Review
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Cardiol. Aug 26, 2014; 6(8): 836-846
Published online Aug 26, 2014. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i8.836
Table 1 Valve academic research consortium-2 classification of vascular access site and access-related complications
Major vascular complications
Any aortic dissection, aortic rupture, annulus rupture, left ventricle perforation, or new apical aneurysm/pseudoaneurysm OR
Access site or access-related vascular injury (dissection, stenosis, perforation, rupture, arterio-venous fistula, pseudoaneurysm, hematoma, irreversible nerve injury, compartment syndrome, percutaneous closure device failure) leading to death, life-threatening or major bleeding1, visceral ischemia or neurological impairment OR
Distal embolization (non-cerebral) from a vascular source requiring surgery or resulting in amputation or irreversible end-organ damage OR
The use of unplanned endovascular or surgical intervention associated with death, major bleeding, visceral ischemia or neurological impairment OR
Any new ipsilateral lower extremity ischemia documented by patient symptoms, physical exam, and/or decreased or absent blood flow on lower ex tremity angiogram OR
Surgery for access site-related nerve injury OR
Permanent access site-related nerve injury
Minor vascular complications
Access site or access-related vascular injury (dissection, stenosis, perforation, rupture, arterio-venous fistula, pseudoaneurysms , hematomas, percutaneous closure device failure) not leading to death, life-threatening or major bleeding1, visceral ischemia or neurological impairment OR
Distal embolization treated with embolectomy and/or thrombectomy and not resulting in amputation or irreversible end-organ damage OR
Any unplanned endovascular stenting or unplanned surgical intervention not meeting the criteria for a major vascular complication OR
Vascular repair or the need for vascular repair (via surgery, ultrasound-guided compression, transcatheter embolization, or stent-graft)
Percutaneous closure device failure
Failure of a closure device to achieve hemostasis at the arteriotomy site leading to alternative treatment (other than manual compression or adjunctive endovascular ballooning)
Table 2 Incidence of major vascular access site complications and specific vascular access site types across transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation studies
Ref.BioprosthesesPopulationMajor vascular complicationsStenosis/ occlusionPerforation/ruptureDissectionPseudoaneurysm
Webb et al[40], Circulation 2009ESV1139/113 (8%)NANANANA
Ducrocq et al[8], Eurointervention 2010ESV549/54 (16.7%)0/95/9 (55.5%)4/9 (45.5%)0/9
Tchetche et al[9], Eurointervention 2010ESV + MCV45 24 ESV 21 MCV4/45 (8.9%) 2/24 (8.3%) ESV 2/21 (9.5%) MCV1NANANANA
Piazza et al[41], Eurointervention 2008MCV64612/646 (1.9%)NANANANA
Himbert et al[42], JACC 2009ESV516/51 (12%)0/62/6 (33%)4/6 (66%)0/6
Webb et al[1], Circulation 2007ESV504/50 (8%)0/44/4 (100%)0/40/4
SOURCE registry[43], Circulation 2009ESV46357/463 (12.3%)NANANANA
Lefèvre et al[44], Eur Heart J 2011ESV6117/61 (28%)0/613/61 (5%)6/61 (10%)1/161 (2%)
Canadian experience[45], JACC 2010ESV16822/168 (13.1%)NANANANA
Bleiziffer et al[46], J ThoracCardiovasc Surg 2009MCV15324/153 (16%)NANANANA
The Milan experience JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010[47]ESV + MCV107 61 ESV 46 MCV22 /107 (20.6%) 13/61 (21.3%) ESV 9/46 (19.5%) MCV11/22 (4.5%) ESV7/22 (32%) 5/13 (38%) ESV 2/9 (22%) MCV16/22 (27%) 4/13 (31%) ESV 2/9 (22%) MCV14/22 (18%) MCV
The Rotterdam experience[7], Eurointervention 2010MCV9913/99 (13%)NANANANA
The France Registry[48], Eur Heart J 2011ESV + MCV160 94 ESV 66 MCV11/160 (7%) 6/94 (6.4%) ESV 5/66 (7.6%) MCV10/112/11 (18%) ESV7/11 (64%) 4/6 (67%) ESV 3/5 (60 %) MCV10/11
Petronio et al[49], Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2010MCV4609/460 (2%)NANANANA
Spanish experience[50], Rev Espan Cardiol 2010MCV1086/108 (5.6%)1/6 (16.6%)1/6 (16.6%)0/61/6 (6.60%)
United Kingdom Registry[51], JACC 2011ESV + MCV599 193 ESV 406 MCV50/599 (8.4%)NANANANA
Toggweiler et al[15], JACC 2012ESV+ MCV137 126 ESV 11 MCV24/137 (18%)216/24 (66.6%)2/24 (8.3%)2/24 (8.3%)2/24 (8.3%)
Partner trial[52], JACC 2012ESV41964/419 (15.3%)NA20/64 (31.3%)40/64 (62.8%)2/64 (3.4%)
The France II Registry[53], NEJM 2013ESV + MCV3195 2107 ESV 1043 MCV150/3195 (4.7%) 57/2107 (2.7%) 47/1043 (4.5%)NANANANA
European Sentinel Registry of TAVI[54], Eurointervention 2013ESV + MCV4571 2604 ESV3 1943 MCV40/4571 (3.1%) 20/2604 (3.3%) 20/1943 (2.8%)NANANANA
Sawa et al[55], Circulation Journal 2014MCV445/44 (11.54%)NANANANA
Spanish National Registry of TAVI[56], Rev Esp Cardiol 2013ESV + MCV1159 504 ESV 610 MCV42/1159 (3.6%) 25/504 (5%) 17/610 (2.8%)NANANANA
Total12862640/12862 (5%)18/143 (12.6%)44/207 (21.2%)69/207 (33.3%)10/207 (4.8%)
Table 3 Materials for bailout endovascular interventions to manage vascular access complications (through contralateral femoral access using the “crossover” technique)
ComplicationType of bailout endovascular interventionDevices needed
Any typeImmediate angiography and prompt access to the affected iliac-femoral axis16-9 F long (45 cm) sheaths
Iliac-femoral arteries rupture/ perforationImmediate hemostasis to avoid shockLarge peripheral balloons in iliac arteries (diameter: 7-10 mm) or elastomeric balloon in the distal aorta
Vascular sealing in case of persistent blood extravasation after prolonged balloon inflationCovered stent (diameter: 7-10 mm)
Failure of hemostasis at the entry siteProlonged balloon inflation proximal to the entry site during external manual compressionMid-sized peripheral balloons (diameter: 6-8 mm)
Iliac-femoral arteries flow-limiting dissectionImmediate restoration of antegrade flow to avoid acute limb ischemiaLarge peripheral balloons (diameter: 7-10 mm)
Vascular sealing in case of significant stenosis/dissection after balloon inflationPeripheral self-expandable nitinol stents (diameter: 7-10 mm)
Iliac-femoral arteries acute thrombotic occlusionImmediate restoration of antegrade flow to avoid acute limb ischemiaThrombus aspiration with thrombus-extraction devices (angiojet, thrombus-aspirating catheters) or with coronary guiding catheters (multipurpose curve) Peripheral balloons (diameter: 5-10 mm) Consider distal filter protection to avoid embolization and avoid aggressive dilations since dethrombosis is usually facilitated by antegrade flow restoration