Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Cardiol. Mar 26, 2023; 15(3): 106-115
Published online Mar 26, 2023. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i3.106
Published online Mar 26, 2023. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i3.106
Table 1 Patient characteristics
Characteristic | Group I, n = 120 patients | Group II, n = 120 patients | P value |
Age in yr | 57.9 ± 9.6 | 59.1 ± 10.7 | 0.38 |
Male sex | 96 (80) | 93 (77.5) | 0.64 |
Smoking | 49 (40.8) | 58 (48.3) | 0.24 |
Hypertension | 35 (29.2) | 43 (35.8) | 0.27 |
Diabetes mellitus | 38 (31.7) | 40 (33.3) | 0.78 |
CKD | 4 (3.3) | 7 (5.8) | 0.35 |
Family history of CAD | 15 (12.5) | 21 (17.5) | 0.28 |
Dyslipidemia | 61 (50.8) | 49 (40.8) | 0.12 |
Location of MI: Anterior MI non-anterior MI | 72 (60) 48 (40) | 61 (50.8) 59 (49.2) | 0.15 |
Time from chest pain onset to reperfusion in hr | 4.04 ± 1.96 | 4.39 ± 2.79 | 0.29 |
Table 2 Heart rate and QT interval before and after reperfusion, all patients
Parameter | Before reperfusion, n = 240 patients | After reperfusion, n = 240 patients | ∆ | P value |
Heart rate in beat/min | 78.6 ± 16.2 | 80.5 ± 15.7 | -1.8 ± 16.9 | 0.09 |
Maximum QT in msec | 407.1 ± 43.0 | 398.7 ± 45.2 | 8.5 ± 47.8 | 0.007 |
Minimum QT in msec | 325.4 ± 41.7 | 341.3 ± 43.7 | -15.9 ± 42.4 | < 0.001 |
QTD in msec | 81.8 ± 21.9 | 57.3 ± 18.9 | 24.4 ± 18.7 | < 0.001 |
Maximum QTc in msec | 461.2 ± 42.5 | 456.1 ± 38.9 | 5.1 ± 47.8 | 0.10 |
Minimum QTc in msec | 368.5 ± 37.6 | 390.0 ± 36.4 | -22.4 ± 44.5 | < 0.001 |
QTcD in msec | 92.7 ± 26.1 | 65.2 ± 22.6 | 27.5 ± 19.6 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Heart rate and QT interval before and after reperfusion, group I vs group II
Parameter | Group I, n = 120 patients | Group II, n = 120 patients | P value | ||||||||
Before | After | ∆ | Before | After | ∆ | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | |
Heart rate in beat/min | 81.0 ± 15.7 | 82.7 ± 16.4 | -1.7 ± 18.9 | 76.2 ± 16.3 | 78.2 ± 14.8 | -2.0 ± 14.9 | 0.34 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.87 |
Maximum QT in msec | 411.7 ± 38.4 | 392.0 ± 44.1 | 19.7 ± 48.8 | 402.6 ± 46.9 | 405.3 ± 45.6 | -2.8 ± 44.3 | < 0.001 | 0.49 | 0.10 | 0.02 | < 0.001 |
Minimum QT in msec | 320.2 ± 34.6 | 338.1 ± 39.0 | - 17.9 ± 34.4 | 330.6 ± 47.4 | 344.6 ± 48.0 | -14.0 ± 41.3 | < 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.06 | 0.25 | 0.48 |
QTD in msec | 91.5 ± 20.6 | 53.9 ± 19.1 | 37.6 ± 17.1 | 72.0 ± 18.5 | 60.7 ± 18.1 | 11.3 ± 7.9 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.005 | < 0.001 |
Maximum QTc in msec | 474.3 ± 45.9 | 453.8 ± 38.1 | 20.6 ± 53.1 | 448.1 ± 34.1 | 458.4 ± 39.7 | -10.4 ± 35.8 | < 0.001 | 0.002 | < 0.001 | 0.35 | < 0.001 |
Minimum QTc in msec | 369.9 ± 43.2 | 393.0 ± 32.1 | - 23.1 ± 51.7 | 367.1 ± 31.1 | 388.9 ± 40.3 | -21.8 ± 36.2 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.56 | 0.38 | 0.82 |
QTcD in msec | 104.4 ± 22.1 | 60.8 ± 21.6 | 43.6 ± 13.6 | 80.9 ± 24.4 | 69.6 ± 22.8 | 11.4 ± 8.0 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.003 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 QT and corrected QT dispersion before and after reperfusion in patients with or without in-hospital arrhythmia
