Editorial
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Cardiol. Dec 26, 2012; 4(12): 312-326
Published online Dec 26, 2012. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v4.i12.312
Table 1 Summary of endothelial progenitor cell levels in different disease populations
DiseaseResultsCommentsRef.
Aging↓ EPCs proliferation[20,22]
↓ EPCs migration
↓ EPCs survival
Coronary heart disease↓ EPC activity[29]
↓ EPC migratory capacity
CHF↑ EPC levels in mild stages[34,35][34-36]
↑ EPC levels in acute exacerbation[36]
↑ Late apoptotic progenitors[35]
↓ EPC levels in advanced stages[34,35]
LVADs↑ EPC levels[38,39]
PAH↑ EPC levels[42,45,46]Conflicting results[42-46]
↓ EPC levels[43,44]
Critical illness↑ EPC levels in sepsis and septic shock[47,49][47-49]
↑ EPC levels in early acute lung injury[48]
COPD↑ EPC levels[52]Conflicting results[52-56]
↓ EPC levels[53,54]
↑ EPC levels in exacerbation of COPD[55]
↓ EPC mobilization and colony-forming capacity[56]
OSA↑ EPC levels[58,60]Conflicting results[57-60]
↓ EPC levels[59]
- No difference[57]
Diabetes mellitus type Iand II↓ EPC levels[61-65]
Cerebrovascular disease↓ EPC levels in stroke[66][66-69]
- No difference in ischemic stroke[67]
↑ EPC levels in acute ischemic stroke[67]
↓ EPC levels in atherothrombotic cerebral ischemic event[68]
↓ EPC colony forming in acute stroke[69]
PAD↑ EPC levels in moderate phase[71,72]
↑ EPC levels in advance phase
Arterial hypertension↑ EPC levels in early stage of hypertension[73][19,73,74]
↓ EPC migratory capacity in CAD and hypertension[19]
- No difference on EPC levels in pre-hypertensive and hypertensive[74]
Obesity↓ EPC levels[75-77][75-79]
↓ EPC colony forming capacity[76]
Table 2 Effects of exercise training on endothelial progenitor cells in animals and healthy subjects
SubjectsnStudy group; ageModalityExercise prescriptionDurationResultsLimitationsRef.
Mice12Exercise group; Control groupAerobicExercise group: Voluntary running 5100 ± 800 m 7 d a week; Control group: No intervention28 d↑ EPCs[101]
Healthy male10Exercise (n = 10) 59 ± 2 yrHome based aerobicWalking/jogging 60%-75% predicted peak HR 40-50 min-5-7 sessions per week3 mo↑ EPC colonies about 100% from 10 ± 3 to 22 ± 5; ↑ Migratory activity about 50% from 683 ± 96 to 1022 ± 123 RFUsNon control study[20]
Healthy male47Exercise: Elderly (n = 25) 67.8 ± 3.38 yr, young (n = 22) 26.3 ± 3.15 yrAerobicTreadmill 30 min 3 sessions per week12 wk↑Re-endothelialization capacity of EPCs from 15% ± 4% to 36% ± 9%Non control study[102]
Healthy male (n = 7), female (n = 13)20Interval exercise: Moderate (n = 9), heavy (n = 11)AerobicErgometer moderate interval (10 s @ 120% peak work rate : 20 s @ 20 W); Heavy interval (30 s @ 120% peak work rate : 60 s @ 20 W), 30-40 min 3 sessions per week6 wkNo significant change on EPC numbersNon control study measurements took place 48 h after the last session[103]
Children182Intervention (n = 109), control (n = 73)Intervention group: PA at school 45 min + endurance training 15 min per school day; Control group: PA at school 45 min 2 school day per week1 school year↑ CPCs[104]
Table 3 Effects of exercise training on endothelial progenitor cells in different disease populations
SubjectsnStudy group; ageDiseaseModalityExercise prescriptionDurationResultsLimitationsRef.
