Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Cardiol. Jun 26, 2014; 6(6): 424-433
Published online Jun 26, 2014. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i6.424
Table 1 Effect of direct transfer on time delays n (%)
nDTBTTTFPStaffRef.
161 (DT 13)87 vs 168-14%Physician[24]
658 (DT 25.2)-146 vs 191-Physician[25]
401 (DT 59.9)124 vs 154 (group PPCI)--Paramedics[55]
301 (DT 35.8)74 vs 116150 vs 2037%Paramedics (teletransmission)[28]
344 (DT 39.2)69 vs 123158 vs 230-Paramedics[21]
1437 (DT 42.9)83 vs 103150 vs 200-Paramedics (teletransmission)[26]
581 (DT 78)69 vs 118149 vs 219-Paramedics (computed algorithm)[61]
1194 (DT 21)102 vs 125189 vs 2594.7%Physician[27]
1859 (DT 23)105 vs 122185 vs 255-Physician[67]
Table 2 Effect of direct transfer on clinical events n (%)
nShort-term mortalityLate mortalityAdjusted mortalityRef.
401 (DT 59.9)13.3% vs 5%, P = 0.001--[55]
1204 (DT 66.9)4.9% vs 8.6%, P = 0.0111.5% vs 15.6%, P < 0.05OR = 1.67 use ED[57]
467 (DT 44.7)1% vs 3.2%, P = NS2.1% vs 5.6%, P = 0.04OR = 0.3 if DT[23]
344 (DT 39.2)3.7% vs 5.7%, P = 0.36% vs 7.7%, P = 0.67-[21]
1437 (DT 42.9)--HR = 0.67 at 1 yr for death/reMI in DT[26]
7098 (DT 27.4)6.7% vs 9.5%, P = NS-OR = 0.80, P = NS in DT[62]
581 (DT 78)7% vs 13%, P = 0.03--[61]
1389 (DT 59.2)3% vs 8.1%, P > 0.0015% vs 11.5%, P < 0.001OR = 0.52 at 180 d[66]
1194 (DT 21)2.7% vs 6.8%, P = 0.0179% vs 16%, P = 0.005OR = 0.33 at 30 d[27]
1859 (DT 23)3% vs 6%, P = 0.0499.4% vs 14.4%, P = 0.008 at a median 2.4 yrHR = 0.71 at 2.4 yr[67]

  • Citation: Estévez-Loureiro R, López-Sainz &, Pérez de Prado A, Cuellas C, Calviño Santos R, Alonso-Orcajo N, Salgado Fernández J, Vázquez-Rodríguez JM, López-Benito M, Fernández-Vázquez F. Timely reperfusion for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Effect of direct transfer to primary angioplasty on time delays and clinical outcomes. World J Cardiol 2014; 6(6): 424-433
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v6/i6/424.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v6.i6.424