Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Cardiol. Apr 26, 2022; 14(4): 239-249
Published online Apr 26, 2022. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v14.i4.239
Table 1 Demographic and clinical variables in the study groups
Demographic variables
Control, n = 15
ESRD-HD, n = 15
ESRD-PD, n = 15
Total, n = 15
Age (yr)34 ± 1336 ± 234 ± 1034.6 ±
Gender, n (%)F = 10 (67), M = 5 (33)F = 26 (84), M = 5 (16)F = 12 (39), M = 19 (61)F = 48 (62), M = 29 (38)
BMI (kg/m2 )23.423.322.423 ±
Hypertension, n (%)N/A28 (90)31 (100)59 (77)
DMT2, n (%)N/A2 (6.45)5 (16)7 (9.09)
Table 2 Biochemical and left ventricular remodeling variables in the study groups: Control, end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis and end-stage renal disease on peritoneal dialysis
VariablesControlESRD-HDESRD-PDP value
Biochemical
PTH (pg/mL)50 ± 4.55a,c1188 ± 203.91188 ± 203.9< 0.0001
Ca2+ (mg/dL)8.55 ± 2.348.47 ± 0.148.38 ± 0.09NS
P (mg/dL)4.56 ± 2.284.75 ± 0.244.75 ± 0.28NS
Ca2+/P (mg2/dL2)45.32 ± 1.0542.31 ± 2.3539.87 ± 2.5NS
Albumin (mg/dL)4.47 ± 0.10a,c4.13 ± 0.123.94 ± 0.06< 0.0284
Hemoglobin (g/dL)15.3 ± 0.12a,c8.73 ± 0.248.91 ± 0.22< 0.0001
LV remodeling
LV mass (g)133.8 ± 3a,c182.7 ± 12.2186.6 ± 15< 0.0001
LVMI (g/m2)70.65 ± 2.11a,c130.2 ± 6.24127.5 ± 6.55< 0.0001
RWT0.39 ± 0.016a,c0.51 ± 0.010.51 ± 0.02< 0.0001
Table 3 Echocardiographic population variables control, end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis and end-stage renal disease on peritoneal dialysis
Variables
Control
ESRD-HD
ESRD-PD
P value
LVEF60.75 ± 1.3063.5 ± 10.3661.8 ± 11.19NS
GLS (%)21 ± 0.58a,c13 ± 0.7212 ± 1.83< 0.0001
LAV (mL/m2)33.07 ± 0.22a,c26.49 ± 1.425.73 ± 1.57< 0.0001
E/A ratio1.25 ± 0.03a,c1.05 ± 0.060.91 ± 0.05< 0.0001
E/é ratio5.38 ± 0.18a,c11.62 ± 0.9612.22 ± 1.13< 0.0001
E (cm/s)60.39 ± 1.71a,c80.19 ± 6.2681.29 ± 6.97< 0.0001
Lateral e’ (cm/s)13.44 ± 0.36a,c8.33 ± 0.437.49 ± 0.16< 0.0001
Septal é (cm/s)10.85 ± 0.35a,c6.18 ± 0.246.49 ± 0.23< 0.0001
TRV (m/s)2.21 ± 0.02a,c2.94 ± 0.082.80 ± 0.07< 0.0001
LVMI (g /m2)70.65 ± 2.11a,c130.2 ± 6.24127.5 ± 6.55< 0.0001
RWT0.39 ± 0.016a,c0.51 ± 0.010.51 ± 0.02< 0.0001
Table 4 Global longitudinal strain and variables association
Variables Univariate
Multivariate using significant variables
Multivariate by step method
B
β
95%CI for B
P value
B
β
95%CI for B
P value
B
β
95%CI for B
P value
Lower limit
Upper limit
Lower limit
Upper limit
Lower limit
Upperlimit
Association with GLS (%)
Hemoglobin-1.09-0.61-1.42-0.770.00-0.58-0.32-1.12-0.050.03-0.62-0.35-0.99-0.260.00
Hypertension5.600.543.587.610.001.520.15-1.444.490.31
PTH0.000.500.000.000.000.000.270.000.000.010.000.290.000.000.00
LVEF-0.04-0.08-0.150.070.50
LVH6.400.574.278.530.00-1.82-0.16-7.754.120.54
LVMI0.060.510.040.080.000.030.280.010.050.010.030.290.010.050.00
RWT11.360.251.2721.460.03-1.21-0.03-10.147.730.79
Table 5 Association between parathyroidism levels and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction variables
Variables
Univariate
Multivariate using significant variables
Multivariate by step method
B
β
95%CI for B
P value
B
β
95%CI for B
P value
B
β
95%CI for B
P value
Lower limit
Upper limit
Lower limit
Upper limit
Lower limit
Upper limit
Association with PTH
E/é ratio54.220.3318.3490.090.0028.190.17-11.5567.930.16
é lateral-124.,51-0.36-199.34-49.690.00-81.10-0.23-177.0614.870.10-89.72-0.26-169.01-10.440.03
é septal-121.78-0.28-215.64-27.910.01-0.630.00-121.22119.970.99
TRV698.980.35276.861121.100.00360.730.18-141.53862.990.16500.880.2553.87947.890.03

  • Citation: Carrasco-Ruiz MF, Ruiz-Rivera A, Soriano-Ursúa MA, Martinez-Hernandez C, Manuel-Apolinar L, Castillo-Hernandez C, Guevara-Balcazar G, Farfán-García ED, Mejia-Ruiz A, Rubio-Gayosso I, Perez-Capistran T. Global longitudinal strain is superior to ejection fraction for detecting myocardial dysfunction in end-stage renal disease with hyperparathyroidism. World J Cardiol 2022; 14(4): 239-249
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v14/i4/239.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v14.i4.239