Coronary angiography findings in cardiac arrest patients with non-diagnostic post-resuscitation electrocardiogram: A comparison of shockable and non-shockable initial rhythms

Abstract

AIM

To investigate the impact of coronary artery disease in a cohort of patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest with non-diagnostic electrocardiogram.

METHODS

From March 2004 to February 2016, 203 consecutive patients resuscitated from in or out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest and non-diagnostic post-resuscitation electrocardiogram (defined as ST segment elevation or pre-sumably new left bundle branch block) who underwent invasive coronary angiogram during hospitalization were included. For purpose of analysis and comparison, patients were classified in two groups: Initial shockable rhythm (ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation; n = 148, 72.9%) and initial non-shockable rhythm (n = 55, 27.1%). Baseline characteristics, coronary angiogram findings including Syntax Score and long-term survival rates were compared.

RESULTS

Sudden cardiac arrest was witnessed in 95.2% of cases, 66.7% were out-of-hospital patients and 72.4% were male. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups except for higher mean age (68.1 years vs 61 years, P = 0.001) in the non-shockable rhythm group. Overall 5-year mortality of the resuscitated patients was 37.4%. Patients with non-shockable rhythms had higher mortality (60% vs 29.1%, P < 0.001) and a worst neurological status at hospital discharge based on cerebral performance category score (CPC 1-2: 32.7% vs 53.4%, P = 0.02). Although there were no significant differences in global burden of coronary artery disease defined by Syntax Score (mean Syntax Score: 10.2 vs 10.3, P = 0.96) there was a trend towards a higher incidence of acute coronary lesions in patients with shockable rhythm (29.7% vs 16.4%, P = 0.054). There was also a higher need for ad-hoc percutaneous coronary intervention in this group (21.9% vs 9.1%, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Initial shockable group of patients had a trend towards higher incidence of acute coronary lesions and higher need of ad-hoc percutaneous intervention vs non-shockable group.

Key Words: Sudden cardiac arrest; Electrocardiogram; Invasive coronary angiography; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Syntax score; Coronary artery disease

Core tip: Coronary artery disease represents the most common cause of sudden cardiac arrest. Current re-suscitation guidelines recommend emergency coronary angiography in patients with cardiac arrest and ST elevation or new left bundle branch block on post-resuscitation electrocardiogram. However, electrocardiogram findings may be a poor predictor of an acute coronary lesion in this context and nowadays, the benefit of early coronary angiography is still under debate in patients without ST elevation. In this study, we analyzed our single-center data of patients with cardiac arrest and non-diagnostic electrocardiogram to describe the burden of coronary artery disease and their prognosis depending on initial rhythm.

INTRODUCTION

Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is one of the most common causes of death in the developed world, affecting nearly 560000 people annually in the United States. Although a majority of deaths occur during the initial resuscitation, a substantial proportion of cardiac arrest deaths occur in patients who have been initially successfully resuscitated after first medial contact. Despite the important advances in emergency medical services and post cardiac arrest syndrome care over the last decades, survival free from neurological deficit is still low[1].

Coronary artery disease (CAD) represents the most common cause of SCA and current resuscitation guidelines recommend the performance of an emergency coronary angiography (CA) and appropriate percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with SCA and ST segment elevation or presumably new left bundle branch block (LBBB) on post-resuscitation electrocardiogram (ECG). In patients without ST elevation after SCA but with suspected or with a high risk of cardiac origin, emergency CA is reasonable in selected situations (for example, electrically or hemodynamically unstable patients)[2,3]. Such “suspicion of cardiac origin” is not well defined and therefore the recommendation remains somewhat ambiguous.

