Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Cardiol. May 26, 2015; 7(5): 243-276
Published online May 26, 2015. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i5.243
Published online May 26, 2015. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i5.243
Table 1 Causes of troponin elevation
System | Causes of troponin elevation |
Cardiovascular | Acute aortic dissection |
Arrhythmia | |
Medical ICU patients | |
Hypotension | |
Heart failure | |
Apical ballooning syndrome | |
Cardiac inflammation | |
Endocarditis, myocarditis, pericarditis | |
Hypertension | |
Infiltrative disease | |
Amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, hemochromatosis, scleroderma | |
Left ventricular hypertrophy | |
Myocardial injury | Blunt chest trauma |
Cardiac surgeries | |
Cardiac procedures | |
Ablation, cardioversion, percutaneous intervention | |
Chemotherapy | |
Hypersensitivity drug reactions | |
Envenomation | |
Respiratory | Acute PE |
ARDS | |
Infectious/immune | Sepsis/SIRS |
Viral illness | |
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura | |
Gastrointestinal | Severe GI bleeding |
Nervous system | Acute stroke |
Ischemic stroke | |
Hemorrhagic stroke | |
Head trauma | |
Renal | Chronic kidney disease |
Endocrine | Diabetes |
Hypothyroidism | |
Musculoskeletal | Rhabdomyolysis |
Integumentary | Extensive skin burns |
Inherited | Neurofibromatosis |
Duchenne muscular dystrophy | |
Klippel-Feil syndrome | |
Others | Endurance exercise |
Environmental exposure | |
Carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulfide |
Table 2 Electrocardiogram manifestations of acute myocardial ischemia (in absence of left ventricular hypertrophy and left bundle branch block)
ST elevation |
New ST elevation at the J point in two contiguous leads with the cut-points: |
≥ 0.1 mV in all leads other than leads V2–V3 where the following cut points apply: ≥ 0.2 mV in men ≥ 40 yr; ≥ 0.25 mV in men < 40 yr, or ≥ 0.15 mV in women |
ST depression and T wave changes |
New horizontal or down-sloping ST depression ≥ 0.05 mV in two contiguous |
leads and/or T inversion ≥ 0.1 mV in two contiguous leads with prominent R wave or R/S ratio > 1 |
Table 3 Third universal classification of myocardial infarction
Type 1: Spontaneous MI |
Spontaneous MI due to atherosclerotic plaque rupture, ulceration, fissuring, erosion, or dissection with resulting intraluminal thrombus in one or more of the coronary arteries leading to decreased myocardial blood flow or distal platelet emboli with ensuing myocyte necrosis. The patient may have underlying severe CAD, non-obstructive coronary disease or no CAD |
Type 2: MI secondary to an ischemic imbalance |
Myocardial injury with necrosis occurs due to conditions other than CAD that contribute to an imbalance between myocardial oxygen supply and/or demand such as coronary endothelial dysfunction, coronary artery spasm, coronary embolism, tachycardia-bradycardia arrhythmias, anemia, respiratory failure, hypotension, and hypertension |
Type 3: MI resulting in death when biomarker values are unavailable |
Cardiac death with symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia and presumed new ischemic ECG changes or new LBBB, but death occurs before blood samples can be obtained, before cardiac troponins biomarkers rise, or when cardiac biomarkers were not collected |
Type 4A: MI related to percutaneous coronary intervention |
