Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Cardiol. Mar 26, 2023; 15(3): 106-115
Published online Mar 26, 2023. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i3.106
Table 1 Patient characteristics
Characteristic
Group I, n = 120 patients
Group II, n = 120 patients
P value
Age in yr57.9 ± 9.659.1 ± 10.70.38
Male sex96 (80)93 (77.5)0.64
Smoking49 (40.8)58 (48.3)0.24
Hypertension35 (29.2)43 (35.8)0.27
Diabetes mellitus38 (31.7)40 (33.3)0.78
CKD4 (3.3)7 (5.8)0.35
Family history of CAD15 (12.5)21 (17.5)0.28
Dyslipidemia61 (50.8)49 (40.8)0.12
Location of MI: Anterior MI non-anterior MI72 (60) 48 (40)61 (50.8) 59 (49.2)0.15
Time from chest pain onset to reperfusion in hr4.04 ± 1.964.39 ± 2.790.29
Table 2 Heart rate and QT interval before and after reperfusion, all patients
Parameter
Before reperfusion, n = 240 patients
After reperfusion, n = 240 patients

P value
Heart rate in beat/min78.6 ± 16.280.5 ± 15.7-1.8 ± 16.90.09
Maximum QT in msec407.1 ± 43.0398.7 ± 45.28.5 ± 47.80.007
Minimum QT in msec325.4 ± 41.7341.3 ± 43.7-15.9 ± 42.4< 0.001
QTD in msec81.8 ± 21.957.3 ± 18.924.4 ± 18.7< 0.001
Maximum QTc in msec461.2 ± 42.5456.1 ± 38.95.1 ± 47.80.10
Minimum QTc in msec368.5 ± 37.6390.0 ± 36.4-22.4 ± 44.5< 0.001
QTcD in msec92.7 ± 26.165.2 ± 22.627.5 ± 19.6< 0.001
Table 3 Heart rate and QT interval before and after reperfusion, group I vs group II
ParameterGroup I, n = 120 patients
Group II, n = 120 patients
P value
Before
After

Before
After

P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
Heart rate in beat/min81.0 ± 15.782.7 ± 16.4-1.7 ± 18.976.2 ± 16.378.2 ± 14.8-2.0 ± 14.90.340.140.020.020.87
Maximum QT in msec411.7 ± 38.4392.0 ± 44.119.7 ± 48.8402.6 ± 46.9405.3 ± 45.6-2.8 ± 44.3< 0.0010.490.100.02< 0.001
Minimum QT in msec320.2 ± 34.6338.1 ± 39.0- 17.9 ± 34.4330.6 ± 47.4344.6 ± 48.0-14.0 ± 41.3< 0.0010.0010.060.250.48
QTD in msec91.5 ± 20.653.9 ± 19.137.6 ± 17.172.0 ± 18.560.7 ± 18.111.3 ± 7.9< 0.001< 0.001< 0.0010.005< 0.001
Maximum QTc in msec474.3 ± 45.9453.8 ± 38.120.6 ± 53.1448.1 ± 34.1458.4 ± 39.7-10.4 ± 35.8< 0.0010.002< 0.0010.35< 0.001
Minimum QTc in msec369.9 ± 43.2393.0 ± 32.1- 23.1 ± 51.7367.1 ± 31.1388.9 ± 40.3-21.8 ± 36.2< 0.001< 0.0010.560.380.82
QTcD in msec104.4 ± 22.160.8 ± 21.643.6 ± 13.680.9 ± 24.469.6 ± 22.811.4 ± 8.0< 0.001< 0.001< 0.0010.003< 0.001
Table 4 QT and corrected QT dispersion before and after reperfusion in patients with or without in-hospital arrhythmia
Parameter
In-hospital arrhythmia group, n = 33 patients
No in-hospital arrhythmia group, n = 207 patients
P value
BeforeAfterBeforeAfterP1P2P3P4P5
QTD in msec82.1 ± 19.367.3 ± 22.714.8 ± 18.981.7 ± 22.355.8 ± 17.725.9 ± 18.3< 0.001< 0.0010.910.0010.003
QTcD in msec94.0 ± 25.374.2 ± 24.919.8 ± 14.592.5 ± 26.263.7 ± 21.928.7 ± 20.1< 0.001< 0.0010.750.030.02
Table 5 Studies addressing repolarization changes following reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Ref.
Study type
Study population
Time to evaluation
Reduction of QTD and QTcD
In-hospital arrhythmia
Remarks
Lopes et al[21], 2006 RetrospectiveThrombolytic (n = 154)4 dSig. after 4 d QTD not correlated with arrhythmiaCA after 48 h; Reduction in QTD is a predictor of coronary reperfusion
Ornek et al[22], 2014ProspectiveThrombolytic (n = 20)7 dSig. after 7 dQTD correlated with arrhythmiaUse 24-h Holter monitor
Mulay et al[23], 2004 ProspectiveSTEMI (n = 100) Normal (n = 100)24 hr On dischargeNASig. high QTD in patients with ventricular arrhythmias compared to those without Sig. higher QTD on admission, at 24 h, and at discharge than normal subjects
Pan et al[24], 2011 ProspectivePPCI (n = 81)24 hSig. after 24 hNAQTcD change was an independent predictor of MACE at 1 yr
Hamza et al[25], 2014 RetrospectivePPCI (n = 54)90 min 24 hrNot sig after 90 min Sig. after 24 hNA
Oni Heris et al[26], 2014 ProspectiveThrombolytic (n = 160)1 hr 4 dNot sig. after 1 hr Not sig. after 4 dNA
Babapour et al[27], 2018 RetrospectivePPCI (n = 77)24 hNot sig. after 24 hrNA
Cavusoglu et al[28], 2001 ProspectivePPCI (n = 21) Thrombolytic (n = 21) 24 hSig. in PPCI group Sig. in thrombolytic group Sig. in PPCI compared with thrombolyticNA
George et al[29], 2015 ProspectivePPCI (n = 25) Thrombolytic (n = 25)24 hSig. in PPCI group Not sig. in thrombolytic group Sig. in PPCI compared with thrombolyticNA
Valizadeh et al[30], 2020 ProspectivePPCI (n = 70) Thrombolytic (n = 115)24 hSig. in PPCI group Not sig. in thrombolytic group Not sig. in PPCI compared with thrombolyticQTD mean in patients with arrhythmia was reduced before and after treatment with a significant reduction after PPCI as compared to thrombolysis