Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Cardiol. May 26, 2015; 7(5): 243-276
Published online May 26, 2015. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i5.243
Table 1 Causes of troponin elevation
SystemCauses of troponin elevation
CardiovascularAcute aortic dissection
Arrhythmia
Medical ICU patients
Hypotension
Heart failure
Apical ballooning syndrome
Cardiac inflammation
Endocarditis, myocarditis, pericarditis
Hypertension
Infiltrative disease
Amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, hemochromatosis, scleroderma
Left ventricular hypertrophy
Myocardial injuryBlunt chest trauma
Cardiac surgeries
Cardiac procedures
Ablation, cardioversion, percutaneous intervention
Chemotherapy
Hypersensitivity drug reactions
Envenomation
RespiratoryAcute PE
ARDS
Infectious/immuneSepsis/SIRS
Viral illness
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura
GastrointestinalSevere GI bleeding
Nervous systemAcute stroke
Ischemic stroke
Hemorrhagic stroke
Head trauma
RenalChronic kidney disease
EndocrineDiabetes
Hypothyroidism
MusculoskeletalRhabdomyolysis
IntegumentaryExtensive skin burns
InheritedNeurofibromatosis
Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Klippel-Feil syndrome
OthersEndurance exercise
Environmental exposure
Carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulfide
Table 2 Electrocardiogram manifestations of acute myocardial ischemia (in absence of left ventricular hypertrophy and left bundle branch block)
ST elevation
New ST elevation at the J point in two contiguous leads with the cut-points:
≥ 0.1 mV in all leads other than leads V2–V3 where the following cut points apply: ≥ 0.2 mV in men ≥ 40 yr; ≥ 0.25 mV in men < 40 yr, or ≥ 0.15 mV in women
ST depression and T wave changes
New horizontal or down-sloping ST depression ≥ 0.05 mV in two contiguous
leads and/or T inversion ≥ 0.1 mV in two contiguous leads with prominent R wave or R/S ratio > 1
Table 3 Third universal classification of myocardial infarction
Type 1: Spontaneous MI
Spontaneous MI due to atherosclerotic plaque rupture, ulceration, fissuring, erosion, or dissection with resulting intraluminal thrombus in one or more of the coronary arteries leading to decreased myocardial blood flow or distal platelet emboli with ensuing myocyte necrosis. The patient may have underlying severe CAD, non-obstructive coronary disease or no CAD
Type 2: MI secondary to an ischemic imbalance
Myocardial injury with necrosis occurs due to conditions other than CAD that contribute to an imbalance between myocardial oxygen supply and/or demand such as coronary endothelial dysfunction, coronary artery spasm, coronary embolism, tachycardia-bradycardia arrhythmias, anemia, respiratory failure, hypotension, and hypertension
Type 3: MI resulting in death when biomarker values are unavailable
Cardiac death with symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia and presumed new ischemic ECG changes or new LBBB, but death occurs before blood samples can be obtained, before cardiac troponins biomarkers rise, or when cardiac biomarkers were not collected
Type 4A: MI related to percutaneous coronary intervention
MI associated with PCI is defined by elevation of cTn values greater than five times the 99th percentile upper normal reference limit (URL) in patients with normal baseline values (< 99th percentile URL) or a rise of cTn values by > 20% if the baseline troponins are elevated and are stable or falling. In addition one of the following criterion are required: (1) symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia; (2) new ischemic ECG changes or new LBBB; (3) angiographic loss of patency of a major coronary artery or a side branch or persistent slow- or no coronary flow or coronary embolization; or (4) demonstration with imaging of a new loss of viable myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality
Type 4B: MI related to stent thrombosis
MI associated with stent thrombosis detected by coronary angiography or autopsy in the presence of myocardial ischemia with a rise and/or fall of troponin biomarkers. One troponin measurement should be above the 99th percentile UR
Type 4C: MI related to restenosis
MI associated with restenosis defined as ≥ 50% stenosis or a complex lesion demonstrated at coronary angiography after (1) initial successful stent deployment; or (2) dilatation of a coronary artery stenosis with balloon angioplasty. These coronary angiographic changes should be associated with an increase and/or decrease of cTn values > 99th percentile URL and no other significant obstructive CAD
Type 5: MI related to coronary artery bypass grafting
MI associated with CABG is defined by elevation of cardiac troponins greater than ten times the 99th percentile URL in patients with normal baseline cTn values (< 99th percentile URL). In addition, one of the following should be present: (1) new pathological Q waves or new LBBB; or (2) angiographic documented new graft or new native coronary artery occlusion; or (3) new loss of viable myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality as shown by an imaging modality
