and aortic root | Planimetry valve orifice area |
SSFP ECG gated images:short axis stak | To calculate ejection fraction, ventricular volumes and mass |
Breath held free breathing phase contrast at aortic orifice | Calculate blood flow velocity, pressure gradient, and flow volume across the aortic valve |
Calculate Aortic regurgitant volume | |
3D Navigator assisted SSFP | Coronary ostia height |
Aortic diameter | |
T2 black blood | Useful in presence of susceptibility artifacts from sternal wires of prosthetic valves |
Technique | Principal advantages | Disadvantages |
Transthoracic echocardiography | Widespread availability First line diagnostic tool | Poor acoustic window Frequent discrepancy between different parameters |
Transesophageal echocardiography | Good spatial resolution | Suboptimal for distal ascending aorta and arch |
3 D reconstruction | Semi-invasive exam | Anatomic definition and annulus measurement |
Multislice computed tomography | Multiplanar reconstruction Quantification of calcium score Evaluation of aorto-femoral tract | Potential nephrotoxicity of contrast medium Radiations exposition Controlled heart rate |
Magnetic resonance imaging | Tissue characterization Multiplanar reconstruction Evaluation of aorto-femoral tract Controlled heart rate | Reduced availability Poor evaluation of calcifications Contraindicated in metallic devices wearers |
Positron emission tomography | Evaluation of calcification and inflammation | Poor spatial resolution |
- Citation: Cocchia R, D’Andrea A, Conte M, Cavallaro M, Riegler L, Citro R, Sirignano C, Imbriaco M, Cappelli M, Gregorio G, Calabrò R, Bossone E. Patient selection for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A combined clinical and multimodality imaging approach. World J Cardiol 2017; 9(3): 212-229
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v9/i3/212.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i3.212