Copyright
©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Cardiol. May 26, 2010; 2(5): 118-124
Published online May 26, 2010. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v2.i5.118
Published online May 26, 2010. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v2.i5.118
Table 1 Baseline clinical characteristics
All (n = 59) | No CAD by angiography (n = 25) | CAD by angiography (n = 34) | |
Baseline characteristics | |||
Age (yr) | 62 ± 11 | 61 ± 13 | 62 ± 10 |
History of angina | 37 (63) | 13 (52) | 24 (71) |
Echo ejection fraction (%) | 59 ± 11 | 59 ± 7 | 59 ± 12 |
Invasive LV end-diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 15 ± 7 | 14 ± 6 | 15 ± 8 |
Baseline heart rate (beats/min) | 67 ± 12 | 66 ± 11 | 69 ± 13 |
Maximum heart rate during ETT (beats/min) | 129 ± 19 | 137 ± 19 | 122 ± 17 |
Baseline ST depression | 12 (20) | 2 (8) | 10 (29) |
Maximum workload during ETT (W) | 132 ± 41 | 149 ± 43 | 119 ± 34 |
Heart rate × SBP at rest (mmHg/min) | 9357 ± 2397 | 8991 ± 2314 | 9634 ± 2457 |
Heart rate × SBP at peak exercise (mmHg/min) | 25 790 ± 5740 | 27 870 ± 5070 | 24 210 ± 5780 |
Rise in double pressure product (factor) | 2.9 ± 0.9 | 3.3 ± 1.0 | 2.6 ± 0.7 |
Baseline SBP (mmHg) | 138 ± 24 | 137 ± 22 | 140 ± 27 |
Maximum SBP during ETT (mmHg) | 200 ± 28 | 203 ± 25 | 197 ± 29 |
Symptomatic ST depression (mm) | 1.98 ± 0.55 | NA | 1.98 ± 0.55 |
Silent ST depression (mm) | 2.05 ± 1.23 | NA | 2.05 ± 1.23 |
LBBB | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 1 (3) |
RBBB | 3 (5) | 2 (8) | 1 (3) |
Acoustic cardiographic S3 detected | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 1 (3) |
Acoustic cardiographic S4 detected | 6 (10) | 1 (4) | 5 (14) |
CAD risk factors | |||
High cholesterol (> 5.2 mmol/L) | 41 (69) | 18 (72) | 23 (68) |
Stage 1 blood pressure (SBP 140-159, DBP 90-99 mmHg) | 18 (30) | 7 (28) | 11 (32) |
Stage 2 blood pressure (SBP > 160, DBP > 100 mmHg) | 14 (24) | 5 (20) | 9 (26) |
Diabetes (fasting glucose > 6.1) | 5 (8) | 2 (8) | 3 (9) |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | |||
Overweight (25-29.9) | 29 (49) | 11 (44) | 18 (53) |
Obese (> 30) | 14 (24) | 5 (20) | 9 (26) |
Age (men > 45 yr, women > 55 yr) | 41 (69) | 17 (68) | 24 (71) |
Prior myocardial infarction | 13 (22) | 5 (20) | 8 (23) |
Table 2 Medical therapy in patients with and without CAD by angiography
Condition | All (n = 59) | No CAD by angiography (n = 25) | CAD by angiography (n = 34) |
Hyperlipidemia | 23 (70) | 7 (86) | 16 (62.5) |
Hypertension | 30 (87) | 12 (92) | 18 (83) |
Diabetes | 5 (20) | 2 (0) | 3 (33) |
Table 3 Extent of angiographic CAD
All (n = 34) | S4 at Max HR (n = 18) | ST depression (n = 10) | S4 or ST depression (n = 23) | |
Left main artery | 2 (6) | 1 (6) | 1 (10) | 2 (9) |
Left anterior descending | 24 (71) | 15 (83) | 8 (80) | 20 (87) |
Right circumflex artery | 17 (50) | 10 (56) | 7 (70) | 13 (57) |
Right coronary artery | 24 (71) | 10 (56) | 6 (60) | 13 (57) |
One-vessel disease | 13 (38) | 7 (39) | 3 (30) | 8 (35) |
Two-vessel disease | 10 (29) | 5 (28) | 2 (20) | 6 (26) |
Three-vessel disease | 11 (32) | 6 (33) | 5 (50) | 9 (39) |
Invasive ejection fraction (%) | 65 ± 11 | 67 ± 11 | 70 ± 12 | 67 ± 11 |
Invasive LVEDP (mmHg) | 15 ± 8 | 18 ± 9 | 11 ± 8 | 15 ± 9 |
Table 4 Diagnostic performances of ECG versus heart sounds in 59 patients (40 men, 19 women)
Parameter | Group | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PLR | NLR |
ST depression | All | 29 (CI 17-46) | 92 (CI 75-98) | 3.68 (CI 0.88-15.3) | 0.77 (CI 0.60-0.98) |
ST depression | Men | 28 (CI 14-48) | 93 (CI 70-99) | 4.2 (CI 0.57-30.9) | 0.77 (CI 0.58-1.02) |
ST depression | Women | 33 (CI 12-65) | 90 (CI 60-98) | 3.33 (CI 0.42-26.58) | 0.74 (CI 0.45-1.23) |
S4 present | All | 53 (CI 37-69) | 92 (CI 75-98) | 6.62 (CI 1.7-25.9) | 0.51 (CI 0.35-0.74) |
S4 present | Men | 52 (CI 34-70) | 93 (CI 70-99) | 7.8 (CI 1.13-53.8) | 0.51 (CI 0.34-0.79) |
S4 present | Women | 56 (CI 27-81) | 90 (CI 60-98) | 5.56 (CI 0.79-39.01) | 0.49 (CI 0.23-1.06) |
S4 or ST-depression | All | 68 (CI 51-81) | 84 (CI 65-94) | 4.23 (CI 1.7-10.7) | 0.39 (CI 0.23-0.65) |
- Citation: Zuber M, Erne P. Acoustic cardiography to improve detection of coronary artery disease with stress testing. World J Cardiol 2010; 2(5): 118-124
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v2/i5/118.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v2.i5.118