Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Cardiol. Jan 26, 2017; 9(1): 60-64
Published online Jan 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i1.60
Longitudinal deformation of a third generation zotarolimus eluting stent: “The concertina returns!”
Vasileios F Panoulas, Ozan M Demir, Neil Ruparelia, Iqbal Malik, Cardiology Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London W120HS, United Kingdom
Vasileios F Panoulas, Ozan M Demir, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
Vasileios F Panoulas, Department of Cardiology, Royal Brompton and Harefield, NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield Hospital, Harefield, Greater London UB9 6JH, United Kingdom
Author contributions: Panoulas VF and Demir OM contributed equally to this work; Panoulas VF and Demir OM wrote the case report; Ruparelia N edited the manuscript and contributed to image formatting; Malik I reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved by the Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust Institutional Review Board. Both patients provided informed consent.
Informed consent statement: All study participants provided informed written consent prior to study enrollment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare no conflict of interest.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Dr. Vasileios F Panoulas, MD, PhD, MRCP, FESC, Department of Cardiology, Royal Brompton and Harefield, NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, Harefield, Greater London UB9 6JH, United Kingdom. v.panoulas@imperial.ac.uk
Telephone: +44-1895-823737-5200 Fax: +44-1895-828892
Received: August 4, 2016
Peer-review started: August 5, 2016
First decision: September 2, 2016
Revised: September 15, 2016
Accepted: November 16, 2016
Article in press: November 17, 2016
Published online: January 26, 2017
Processing time: 167 Days and 17.6 Hours

Abstract

In the current case series we describe two cases of longitudinal stent deformation in ostial lesions treated with a new generation zotarolimus eluting stent and review current literature on longitudinal stent deformation. Historically not a common occurrence, longitudinal deformation occurred mainly in Promus Element everolimus eluting stents, which had only two rather than the commonly used 3 links between stent rings. Longitudinal deformation commonly occurs secondary to compression of the proximal edge of the stent by either the guide catheters, or intravascular balloons and imaging catheters. The degree of deformation however, depends on the longitudinal strength and design of the stent.

Key Words: Coronary angioplasty; Longitudinal stent deformation; Coronary stents; Procedural complications

Core tip: In the current case series we describe two cases of longitudinal stent deformation in ostial lesions treated with a new generation zotarolimus eluting stent and review current literature on longitudinal stent deformation.



INTRODUCTION

Over the last decade there has been remarkable progress in coronary stent design and materials. Early generation stents were stainless steel followed by the use of cobalt chromium and platinum chromium alloys, enabling stents to be thinner and more flexible, hence improving deliverability and conformability. In addition, thin stent struts have been associated with improved outcomes in drug eluting stents[1-3]. With the reduction in strut thickness, innovative designs have enabled maintenance of radial strength, however, longitudinal stent strength may have been compromised.

A recently observed complication includes longitudinal stent deformation, defined as the distortion or shortening of a stent in the longitudinal axis following successful stent deployment[4]. Longitudinal stent strength is dependent on the architectural composition - number, orientation, shape, thickness and material of the crest (or ring) and links. For example, the reduction in number of links between cells may enhance deliverability (by allowing more lateral bending) but as a consequence may compromise longitudinal strength. Longitudinal deformation can result in protrusion of struts into lumen. Extensive malapposition of struts may result in disruption of blood flow and increased risk of stent thrombosis[5,6]. In addition, longitudinal deformation of drug eluting stents may result in uneven drug delivery that can result in higher rates of instent restenosis[7].

In the current case series and review we describe two cases of longitudinal deformation with the new Resolute Onyx (Medtronic Inc., United States) zotarolimus eluting stents (ZES) and review the literature on longitudinal deformation. This new generation ZES has a novel design, manufactured from a single strand of core wire (platinum iridium) shaped into a continuous sinusoidal waveform. The strut thickness is 81 μm, rendering it extremely trackable and conformable. Every 4th crown is laser fused to provide uniform longitudinal strength across the length of the stent.