Regarding the likelihood of a cardiac origin of the SCA, the ECG may be a poor predictor of acute coronary occlusion in resuscitated patients[4-7]. Also, a recent meta-analysis showed a high prevalence of significant CAD ranging from 59% to 71% in patients resuscitated from SCA without an obvious non-cardiac etiology[8]. Furthermore, pre-arrest symptoms reported in this setting are unreliable and dependent on the presence of by-standers. In summary, the suspicion of cardiac origin is largely subjective or uncertain for most patients. For these reasons, and without available randomized data, the justification for use of an early invasive strategy in survivors of SCA without an obvious non-cardiac cause of arrest is based on observational data[9-11].

From a single-center registry of patients resuscitated from SCA undergoing CA, we present in this paper the results of a sub-analysis comparing patients with shockable and non-shockable initial rhythms[12]. The aim of this sub-analysis was to investigate the impact of CAD in a cohort of SCA patients with non-diagnostic ECG depending on initial rhythm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population

All patients recovered from in or out-of-hospital SCA and admitted to a tertiary care center with 24/7 emergent PCI availability that underwent invasive CA were extracted from a multipurpose database including data from interventional procedures, critical care unit and hospital admission.

From March 2004 to February 2016, 545 consecutive SCA patients were identified. For this study, we focused on patients without emergent indication for CA. Therefore, patients with ST segment elevation or presumably new LBBB on post-resuscitation ECG, or cardiogenic shock at admission were excluded (n = 317). Of the remaining 228 patients, 25 had unavailable or incomplete CA films. Thus, our final study population was 203 patients. For the purpose of this sub-analysis, patients were classified into two groups depending on initial ECG: Shockable [ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (n = 148, 72.9%)] and non-shockable rhythm (n = 55, 27.1%) (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Patient flowchart. CA: Coronary angiography; CS: Cardiogenic shock; ECG: Electrocardiogram; LBBB: Left bundle branch block; SCA: Sudden cardiac arrest.

Clinical and outcome data were collected from clinical record, patient’s charts or telephone contact with patients or their relatives. Follow-up was completed up to 5-year after index admission.

Cardiac catheterization

The indication and timing of CA in our study population was individualized for each patient based on treating physician’s criterion. CA was classified as early when performed < 24 h after hospital admission or late when performed ≥ 24 h after admission. Two interventional cardiologist reviewed all CA blinded to original reports. The percentage diameter stenosis (DS%) was visually estimated for each lesion. Quantitative CA was used if discordances > 10% were found between both investigators. Significant stenosis was defined as ≥ 50 DS%, severe stenosis when DS% was ≥ 70% and non-obstructive CAD when DS% was < 50%. A normal coronary angiogram was defined as 0 DS% in all arteries with no other pathological findings. Culprit lesion was defined as the presence of an acute arterial occlusion (plaque rupture with occlusive thrombus) or an incomplete coronary artery occlusion in presence of complex lesion morphology as previously defined[13]. Chronic total occlusion (CTO) was defined as a Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 0 flow for at least 3 mo of estimated duration. Estimation of occlusion duration was based on at least one of the following: Prior history of myocardial infarction in the target vessel territory, comparison with a previous angiogram, or the presence of collateral circulation or bridging collaterals. Critical stenosis was considered when DS% was ≥ 90% but < 100% and there were no CTO features. Acute coronary lesion was defined as critical or culprit lesion for the purpose of this investigation. Ad-hoc PCI was defined if performed at the moment of the index CA at the operator’s discretion. Procedural success was defined as complete restoration of antegrade blood flow (TIMI 3) and < 30% residual diameter stenosis by visual assessment.