Mice12Exercise; ControlAdvanced atherosclerotic lesions; Early atherosclerotic lesionsAerobicVoluntary running8 wkNo change on advanced atherosclerotic lesions; ↑ EPC levels on early atherosclerotic lesions[107]
Mice10Exercise; ControlAfter traumatic brain injuryAerobicExercise group: Treadmill 22 m/min 30 min 7 d per week; Control group: No intervention1 wk↑ Neuronal stem cell[108]
Male (n = 24); Female (n = 51)64Exercise (n = 32); Control (n = 32) 67.1 ± 8.4 yr oldCoronary artery diseaseAerobic + resistance exerciseExercise group: Bicycle ergometer, treadmill, rowing, steps, arm ergometer + dumbbell, weight training 80% of HRmax 50 min + (5 min warm-up and 5 min cool down) 3 sessions per week8 wkNo change[109]
Male (n = 92); Female (n = 20)112Exercise (n = 112) 58.2 ± 9.5 yr oldAfter acute coronary syndromeAerobicExercise group: Bicycle ergometer 60%-70% of peak VO2 30 min + ( 5 min warm-up and 5 min cool down) 3 sessions per week30 d↑ EPC levels + ↓ pro-inflammatory markersNo controls; No homogeneity of population[110]
Male (n = 20); Female (n = 10)30Exercise (n = 16); Control (n = 14) 67 ± 12 yr oldHemodialysisAerobicExercise group: Treadmill/walking 50% max speed 10 min 2 sessions per day; Control group: No intervention6 moNo changeSmall sample size; No standarized work[111]
Male (n = 16); Female (n = 6)22Exercise (n = 22) 61.4 yr old (SE 1.60)CHF NYHA II or IIIAerobicExercise group: Bicycle ergometer 60% of HR reserve 45 min + (5 min warm-up and 5 min cool down) 3 sessions per week8 wk↑ EPC levelsNo controls; No homogeneity of population[112]
Male (n = 30); Female (n = 8)38Exercise (n = 21) 61.3 ± 2.2 yr old; Control (n = 17) 63.4 ± 3 yr oldCHFAerobicExercise group: 90% HR 60 min 3 sessions per week; Control group: No intervention6 moImproves CAC migratory capacity; ↑ EPC levelsNo randomization[113]
Male (n = 16); Female (n = 12)28Exercise (n = 14) 72 ± 11 yr old; Control (n = 14) 73 ± 11 yr oldCHF Exercise NYHA II; Control NYHAICalistenics + aerobicExercise group: Bicycle ergometer 75%-85% of HRmax 30 min 2 sessions per day 6 sessions per week; Control group: No intervention3 wk↑ EPC levelsSmall sample size[114]
Male37Exercise (n = 18) 60 ± 11 yr old; Control (n = 19) 62 ± 10 yr oldNYHA functional class IIIbAerobic + calisthenics + noncompetitive ball gamesExercise group: Bicycle ergometer in hospital (50% of VO2max 5-20 min, 3-6 sessions per day, 3 wk) home exercise (60% of VO2max 20-30 min, 7 sessions per week, 12 wk) + 1 supervised session ( 60 min, walking, calisthenics, ball games); Control group: No intervention12 wk↑ EPC levels[115]
Male37Exercise (n = 15) 65 ± 7 yr old; CHF control (n = 15) 63 ± 7 yr old; Healthy control (n = 7) 66 ± 4 yr oldNYHA functional class IIAerobicExercise group: Bicycle ergometer HR of ventilatory threshold 30 min 5 sessions per week; Control groups: No intervention3 moExercise group ↑ EPC levels; Control patient group no change[116]
Male (n = 24); Female (n = 16)40Exercise (n = 30) 69 ± 8 yr old; Control (n = 20) 70 ± 11 yr oldPADAerobicExercise group: Treadmill intermittent walking 5-10 min warm-up 35-50 min 2 sessions per week; Control group: No exercise intervention6 mo↑ EPC levels[117]
Male (n = 22); Female (n = 18), median age 48 yr40Exercise (n = 40); Group A (n = 21) compliant individuals; Group B (n = 19) noncompliant individualsOverweight and obese BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²AerobicNon supervised self reported walking briskly or moderate running 45 min HR @ the individual anaerobic threshold 3 sessions per week3 moGroup A ↑ EPC levels; Group B no changeSmall sample size; Limited duration of follow-up; Non valid compliance measurement; Unable to distinguish which (exercise or weight change) contributed to the increased EPC levels[118]
Table 4 Acute effects of exercise in healthy subjects
SubjectsnStudy group; age (yr)ModalityExerciseResultsLimitationsRef.