CASE REPORT
Case 1

A 78-year-old male with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and chronic renal failure presented with stable angina. Elective coronary angiography demonstrated significant lesions in the ostial and mid segments of a tortuous right coronary artery (RCA) (Figure 1A). The Judkins Right 4 catheter did not provide sufficient support therefore a 3 dimensional (3D) right coronary (Williams) guide catheter was used to intubate the RCA. This provided improved, yet suboptimal support, therefore a buddy wire was used to facilitate the implantation of a ZES (Resolute Onyx 2.75 mm × 38 mm, Medtronic) in the mid segment. Subsequently, the ostial-proximal lesion was pre-dilated, stented with a Resolute Onyx 3.0 mm × 22 mm ZES and post-dilated with a 3.0 mm non-compliant (NC) balloon (Figure 1B). Following stent deployment and removal of the buddy wire, significant longitudinal deformation was noted (Figure 1C), which was treated with non-compliant balloon dilatation and third ZES insertion (Resolute Onyx 3.0 mm × 18 mm) all the way to the ostium (Figure 1D).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Longitudinal deformation of a stent implanted at the ostium of the right coronary artery. A: Initial angiogram showing severe calcific lesions in proximal and mid right coronary artery; B: Proximal lesion stented all the way to cover the ostium with a Resolute Onyx 3.0 mm × 22 mm stent; C: Longitudinal deformation of proximal stent treated with 3.0 non-compliant balloon and another 3.0 mm × 18 mm Resolute Onyx stent; D: Final angiographic result.
Case 2

A 85-year-old male with end stage renal failure and severely impaired left ventricular systolic function presented with rapidly conducted atrial fibrillation and raised troponin (6000, upper normal limits 30) with inferolateral ST depression on electrocardiogram. On coronary angiography, he had severe three-vessel and left main disease. After being turned down for surgery, his proximal tight RCA lesion was stented with a Resolute Onyx 4.5 mm × 12 mm and post-dilated with a 5 mm non-compliant balloon. In view of the heavily calcified ostial/distal left main stem (LMS) and proximal left anterior descending (LAD) disease (Figure 2A) and bursting non-compliant balloons, decision was made to rotablate the lesions first with 1.5 mm burr. Subsequently a 3.0 mm non-compliant balloon was used to pre-dilate all lesions successfully. The proximal LAD was stented with a Resolute Onyx 3.0 mm × 26 mm stent. The whole length of the LMS into the proximal LAD was stented with a 3.5 mm × 34 mm Resolute Onyx covering the LMS ostium (Figure 2B and C). The LMS segment of the stent was post-dilated with a 4.5 mm NC balloon. Immediately after and despite taking care in removing the trapped LCx wire, there was longitudinal deformation of the stent, which no longer covered the LMS ostium (Figure 2D). After ballooning the deformed stent with a 4.5 mm non-compliant balloon the ostium was covered with another 4.0 mm × 8 mm stent and post-dilated with 4.5 mm NC balloon with an excellent final result (Figure 2E).

Figure 2
Figure 2 Longitudinal deformation of an ostial left main stem stent. A: Initial angiogram showing significant calcific ostial and distal left main lesions with further significant proximal LAD calcific disease; B: After 1.5 burr rotablation, LMS into proximal LAD was stented with a 3.5 mm × 34 mm Resolute Onyx (B) to 14atm covering the LMS ostium (C). The LMS segment of the stent was post-dilated with a 4.5 NC balloon and the jailed LCx wire removed; D: Longitudinal deformation of the ostial LMS stent (yellow arrow pointing at the proximal deformed edge of the stent); E: Final angiographic result after covering the ostial LMS with a 4.0 mm × 8 mm Resolute Onyx stent. LAD: Left anterior descending; LMS: Left main stem.
DISCUSSION

To our knowledge this case series demonstrates the first reported cases of longitudinal deformation in patients treated with the new Resolute Onyx stent platform.