Burden of CAD was measured using the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus And Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) Score and number of vessels with significant and/or severe stenosis. We calculated the Syntax Score for each patient, as previously reported[14,15]. If the patient had previous PCI we used residual Syntax score (rSS) defined as the SYNTAX score remaining after PCI. If the patient had previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery we calculated the CABG-SYNTAX score proposed by Farooq et al[16]. Both rSS and CABG-SYNTAX score reflect the current burden of CAD (successfully revascularized segments are equalized to segments with CAD < 50%, thus not incrementing SYNTAX score).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 21 (SPSS Inc, Illinois, Chicago, United States). Continuous variables are presented as mean and standard deviation. Categorical variables are expressed as frequency and percentage. In quantitative variables, the groups were compared using a two-tailed Student’s t-test for independent samples. Categorical variables were compared with the χ² test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the cumulative patient survival rates and log-rank test for comparison. All test were two sided and P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics

Of 203 consecutive patients resuscitated from SCA with non-diagnostic ECG, 148 had initial shockable rhythm and 55 had non-shockable rhythm. Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the study cohort. There were no statistical differences between groups in baseline characteristics except for higher mean age in the initial non-shockable group (68.1 years vs 61 years, P = 0.001).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study patients n (%).

	All patients (n = 203)	Non-shockable rhythm (n = 55)	Shockable rhythm (n = 148)	P value
Age (mean ± SD)	62.9 ± 14	68.1 ± 13	61 ± 13.9	0.001
Male sex	147 (72.4)	36 (65.5)	111 (75)	0.176
Arterial hypertension	123 (60.6)	37 (67.3)	86 (58.1)	0.235
Diabetes mellitus	65 (32)	22 (40)	43 (29.1)	0.137
Dyslipidemia	80 (39.4)	26 (47.3)	54 (36.5)	0.162
Smoking	103 (50.7)	27 (49.1)	76 (51.4)	0.775
Peripheral vascular disease	23 (11.3)	7 (12.7)	16 (10.8)	0.702
Cerebrovascular vascular disease	18 (8.9)	6 (10.9)	12 (8.1)	0.533
Prior MI	45 (22.2)	14 (25.5)	31 (20.9)	0.780
Prior PCI	35 (17.2)	10 (18.2)	25 (16.9)	0.829
Prior CABG	22 (10.8)	7 (12.7)	15 (10.1)	0.597
Out-of-hospital SCA	124 (66.7)	30 (58.8)	94 (69.6)	0.163
Time to ROSC	17.8 ± 12.7	14.8 ± 11.9	19 ± 12.9	0.122
Witnessed arrest	157 (95.2)	40 (93)	117 (95.9)	0.450
Coma status at admission	148 (84.6)	40 (88.9)	108 (83.1)	0.352
Cardiogenic shock	48 (23.6)	18 (32.7)	30 (20.3)	0.063
Therapeutic hypothermia	71 (41.8)	14 (32.6)	57 (44.9)	0.402

Values are given as mean ± SD or n (%). MI: Myocardial infarction; PCI: Percutaneous coronary intervention; CABG: Coronary artery bypass grafting; SCA: Sudden cardiac arrest; ROSC: Return of spontaneous circulation.

CA findings

Early CA was performed in 115 patients (56.9%). The most relevant angiography findings are reproduced in Table 2. Overall, mean value of Syntax Score calculated was 10.30 with no statistical differences between groups (10.33 vs 10.23, P = 0.95). There were also no differences (P = 0.71) in the percentage of vessels with significant stenosis (0, 1, 2 or 3 vessels with ≥ 50 DS%). However, patients with initial shockable rhythm showed a trend towards a higher incidence of acute coronary lesions (29.7% vs 16.4%, P = 0.054) and higher rate of ad-hoc PCI (21.9% vs 9.1%, P = 0.03), mainly for left anterior descending artery lesions (45.9%).

Table 2 Angiographic characteristics n (%).

