Zhang W, Usman Y, Iriawan RW, Lusiana M, Sha S, Kelly M, Rao C. Evaluating the quality of evidence for diagnosing ischemic heart disease from verbal autopsy in Indonesia. World J Cardiol 2019; 11(10): 244-255 [PMID: 31754412 DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v11.i10.244]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Wenrong Zhang, Doctor, Department of Global Heath, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, 62 Mills Road, Canberra, ACT 2602, Australia. wenrong.zhang@anu.edu.au
Research Domain of This Article
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Article-Type of This Article
Basic Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Cardiol. Oct 26, 2019; 11(10): 244-255 Published online Oct 26, 2019. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v11.i10.244
Table 1 Data variables used for analysis of quality of evidence from verbal autopsy questionnaires
Data category
Data variables
General information of deceased
Age / sex
Place of death (health facilities/home)
Relationship with respondent
Recall period of interview
Structured questions
Previous medical history (heart disease, stroke, hypertension, diabetes, etc.)
Signs and symptoms of terminal illness
Risk factors
Use of health services
Cause of death provided by health staff
Open sections
Respondent’s free-flowing narrative of the course of illness and terminal events
Information from available health records
Physician reviewer’s case summary
Table 2 Distribution of each category of strength of evidence
Category
Criteria
Cases
Proportion
Strong
(1) Surgery for coronary heart disease (1%); (2) Terminal chest pain and two of: (A) Sudden death; (B) History of heart disease; (C) Medical diagnosis of heart disease3; (D) Terminal shortness of breath.
213
53%
Medium
(1) Terminal chest pain alone; (2) Sudden death AND either: (A) History of heart disease OR; (B) Medical diagnosis of heart disease; (3) Only medical diagnosis of heart disease.
87
22%
Weak
(1) Only history of heart disease; (2) Only symptomatic evidence (without chest pain): (A) Sudden death; (B) Hypertension; (C) Shortness of breath.
98
24.5%
Nil
No evidence for the cause of death.
2
0.5%
TOTAL
400
100
Table 3 Sample description by socio-demographic factors and health background
Citation: Zhang W, Usman Y, Iriawan RW, Lusiana M, Sha S, Kelly M, Rao C. Evaluating the quality of evidence for diagnosing ischemic heart disease from verbal autopsy in Indonesia. World J Cardiol 2019; 11(10): 244-255