Traditionally, longitudinal strength was not considered standard characteristics for stent performance. However, recent evidence has highlighted possible complications since longitudinal deformation was first reported by Hanratty et al[8], describing 3 cases where longitudinal compression of a previously deployed stent resulted in stent deformation. Two were identified angiographically and one with the aid of intravascular imagining. It was first documented with the Promus Element (Boston Scientific) stent which was related to guide catheter compression of stents deployed in an ostial location[8]. However, Hanratty et al[8] have observed this phenomenon in other drug eluting stents. A retrospective analysis of 4455 interventional cases over a four-year period showed stent deformation occurred in 0.2% of patients affecting 0.097% of stents deployed[7]. In 6 cases, Promus Element was involved, and there was 1 case each involving Endeavor (Medtronic), Biomatrix (Biosensors Interventional Technologies), and TAXUS Liberté (Boston Scientific) stents. The rate of stent deformation varied from 0% in several other stent types to 0.86% in the case of the Promus Element stent. In the same series, there was one case of late stent thrombosis attributable to longitudinal stent deformation[7]. In the DUTCH-PEERS study 906 patients were assigned to receive third generation zotarolimus-eluting stents (Resolute Integrity, Medtronic) and 905 to receive everolimus-eluting stents (Promus Element, Boston Scientific)[9]. Longitudinal stent deformation was seen only in the everolimus-eluting stent group [nine (1.0%) of 905 vs 0 of 906, P = 0.002; nine of 1591 (0.6%) everolimus-eluting stents implanted became deformed], but was not associated with any adverse events.

Despite drug eluting stents having improved remarkably the safety and efficacy of revascularization procedures, stent design is a continuously developing field that aims to balance numerous performance attributes such as stent flexibility, shortening on expansion, trackability, scaffolding, radiopacity, longitudinal strength, radial strength and recoil. An experimental evaluation of longitudinal strength of four commercially available stent design families demonstrated that a 50 g force resulted in longitudinal compression of 1.25-5.30 mm (4.46%-18.93%, compared with the nominal expanded stent length). The Promus Element stent platform had an average longitudinal compression of 13.20 mm (47.07%), demonstrating marked lower resistance to longitudinal compression (Table 1)[10]. Newer stent platforms with ultrathin struts (down to 60 μm) have shown non-inferiority to established everolimus platforms[11] but their longitudinal strength has yet to be assessed on the bench.

Table 1 Design characteristics of commonly used stents.
StentsXience VXience PRIME/ Xience XpeditionPromus ElementPromus PremierSYNERGYResolute Onyx
Stent platformVision: CoCrMultilink-9: CoCrPtCrPtCrPtCrPtIr core Co alloy outer
Strut thickness81 μm81 μm81 μm81 μm74 μm81 μm (up to 4.0 mm) 91 μm (4.5 and 5.0 mm)
Connectors3 links3 links2 links2 links (4 between the 3 proximal hoops)2 linksEvery 4th crown laser fused (in the 2.75, 3.0 mm platforms every 5th crown fused)
Drug elutingEverolimusEverolimusEverolimusEverolimusEverolimusZotarolimus
PolymerPrimer layer PBMA Drug matrix layer A semicrystalline random copolymer: PvDF-HFPPrimer layer PBMA Drug matrix layer A semicrystalline random copolymer: PvDF-HFPPrimer layer PBMA Drug matrix layer A semicrystalline random copolymer: PvDF-HFPPrimer layer PBMA Drug matrix layer A semicrystalline random copolymer: PvDF-HFPBioabsorbable PLGABiocompatible BioLinx polymer
ManufacturerAbbott vascular, Santa Clara, CA, United StatesAbbott vascular, Santa Clara, CA, United StatesBoston Scientific, Natick, MA, United StatesBoston Scientific, Natick, MA, United StatesBoston Scientific, Natick, MA, United StatesMedtronic CardioVascular Ltd, MN, United States

In our series both cases of longitudinal deformation occurred in the hands of very experienced operators implanting the scaffold at an ostial location. Potential reasons behind the deformation could include guide catheter compression of the proximal edge of the ostial stent post removal of jailed wires (case 1 or 2) or aggressive post-dilatation of the stent with a significantly larger NC balloon causing longitudinal shortening (case 2). It is unclear whether laser fusion provides less support compared to traditional links and further evidence is required prior to drawing any conclusions.

In conclusion, longitudinal stent deformation can occur even with new generation ZES and identification is important as, if left untreated, it may associate with a risk of future stent thrombosis, restenosis, and challenges in rewiring and retreating these lesions in the future.

COMMENTS
Case characteristics

The authors presented two cases, one with stable angina and one presenting with a non ST elevation myocardial infarction, requiring treatment of ostial lesions with new generation drug eluting stents.

Treatment

Both cases were treated with the third generation zotarolimus eluting stent Resolut Onyx, and in both cases longitudinal deformation of the stents was observed. This was managed with further ballooning and stenting.