	All patients (n = 203)	Non-shockable rhythm (n = 55)	Shockable rhythm (n = 148)	P value
Normal coronaries	71 (35)	20 (36.4)	51 (34.5)	0.800
Mean Syntax Score	10.3 ± 12.4	10.2 ± 13.6	10.3 ± 11.9	0.961
Any vessel with significant stenosis (DS ≥ 50%)	125 (61.6)	33 (60)	92 (62.2)	0.778
Significant stenosis
None	79 (38.9)	22 (40)	57 (38.5)	0.710
One vessel	46 (22.7)	15 (27.3)	31 (20.9)
Two vessels	40 (19.7)	9 (16.4)	31 (20.9)
Three vessels	38 (18.7)	9 (16.4)	29 (19.6)
Any vessel with severe stenosis (DS ≥ 70%)	111 (54.7)	28 (50.9)	83 (56.1)	0.480
Any CTO	60 (29.6)	14 (25.5)	46 (31.1)	0.388
Critical stenosis	51 (25.1)	9 (16.4)	42 (28.4)	0.079
Culprit lesion	25 (12.3)	4 (7.3)	21 (14.2)	0.173
Acute lesion	53 (26.1)	9 (16.4)	44 (29.7)	0.054
Ad hoc PCI	37 (18.2)	5 (9.1)	32 (21.6)	0.036

Values are given as mean ± SD or n (%). CTO: Chronic total occlusion; DS%: Percentage diameter stenosis; PCI: Percutaneous coronary intervention.

The prognostic value of acute coronary lesions as defined by this study was assessed through a stratified Kaplan Meier analysis. Figure 2 shows Kaplan Meier curves for all cause 5-year survival depending on the finding of an acute coronary lesion. Patients with shockable rhythm and with acute coronary lesions had a non-significant increased mortality, whereas no significant differences or trends were found in the non-shockable group. Interestingly, in patients with shockable rhythm, those who underwent ad hoc PCI of the acute coronary lesions had a trend towards improved survival compared to patients with untreated acute coronary lesions (mean all-cause survival 41.3 ± 5.4 mo vs 29.7 ± 6.9 mo, P = 0.147). However, in patients with initial non-shockable rhythm, ad hoc PCI did not improve survival rates (P = 0.948).

Figure 2 Kaplan Meier curves for all cause 5-year survival depending on the finding of an acute coronary lesion. ACL: Acute coronary lesion.

In-hospital and long-term survival

Overall, 151 (74.4%) patients survived until hospital discharge and 97 (64.2%) survived with a favorable neurological outcome based on cerebral performance category score (CPC). Patients with initial shockable rhythm had a better prognosis, with higher survival rates to discharge compared with those with non-shockable rhythm (56.4% vs 81.1%, P < 0.001). Patients with shockable rhythm also had a better neurological status at discharge (CPC 1-2: 32.7% vs 53.4%, P = 0.02). Five-years mortality was 37.4% in the global cohort. Patients with non-shockable rhythm had a higher five-year mortality (60% vs 29.1%, P < 0.001, Figure 3).

Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier curves for 5 years survival.

DISCUSSION

This study is a sub-analysis of a large single-center registry of selected SCA patients with CA and non-diagnostic post resuscitation ECG[12]. The present study compares shockable vs non-shockable rhythms and reveals a similar high burden of CAD in both groups. Although these findings are consistent with previous observational studies[8], our study is novel because it is the first to explore differences between shockable and non- shockable rhythms in this setting. Since the publication in 1997 of a seminal study by Spaulding et al[17], many studies with important methodological limitations have reported the possible survival impact of an early invasive approach in this context[9,18-21]. However, other studies did not find any benefit from such an invasive strategy and proposed to restrict it use to highly selected patients[10,11,22]. Besides, in contrast to the usual presentation of acute coronary syndromes, the standard tools to evaluate coronary ischemia in post cardiac arrest patients are less accurate. The sensitivity and specificity of the usual clinical data, ECG or biomarkers to predict an acute coronary artery occlusion are unclear[4-6,23]. For these reasons, there is still an ongoing debate on the use of an early invasive strategy in all survivors of SCA without an obvious non-cardiac cause. We conducted this sub-analysis in order to assess if the initial rhythm after resuscitation could be a predictor of CAD burden and acute coronary lesions.