Parameter | In-hospital arrhythmia group, n = 33 patients | No in-hospital arrhythmia group, n = 207 patients | P value | ||||||||
Before | After | ∆ | Before | After | ∆ | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | |
QTD in msec | 82.1 ± 19.3 | 67.3 ± 22.7 | 14.8 ± 18.9 | 81.7 ± 22.3 | 55.8 ± 17.7 | 25.9 ± 18.3 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.91 | 0.001 | 0.003 |
QTcD in msec | 94.0 ± 25.3 | 74.2 ± 24.9 | 19.8 ± 14.5 | 92.5 ± 26.2 | 63.7 ± 21.9 | 28.7 ± 20.1 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.75 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
Table 5 Studies addressing repolarization changes following reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Ref. | Study type | Study population | Time to evaluation | Reduction of QTD and QTcD | In-hospital arrhythmia | Remarks |
Lopes et al[21], 2006 | Retrospective | Thrombolytic (n = 154) | 4 d | Sig. after 4 d | QTD not correlated with arrhythmia | CA after 48 h; Reduction in QTD is a predictor of coronary reperfusion |
Ornek et al[22], 2014 | Prospective | Thrombolytic (n = 20) | 7 d | Sig. after 7 d | QTD correlated with arrhythmia | Use 24-h Holter monitor |
Mulay et al[23], 2004 | Prospective | STEMI (n = 100) Normal (n = 100) | 24 hr On discharge | NA | Sig. high QTD in patients with ventricular arrhythmias compared to those without | Sig. higher QTD on admission, at 24 h, and at discharge than normal subjects |
Pan et al[24], 2011 | Prospective | PPCI (n = 81) | 24 h | Sig. after 24 h | NA | QTcD change was an independent predictor of MACE at 1 yr |
Hamza et al[25], 2014 | Retrospective | PPCI (n = 54) | 90 min 24 hr | Not sig after 90 min Sig. after 24 h | NA | |
Oni Heris et al[26], 2014 | Prospective | Thrombolytic (n = 160) | 1 hr 4 d | Not sig. after 1 hr Not sig. after 4 d | NA | |
Babapour et al[27], 2018 | Retrospective | PPCI (n = 77) | 24 h | Not sig. after 24 hr | NA | |
Cavusoglu et al[28], 2001 | Prospective | PPCI (n = 21) Thrombolytic (n = 21) | 24 h | Sig. in PPCI group Sig. in thrombolytic group Sig. in PPCI compared with thrombolytic | NA | |
George et al[29], 2015 | Prospective | PPCI (n = 25) Thrombolytic (n = 25) | 24 h | Sig. in PPCI group Not sig. in thrombolytic group Sig. in PPCI compared with thrombolytic | NA | |
Valizadeh et al[30], 2020 | Prospective | PPCI (n = 70) Thrombolytic (n = 115) | 24 h | Sig. in PPCI group Not sig. in thrombolytic group Not sig. in PPCI compared with thrombolytic | QTD mean in patients with arrhythmia was reduced before and after treatment with a significant reduction after PPCI as compared to thrombolysis |
- Citation: Abdelmegid MAKF, Bakr MM, Shams-Eddin H, Youssef AA, Abdel-Galeel A. Effect of reperfusion strategy on QT dispersion in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Impact on in-hospital arrhythmia. World J Cardiol 2023; 15(3): 106-115
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v15/i3/106.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v15.i3.106