MI associated with PCI is defined by elevation of cTn values greater than five times the 99th percentile upper normal reference limit (URL) in patients with normal baseline values (< 99th percentile URL) or a rise of cTn values by > 20% if the baseline troponins are elevated and are stable or falling. In addition one of the following criterion are required: (1) symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia; (2) new ischemic ECG changes or new LBBB; (3) angiographic loss of patency of a major coronary artery or a side branch or persistent slow- or no coronary flow or coronary embolization; or (4) demonstration with imaging of a new loss of viable myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality |
Type 4B: MI related to stent thrombosis |
MI associated with stent thrombosis detected by coronary angiography or autopsy in the presence of myocardial ischemia with a rise and/or fall of troponin biomarkers. One troponin measurement should be above the 99th percentile UR |
Type 4C: MI related to restenosis |
MI associated with restenosis defined as ≥ 50% stenosis or a complex lesion demonstrated at coronary angiography after (1) initial successful stent deployment; or (2) dilatation of a coronary artery stenosis with balloon angioplasty. These coronary angiographic changes should be associated with an increase and/or decrease of cTn values > 99th percentile URL and no other significant obstructive CAD |
Type 5: MI related to coronary artery bypass grafting |
MI associated with CABG is defined by elevation of cardiac troponins greater than ten times the 99th percentile URL in patients with normal baseline cTn values (< 99th percentile URL). In addition, one of the following should be present: (1) new pathological Q waves or new LBBB; or (2) angiographic documented new graft or new native coronary artery occlusion; or (3) new loss of viable myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality as shown by an imaging modality |
Table 4 Proposed definition of clinically relevant myocardial infarction after both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting procedures
In patients with normal baseline CK-MB | The peak CK-MB measured within 48 h of the procedure rises to ≥ 10 × the local laboratory ULN, or to ≥ 5 × ULN with new pathologic Q-waves in ≥ 2 contiguous leads or new persistent LBBB, OR in the absence of CK-MB measurements and a normal baseline cTn, a cTn (I or T) level measured within 48 h of the PCI rises to ≥ 70 × the local laboratory ULN, or ≥ 35 × ULN with new pathologic Q-waves in ≥ 2 contiguous leads or new persistent LBBB |
In patients with elevated baseline CK-MB (or cTn) in whom the biomarker levels are stable or falling | The CK-MB (or cTn) rises by an absolute increment equal to those levels recommended above from the most recent pre-procedure level |
In patients with elevated CK-MB (or cTn) in whom the biomarker levels have not been shown to be stable or falling | The CK-MB (or cTn) rises by an absolute increment equal to those levels recommended above plus new ST-segment elevation or depression plus signs consistent with a clinically relevant MI, such as new onset or worsening heart failure or sustained hypotension |
Table 5 Bone marrow and circulating progenitor cells in coronary artery disease patients
Ref. | n | Randomize | Timepost PCI and/or MI | Cell dose | Injection route | Baseline LVEF | LVEFchange | Duration | Other findings |
Assmus et al[215] | 92 | Yes | 2348-2470 d | 22 ± 106 CPC 205 ± 110 × 106 BMC | IC | CPC 39% ± 10% BMC: 41% ± 11% | CPC -0.4% BMC 2.90% | 3 mo | Pts with previous MI; ↑ LVEF in BMC but not CPC |
Bartunek et al[216] | 35 | Cohort | 10 d | 12.6 ± 2.2 × 106 | IC | 45% ± 2.5% | 7% | 4 mo | ↑ LV regional function, perfusion; restenosis ↑ |
Chen et al[217] | 69 | Yes | 18.4 ± 0.5 d | 8-10 × 109 | IC | 49% ± 9% | 18% | 6 mo | ↑ LVEF by ventriculogram ↑ perfusion; ↓ ESV |
Erbs et al[218] | 26 | Yes | 225 ± 87 d | 69 ± 14 × 106 | IC | 51.7% ± 3.7% | 7.20% | 3 mo | Pts with chronic CAD occlusion Rxed with CPC; ↓ EF by MRI; infarct size 16% |