Men22Healthy 54 ± 10Symptom limited exercise testTreadmill/bicycle↑ EPC + ↑ CAC[120]
Men16Healthy 25.1 ± 2.7Bruce modifiedTreadmill↑ EPC + ↑ NO level[121]
Men (n = 2); Women (n = 9)11Healthy 31 ± 161 h Spinning sessionBicycle 80% HRmax↑ OECNo accurate peak VO2 measurements, no gender differentiation[122]
Men18Healthy (sportive) 32.4 ± 2.3Ergometer testBicycle 70% IAT 240 min↑ EPCNo control[123]
Men23Endurance athletes 62 ± 1.6; Healthy low active 65 ± 1.5Exercise testTreadmill 75% ± 5% VO2max 30 min (5 min ramp-up + 25 min + 3 min cool down)No change in both groups, no change between groups[124]
Men; Women25GroupI(n = 11) 23.9 ± 1.4; Group II (n = 14) 36.2 ± 9.3Symptom limited cardiopulmonary exercise testBicycle ergometer: 40 W warm up; 20 W incremental test↑ EPCSmall sample size[125]
Men25HealthyRunning exerciseProtocol 1 30 min 100% IAT; Protocol 2 30 min 80% IAT; Protocol 3 10 min 80% IATProtocol 1 ↑ EPC; Protocol 2 ↑ EPC; Protocol 3 no change[126]
Men68Marathon runners 57 ± 6MarathonRaceNo change[127]
Men10Marathon protocol (n = 9) 43.6 ± 11.6; Field test protocol (n = 8) 43.4 ± 10.9Running exerciseMarathon protocol marathon race; Field test protocol 1500 m max speedMarathon protocol no change; Field test protocol ↑ EPC[128]
Men20Spartathlon runners (n = 10) 42.8 ± 1.4 Control sedentary (n = 10) 42.2 ± 10.4SpartathlonExercise group race (246 km); Control group no interventionSpartathlon runners ↑ EPC; Control no change[129]
Table 5 Acute effects of exercise in different disease populations
SubjectsnStudy group; age (yr)DiseaseModalityExercise prescriptionDurationResultsRef.
Men37Young group (n = 9), mean age 33; Old group (n = 13), mean age 66; PAD group (n = 15), mean age 69PADTreadmillYoung group bruce protocol; Old group gardner protocol; PAD group gardner protocolYoung group until exhaustion or 15 min; Old group 10 min; PAD group symptom limited or 10 minYoung group ↑ EPCs; Old group no change; PAD group no change[130]
Male (n = 41); Female (n = 13)54Healthy controls (n = 13) 55.7 ± 1.6; Mild CHF (n = 22) 61.9 ± 2.5; Severe CHF (n = 19) 63 ± 2.6CHFBicycle ergometerCardiopulmonary exercise testing individualized ramp protocol8-10 minEPC no change; Improved CAC migration in mild CHF + severe CHF[131]
Male (n = 13); Female (n = 2)15Young group (n = 4) mean age 33; Old group (n = 4) mean age 66; CHF group (n = 7) mean age 69CHF II/IIIBicycle ergometerSymptom-limited graded exercise test↑EPCs in young group; ↑EPCs in old group; Non significant ↑EPCs in CHF group[132]