Table 4 Proposed definition of clinically relevant myocardial infarction after both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting procedures
In patients with normal baseline CK-MBThe peak CK-MB measured within 48 h of the procedure rises to ≥ 10 × the local laboratory ULN, or to ≥ 5 × ULN with new pathologic Q-waves in ≥ 2 contiguous leads or new persistent LBBB, OR in the absence of CK-MB measurements and a normal baseline cTn, a cTn (I or T) level measured within 48 h of the PCI rises to ≥ 70 × the local laboratory ULN, or ≥ 35 × ULN with new pathologic Q-waves in ≥ 2 contiguous leads or new persistent LBBB
In patients with elevated baseline CK-MB (or cTn) in whom the biomarker levels are stable or fallingThe CK-MB (or cTn) rises by an absolute increment equal to those levels recommended above from the most recent pre-procedure level
In patients with elevated CK-MB (or cTn) in whom the biomarker levels have not been shown to be stable or fallingThe CK-MB (or cTn) rises by an absolute increment equal to those levels recommended above plus new ST-segment elevation or depression plus signs consistent with a clinically relevant MI, such as new onset or worsening heart failure or sustained hypotension
Table 5 Bone marrow and circulating progenitor cells in coronary artery disease patients
Ref.nRandomizeTimepost PCI and/or MICell doseInjection routeBaseline LVEFLVEFchangeDurationOther findings
Assmus et al[215]92Yes2348-2470 d22 ± 106 CPC 205 ± 110 × 106 BMCICCPC 39% ± 10% BMC: 41% ± 11%CPC -0.4% BMC 2.90%3 moPts with previous MI; ↑ LVEF in BMC but not CPC
Bartunek et al[216]35Cohort10 d12.6 ± 2.2 × 106IC45% ± 2.5%7%4 mo↑ LV regional function, perfusion; restenosis ↑
Chen et al[217]69Yes18.4 ± 0.5 d8-10 × 109IC49% ± 9%18%6 mo↑ LVEF by ventriculogram ↑ perfusion; ↓ ESV
Erbs et al[218]26Yes225 ± 87 d69 ± 14 × 106IC51.7% ± 3.7%7.20%3 moPts with chronic CAD occlusion Rxed with CPC; ↓ EF by MRI; infarct size 16%
Ge et al[219]20Yes1 d39 ± 22 × 106IC53.8% ± 9.2%4.80%6 mo↑ Perfusion by SPECT
Hendrikx et al[220]20Yes217 ± 162 d60 ± 31 × 106 IMIM42.9% ± 10.3%5%4 moCABG in Pts with previous CAD ↑ Regional but not global LV function; 6/9 with induced ventricular tachycardia
Janssens et al [221]67Yes1 d172 × 106IC48.5 ± 7.23.30%4 mo↓ Infarct size
Kang et al[222]96Yes< 14 d AMI; > 14 d OMI1-2 × 109IC52.0 ± 9.95.10% AMI6 moG-CSF for 3 d; ↓ ESV and infarct size in AMI; = EF, ESV and infarct size in OMI
Katritsis et al[223]22Cohort224 ± 464 d2-4 × 106IC39.7% ± 9.3%1.60%4 mo↑ Regional but not global LV function
Lunde et al[224,225]100Yes6 ± 1.3 d68 × 106 (median) 54-130 × 106IC41.3 ± 11.0=6-12 mo↑ LVEF in treated and controls; = EDV and infarct size
Meyer et al[226]60Yes4.8 ± 1.324.6 ± 9.4 × 108IC50 ± 105.90%18 ± 6 mo↑ LVEF by MRI significant at 6 but not 18 mo
Mocini et al[227]36CohortAMI < 6 mo292 ± 232 × 106 IMIM46% ± 6%5%3-12 moCABG in all; troponin increased
Perin et al[228]20CohortICM25.5 ± 6.3 × 106IM Trans-Endo-cardial30% ± 6%5.10%12 moLVEF = Controls; ↑ LV perfusion ↑ Exercise
Ruan et al[229]20YesApproximately 1 dNRIC53.5% ± 5.8%5.80%6 mo↑ LV segmental contraction
Schächinger et al[230,231]204Yes3-8 d2.4 × 108IC48.3% ± 9.2%6%-7%4-12 mo↑ EF when Rx > 4 d post MI and when EF ↑ ≤ 48.9; LV perfusion
Strauer et al[232]20Cohort5-9 d2.8 ± 2.2 × 107 IMIC57% ± 8%5%3 mo↑ Regional but not global LVEF; ↓ ESV and ↓ Infarct size
Li et al[234]70Yes7 ± 5 d7.3 ± 7.3 × 107IC50% ± 8.2%7%6 moG-CSF for 5 d; ↓ LV ESV, ↓ LV wall motion score
Table 6 Stem cells in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction
Ref.nRandom-izedTimepost MICell doseBaselineLVEFDurationOther findings
Strauer et al[232]20Cohort8 d2.8 ± 2.2 × 10757% ± 8%5%3 mo↑ Regional but not global LVEF ↓ LV ESV and infarct size
Bartunek et al[216]35Cohort10 d12.6 ± 2.2 × 10645% ± 2.5%7%4 mo↑ LV regional function, ↑ perfusion; ↑↑ restenosis
Li et al[234]70Yes6 d7.3 ± 7.3 × 10750 ± 8.27%6 mo↓ LV ESV, LV wall motion score
Janssens et al[221]67Yes1 d172 × 10648.5 ± 7.23.30%4 mo↓ Infarct size
Meyer et al[226] and Wollert et al[237]60Yes4.8 d24.6 × 10850.0 ± 10.0=6-18 mo↑ LVEF at 6 but not at 18 mo
Kang et al[222]96Yes4 d1-2 × 10952.0 ± 9.95.1% AMI6 mo↓ LV ESV and infarction in acute MI; = ESV and = old MI
Lunde et al[224,225]100Yes6 d68 × 10641.3 ± 11.0=6-12 moLVEF ↑ in treated and controls; = EDV and infarct size
Ge et al[219]20Yes1 d4 × 10753.8 ± 9.24.80%6 mo↑ LV regional wall perfusion by SPECT
Meluzín et al[235,236]66Yes5-9 d107-10842 ± 0.03-53-12 mo↑ LVEF 3% @107↑ LVEF 5%-7% @ 108 3-12 mo
Schächinger et al[230,231]204Yes3-8 d2.4 × 10848.3 ± 9.26-74-12 mo↑ EF when Rx > 4 d post MI and when EF < 48.9%; ↑ LV perfusion