Ge et al[219] | 20 | Yes | 1 d | 39 ± 22 × 106 | IC | 53.8% ± 9.2% | 4.80% | 6 mo | ↑ Perfusion by SPECT |
Hendrikx et al[220] | 20 | Yes | 217 ± 162 d | 60 ± 31 × 106 IM | IM | 42.9% ± 10.3% | 5% | 4 mo | CABG in Pts with previous CAD ↑ Regional but not global LV function; 6/9 with induced ventricular tachycardia |
Janssens et al [221] | 67 | Yes | 1 d | 172 × 106 | IC | 48.5 ± 7.2 | 3.30% | 4 mo | ↓ Infarct size |
Kang et al[222] | 96 | Yes | < 14 d AMI; > 14 d OMI | 1-2 × 109 | IC | 52.0 ± 9.9 | 5.10% AMI | 6 mo | G-CSF for 3 d; ↓ ESV and infarct size in AMI; = EF, ESV and infarct size in OMI |
Katritsis et al[223] | 22 | Cohort | 224 ± 464 d | 2-4 × 106 | IC | 39.7% ± 9.3% | 1.60% | 4 mo | ↑ Regional but not global LV function |
Lunde et al[224,225] | 100 | Yes | 6 ± 1.3 d | 68 × 106 (median) 54-130 × 106 | IC | 41.3 ± 11.0 | = | 6-12 mo | ↑ LVEF in treated and controls; = EDV and infarct size |
Meyer et al[226] | 60 | Yes | 4.8 ± 1.3 | 24.6 ± 9.4 × 108 | IC | 50 ± 10 | 5.90% | 18 ± 6 mo | ↑ LVEF by MRI significant at 6 but not 18 mo |
Mocini et al[227] | 36 | Cohort | AMI < 6 mo | 292 ± 232 × 106 IM | IM | 46% ± 6% | 5% | 3-12 mo | CABG in all; troponin increased |
Perin et al[228] | 20 | Cohort | ICM | 25.5 ± 6.3 × 106 | IM Trans-Endo-cardial | 30% ± 6% | 5.10% | 12 mo | LVEF = Controls; ↑ LV perfusion ↑ Exercise |
Ruan et al[229] | 20 | Yes | Approximately 1 d | NR | IC | 53.5% ± 5.8% | 5.80% | 6 mo | ↑ LV segmental contraction |
Schächinger et al[230,231] | 204 | Yes | 3-8 d | 2.4 × 108 | IC | 48.3% ± 9.2% | 6%-7% | 4-12 mo | ↑ EF when Rx > 4 d post MI and when EF ↑ ≤ 48.9; LV perfusion |
Strauer et al[232] | 20 | Cohort | 5-9 d | 2.8 ± 2.2 × 107 IM | IC | 57% ± 8% | 5% | 3 mo | ↑ Regional but not global LVEF; ↓ ESV and ↓ Infarct size |
Li et al[234] | 70 | Yes | 7 ± 5 d | 7.3 ± 7.3 × 107 | IC | 50% ± 8.2% | 7% | 6 mo | G-CSF for 5 d; ↓ LV ESV, ↓ LV wall motion score |
Table 6 Stem cells in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction
Ref. | n | Random-ized | Timepost MI | Cell dose | Baseline | LVEF | Duration | Other findings |
Strauer et al[232] | 20 | Cohort | 8 d | 2.8 ± 2.2 × 107 | 57% ± 8% | 5% | 3 mo | ↑ Regional but not global LVEF ↓ LV ESV and infarct size |
Bartunek et al[216] | 35 | Cohort | 10 d | 12.6 ± 2.2 × 106 | 45% ± 2.5% | 7% | 4 mo | ↑ LV regional function, ↑ perfusion; ↑↑ restenosis |
Li et al[234] | 70 | Yes | 6 d | 7.3 ± 7.3 × 107 | 50 ± 8.2 | 7% | 6 mo | ↓ LV ESV, LV wall motion score |
Janssens et al[221] | 67 | Yes | 1 d | 172 × 106 | 48.5 ± 7.2 | 3.30% | 4 mo | ↓ Infarct size |
Meyer et al[226] and Wollert et al[237] | 60 | Yes | 4.8 d | 24.6 × 108 | 50.0 ± 10.0 | = | 6-18 mo | ↑ LVEF at 6 but not at 18 mo |
Kang et al[222] | 96 | Yes | 4 d | 1-2 × 109 | 52.0 ± 9.9 | 5.1% AMI | 6 mo | ↓ LV ESV and infarction in acute MI; = ESV and = old MI |
Lunde et al[224,225] | 100 | Yes | 6 d | 68 × 106 | 41.3 ± 11.0 | = | 6-12 mo | LVEF ↑ in treated and controls; = EDV and infarct size |
Ge et al[219] | 20 | Yes | 1 d | 4 × 107 | 53.8 ± 9.2 | 4.80% | 6 mo | ↑ LV regional wall perfusion by SPECT |
Meluzín et al[235,236] | 66 | Yes | 5-9 d | 107-108 | 42 ± 0.0 | 3-5 | 3-12 mo | ↑ LVEF 3% @107↑ LVEF 5%-7% @ 108 3-12 mo |
Schächinger et al[230,231] | 204 | Yes | 3-8 d | 2.4 × 108 | 48.3 ± 9.2 | 6-7 | 4-12 mo | ↑ EF when Rx > 4 d post MI and when EF < 48.9%; ↑ LV perfusion |
- Citation: Reddy K, Khaliq A, Henning RJ. Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction. World J Cardiol 2015; 7(5): 243-276
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v7/i5/243.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v7.i5.243