Experiences and lessons

Longitudinal stent deformation can occur even with new generation ZES and identification is important.

Peer-review

This manuscript reports two cases of longitudinal deformation of a 22-mm and 34-mm third generation zotarolimus eluting stent. The issue brought up by the authors is interesting and the cases well documented.

Footnotes

Manuscript source: Invited manuscript

Specialty type: Cardiac and cardiovascular systems

Country of origin: United Kingdom

Peer-review report classification

Grade A (Excellent): A

Grade B (Very good): B

Grade C (Good): C

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P- Reviewer: De Ponti R, Lee TM, Tang JM S- Editor: Song XX L- Editor: A E- Editor: Wu HL

References
1.  Moreno R, Jimenez-Valero S, Sanchez-Recalde A, Galeote G, Calvo L, Martin-Reyes R, Sabate M, Plaza I, Macaya C, Lopez-Sendon JL. Periprocedural (30-day) risk of myocardial infarction after drug-eluting coronary stent implantation: a meta-analysis comparing cobalt-chromium and stainless steel drug-eluting coronary stents. EuroIntervention. 2011;6:1003-1010.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Sen H, Lam MK, Löwik MM, Danse PW, Jessurun GA, van Houwelingen KG, Anthonio RL, Tjon Joe Gin RM, Hautvast RW, Louwerenburg JH. Clinical Events and Patient-Reported Chest Pain in All-Comers Treated With Resolute Integrity and Promus Element Stents: 2-Year Follow-Up of the DUTCH PEERS (DUrable Polymer-Based STent CHallenge of Promus ElemEnt Versus ReSolute Integrity) Randomized Trial (TWENTE II). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:889-899.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 41]  [Article Influence: 4.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Maeng M, Tilsted HH, Jensen LO, Krusell LR, Kaltoft A, Kelbæk H, Villadsen AB, Ravkilde J, Hansen KN, Christiansen EH. Differential clinical outcomes after 1 year versus 5 years in a randomised comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting coronary stents (the SORT OUT III study): a multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial. Lancet. 2014;383:2047-2056.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 83]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 86]  [Article Influence: 8.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Kwok OH. Stent “concertina: “ stent design does matter. J Invasive Cardiol. 2013;25:E114-E119.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Ormiston JA, Webber B, Ubod B, White J, Webster MW. Stent longitudinal strength assessed using point compression: insights from a second-generation, clinically related bench test. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:62-69.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 51]  [Article Influence: 4.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Ormiston JA, Webber B, Webster MW. Stent longitudinal integrity bench insights into a clinical problem. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:1310-1317.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 135]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 139]  [Article Influence: 10.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Williams PD, Mamas MA, Morgan KP, El-Omar M, Clarke B, Bainbridge A, Fath-Ordoubadi F, Fraser DG. Longitudinal stent deformation: a retrospective analysis of frequency and mechanisms. EuroIntervention. 2012;8:267-274.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 92]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 103]  [Article Influence: 8.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Hanratty CG, Walsh SJ. Longitudinal compression: a “new” complication with modern coronary stent platforms--time to think beyond deliverability? EuroIntervention. 2011;7:872-877.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 83]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 90]  [Article Influence: 7.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  von Birgelen C, Sen H, Lam MK, Danse PW, Jessurun GA, Hautvast RW, van Houwelingen GK, Schramm AR, Gin RM, Louwerenburg JW. Third-generation zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting stents in all-comer patients requiring a percutaneous coronary intervention (DUTCH PEERS): a randomised, single-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2014;383:413-423.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 147]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 152]  [Article Influence: 15.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Prabhu S, Schikorr T, Mahmoud T, Jacobs J, Potgieter A, Simonton C. Engineering assessment of the longitudinal compression behaviour of contemporary coronary stents. EuroIntervention. 2012;8:275-281.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 4.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Pilgrim T, Heg D, Roffi M, Tüller D, Muller O, Vuilliomenet A, Cook S, Weilenmann D, Kaiser C, Jamshidi P. Ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent for percutaneous coronary revascularisation (BIOSCIENCE): a randomised, single-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2014;384:2111-2122.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 198]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 218]  [Article Influence: 21.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]