Given the high probability of CAD (measured as mean Syntax Score), our data supports a low threshold for CA regardless of initial rhythm. According to current resuscitation guidelines, it is reasonable to discuss and consider emergent cardiac catheterization in patients with a high risk of a coronary cause for their cardiac arrest[3]. However, definitive data will come with the results of several ongoing randomized trials designed to determine whether early CA improves outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, in patients without ST elevation [one of those (COUPE trial) conducted by our group][24-27].

Some differences in acute coronary lesions were found between the two groups. Those patients with initial shockable rhythm had a higher incidence of acute coronary lesions (29.7% vs 16.4%, P = 0.054) and consequently a greater requirement of ad-hoc PCI (21.9% vs 9.1%, P = 0.03). These acute coronary lesions might also have a potential impact on prognosis (Figure 2). Unfortunately, our study was underpowered to show the effect of revascularization on these lesions, but this should be considered a relevant research target for future studies. These findings are in accordance with the observed trend that reveals that CA and PCI after ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation has substantially increased over the last years, regardless of the presence of ST elevation[28].

Regarding the prognosis of initial ECG rhythm analysis, SCA patients are usually divided into non-shockable rhythms (pulseless electrical activity and asystole) or shockable rhythms (ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation). Non-shockable rhythms are the most prevalent first recorder rhythm and survival rates of this group are worst compared with initial shockable rhythm[1]. Studies have shown that increased age, female gender, and prolonged ROSC are associated with a non-shockable rhythm while public location and witnessed arrest are associated with a shockable rhythm[29]. In our study, survival rates were also higher in patients with initial shockable rhythms (60% vs 29.1%, P < 0.001), as previously reported[1]. However, there were no statistical differences in baseline characteristic except for higher mean age (68.1 years vs 61 years, P = 0.001) in the non-shockable rhythm group, probably due to the study design and patients selection.

The present study should be interpreted within the context of several limitations of a single-center observational study and relatively small size of the study population. The cohort included in this study was selected from consecutive patients who survived to in or out-of-hospital SCA and were subsequently selected for CA by clinicians upon admission. Patients with an explicit non-cardiac etiology of SCA would not be selected for CA and the final decision to proceed with CA was based on the clinical judgment of individual physicians. It is likely that CA was selectively more frequently offered to patients with a better likelihood of neurological recovery.

In conclusion, in our cohort of patients with SCA and non-diagnostic ECG, initial shockable rhythm group of patients had a similar burden of CAD compared to those with non-shockable rhythms. Patients with initial shockable rhythm had a trend towards a higher incidence of acute coronary lesions and a higher need of ad-hoc percutaneous coronary intervention. A low threshold for early CA should be considered in this subgroup of resuscitated SCA patients.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Philip J Brabyn for English editing services.

COMMENTS

Background

Acute coronary syndromes are a common cause of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). Based on observational studies, current resuscitation guidelines recommend emergency coronary angiography (CA) in patients with SCA and ST segment elevation on post-resuscitation electrocardiogram (Class I, level B). However, because of fewer data available, in patients without ST segment elevation, emergency CA is reasonable in selected patients with suspected cardiac origin (Class II a, level C), regardless of initial rhythm.

Research frontiers

Electrocardiogram findings may be a poor predictor of an acute coronary lesion in patients after a SCA. Without randomized data, the benefit of early CA in patients without ST elevation remains controversial.

Innovations and breakthroughs

In patients with SCA and non-diagnostic post-resuscitation electrocardiogram, initial shockable rhythms show a trend towards a higher incidence of acute coronary lesions and higher need of ad-hoc percutaneous coronary intervention.

Applications

The results of the study suggest that a low threshold for early CA should be considered in this subgroup of resuscitated SCA patients.

Terminology

Shockable rhythms include ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in opposition to non-shockable rhythm that include asystole and pulseless electrical activity.

Peer-review

The manuscript is well-written, the statistical analysis is appropriate, and the data support the conclusions. This work will be of interest to the readership, and is potentially impactful regarding acute treatment of initially resuscitated, hospitalized cardiac arrest patients.