Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Cardiol. Jan 26, 2012; 4(1): 8-14
Published online Jan 26, 2012. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v4.i1.8
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the transcatheter aortic valve implantation population in atrial fibrillation and non-atrial fibrillation groups (n = 17) n (%)
AF groupSR groupP
Male gender6 (35.3)7 (41.2)0.72
Age (yr)81.383.90.15
Diabetes8 (47.1)6 (35.3)0.49
Hypertension14 (82.4)9 (52.9)0.07
Peripheral vascular disease4 (23.5)1 (5.9)0.15
Significant coronary disease6 (35.3)10 (58.8)0.17
Prior stroke3 (17.7)2 (11.8)0.63
Chronic respiratory failure2 (11.8)4 (23.5)0.37
Chronic renal failure3 (17.7)00.07
Hemodialysis2 (11.8)00.14
Prior warfarin use15 (88.2)0< 0.01
Logistic euroSCORE (mean)27.918.70.07
Baseline echocardiogram features
Aortic valve area (cm2, mean)0.660.720.35
Peak gradient (mmHg, mean)76.971.40.42
Mean gradient (mmHg, mean)44.241.80.60
LVEF (mean)55.9%57.5%0.66
Table 2 Procedural and in-hospital outcomes (n = 17) n (%)
AF groupNon-AF groupP
Valve size (mm)0.27
2313 (76.5)10 (58.8)
264 (23.5)7 (41.2)
Access0.55
Transfemoral16 (94.1)15 (88.2)
Transapical1 (5.9)2 (11.8)
Procedural success16 (94.1)17 (100)0.31
Any peri-procedural complication7 (41.2)7 (41.2)1.00
Death2 (11.8)2 (11.8)1
Emergent heart surgery01 (5.9)0.31
Orotracheal intubation > 24 h01 (5.9)0.31
Proshtesis embolization00-
Endocarditis00-
New onset AF1 (5.9)1 (5.9)1.00
Coronary obstruction1 (5.9)1 (5.9)1.00
Myocardial infarction1 (5.9)1 (5.9)1.00
Stroke00-
Renal failure requiring hemodialysis00-
New pacemaker implantation2 (11.8)1 (5.9)0.55
Major access site complications02 (11.8)0.14
Minor access site complications2 (11.8)4 (23.5)0.37
Transfusion5 (29.4)2 (11.8)0.20
Post-procedural stay (mean days)14.410.20.22
Table 3 Antithrombotic treatment at discharge in patients of the atrial fibrillation group who survived to hospital discharge (n = 15)
PatientAgeGenderCHA2DS2-VASCHAS-BLEDTreatment at dischargeFollow up (mo)Non-fatal eventsFollow up (mo)Survival
187Female65Warfarin2None2Alive
276Male44Aspirin32None32Alive
381Female53Warfarin + Aspirin7None7Alive
480Female43Warfarin1None1Alive
590Female62Warfarin26None26Alive
677Female53Warfarin23None23Alive
768Female22Aspirin + Clopidogrel10None10Alive
883Male74Warfarin + Aspirin3None3Death, non-cardiac
980Female32Warfarin19None19Alive
1079Female53Warfarin + Aspirin30Stroke31Death, non-cardiac
1184Female53Warfarin + Clopidogrel1Heart failure admission31Alive
1287Female42Warfarin + Aspirin6None6Alive
1383Female32Warfarin5None5Alive
1482Male33Warfarin + Aspirin2None2None
1568Male32Warfarin + Clopidogrel1Heart failure admission3Alive
Table 4 Follow-up echocardiographic evaluation of the prosthetic valve (mean follow-up 14.7 mo)
AF groupSR groupP
Aortic valve area (cm2, mean)1.662.050.18
Peak gradient (mmHg, mean)18.619.30.86
Mean gradient (mmHg, mean)9.511.00.51
LVEF (mean)59%62.9%0.14
Valvular aortic regurgitation
No70%66.7%-
Mild30%33.3%-
Moderate0%0%-
Severe0%0%-
Paravalvular aortic regurgitation
No10%55.6%-
Mild70%44.4%-
Moderate20%0%-
Severe0%0%-

  • Citation: Salinas P, Moreno R, Calvo L, Jiménez-Valero S, Galeote G, Sánchez-Recalde A, López-Fernández T, Garcia-Blas S, Iglesias D, Riera L, Moreno-Gómez I, Mesa JM, Plaza I, Ayala R, Gonzalez R, López-Sendón JL. Clinical and prognostic implications of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. World J Cardiol 2012; 4(1): 8-14
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v4/i1/8.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v4.i1.8