Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Feb 26, 2017; 9(2): 167-173
Published online Feb 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i2.167
Table 1 Baseline characteristics
AllEffective SMTIneffective SMTP-value
Number, n (%)618596 (96.3)22 (3.7)
Sex
Male, n47045218
Female, n1481444
Age (years)
Mean (± SD)66.4 (± 11)66.7 (± 10.6)54.6 (± 16.5)P = 0.0003
Median (IQR)69 (60-74)69 (62-74)54 (41-69)
LVEF (%)
Mean (± SD)31 (± 12.4)31 (± 12.5)26.9 (± 9.0)P = n.s.
Median (IQR)30 (22-35)30 (23-35)30 (20-35)
LVEF > 30%, n (%)248 (40.1)240 (36.9)8 (3.2)
LVEF < 30%, n (%)370 (59.9)356 (56.1)14 (3.8)P = n.s. (> 30% vs < 30%)
LVEF > 20%, n (%)334 (54.0)320 (49.8)14 (4.2)
LVEF < 20%, n (%)284 (46)276 (43.2)8 (2.8)P = n.s. (> 20% vs < 20%)
BMI (kg/m2)
Mean (± SD)28.4 (± 4.7)28 (± 4.7)29 (± 4.0)P = n.s.
Median (IQR)28 (17-28)28 (25-31)29 (25.5-33)
Indikation
Primary prevention, n (%)468 (76)452 (72.6)16 (3.4)
Secundary prevention, n (%)150 (24)144 (20)6 (4.0)P = n.s. (pp vs sp)
Type of arrhythmia for secondary prevention, n (%)
Sustained VT108 (72)106 (70.1)2 (1.9)
VF42 (28)38 (18.1)4 (9.5)P = 0.05 (VT vs VF)
SMT-Energy (J)
Mean (± SD)21 (± 2.3)20.8 (± 2.3)30.9 (± 2.0)
Median (IQR)20 (20-22)20 (20-20)30 (30-30)
Diagnosis
Non CAD, n (%)270254 (94.1)16 (5.9)
DCM (myocarditis), n (%)232 (85)218 (79)14 (6.0)
Other CM (non myocarditis), n (%)38 (15)36 (9.8)2 (5.2)
CAD, n (%)348342 (98.3)6 (1.7)P = 0.007 (nonCAD vs CAD)
Complete revascularized, n (%)196 (56)192 (54)4 (2.0)
Not complete revascularized, n (%)152 (44)150 (42.7)2 (1.3)P = n.s. (complete vs in-complete revascularized)
One vessel disease124 (81.6)122 (80.0)2 (1.6)
> One vessel disease28 (18.4)28 (18.4)0 (0)P = n.s. (one vesel vs > one)
Stenosed100 (65.8)100 (65.8)0 (0)
Occluded52 (34.2)50 (30.4)2 (3.8)P = n.s. (stenosed vs occluded)
Medication
Amiodaron medication, n (%)124 (20)118 (15.2)6 (4.8)
No amiodaron, n (%)494 (80)478 (76.8)16 (3.2)P = n.s. (amio vs no amio)
Table 2 Characteristics of patients with failed intra-operative safety margin test
nAge at time of implantation (years)Sex (m/f)Indication for ICD implantationLVEF (%)Primary vs secondary ICD indicationFurther management after failed initial SMT
146mLAD stenosed30ppSubcutaneous array
245woCM15ppPDT OK
374woCM36ppSubcutaneous array
441mcmpl revasc39ppSubcutaneous array
554wDCM10ppSubcutaneous array
625moCM20spSubcutaneous array
768mDCM35spSubcutaneous array
869mRCA occluded31spPDT OK
973moCM30ppPDT OK
1037mTGV surgery30ppSubcutaneous array
1169mDCM20ppnone
1246mLAD stenosed30ppSubcutaneous array
1345wDCM15ppPDT OK
1474wDCM36ppSubcutaneous array
1541mcmpl revasc39ppSubcutaneous array
1654wDCM10ppSubcutaneous array
1725mDCM20spSubcutaneous array
1868mDCM35spSubcutaneous array
1969mRCA occluded31spPDT OK
2073mDCM30ppPDT OK
2137mvs D surgery30ppSubcutaneous array
2269mDCM20ppNone
Table 3 Follow up
AllEffective SMTIneffective SMTP-value
FU, n (%)552 (89.3)530 (96)22 (100)
FU duration (mo)Mean (± SD)21.1 (± 21)21.5 (± 21)15.8 (± 21)P = n.s.
Antiarrhythmica, n (%)
Amiodarone122 (23.0)6 (27)P = n.s.
Sotalex2 (0.4)0 (0)P = n.s.
β-blocker485 (91.5)20 (91)P = n.s.
Events during FU, n (%)124 (23.4)2 (9.1)P = 0.02
Inadequate therapy4 (0.8)2 (9.1)P = n.s.
ATP58 (10.9)0 (0)
Shock delivery36 (6.8)0 (0)
ATP and shock delivery20 (3.8)0 (0)
VT ablation6 (1.1)0 (0)